Biofilm formation in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) is influenced by the source water, the supply infrastructure and the operation of the system. A holistic approach was used to advance knowledge on the development of mixed species biofilms in situ, by using biofilm sampling devices installed in chlorinated networks. Key physico-chemical parameters and conventional microbial indicators for drinking water quality were analysed. Biofilm coverage on pipes was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The microbial community structure, bacteria and fungi, of water and biofilms was assessed using pyrosequencing. Conventional wisdom leads to an expectation for less microbial diversity in groundwater supplied systems. However, the analysis of bulk water showed higher microbial diversity in groundwater site samples compared with the surface water site. Conversely, higher diversity and richness were detected in biofilms from the surface water site. The average biofilm coverage was similar among sites. Disinfection residual and other key variables were similar between the two sites, other than nitrates, alkalinity and the hydraulic conditions which were extremely low at the groundwater site. Thus, the unexpected result of an exceptionally low diversity with few dominant genera (Pseudomonas and Basidiobolus) in groundwater biofilm samples, despite the more diverse community in the bulk water, is attributed to the low-flow hydraulic conditions. This finding evidences that the local environmental conditions are shaping biofilm formation, composition and amount, and hence managing these is critical for the best operation of DWDS to safeguard water quality.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00253-015-7155-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Biofilms are ubiquitous throughout drinking water distribution systems (DWDS), playing central roles in system performance and delivery of safe clean drinking water. However, little is known about how the interaction of abiotic and biotic factors influence the microbial communities of these biofilms in real systems. Results are presented here from a one-year study using in situ sampling devices installed in two operational systems supplied with different source waters. Independently of the characteristics of the incoming water and marked differences in hydraulic conditions between sites and over time, a core bacterial community was observed in all samples suggesting that internal factors (autogenic) are central in shaping biofilm formation and composition. From this it is apparent that future research and management strategies need to consider the specific microorganisms found to be able to colonise pipe surfaces and form biofilms, such that it might be possible to exclude these and hence protect the supply of safe clean drinking water.
When 13.4 kg/ha of DDT were applied to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) during the 1969 growing season, 2.83% was found in natural runoff between July 11, 1969 and January 5,1970. About 96% of the DDT in runoff was associated with suspended sediment. Of 26.8 kg/ha of toxaphene applied, 0.36% was detected in runoff, and 75% of the toxaphene in runoff was in the sediment fraction. When DDT and toxaphene were applied to the same plot (13.4 and 26.8 kg/ha, respectively, over the season) only 1.03% of the DDT was found in runoff, and the percentage for toxaphene was 0.61. A much greater percentage of DDT and toxaphene remained as soil residues than was found in runoff, but a high percentage of the pesticides applied was not recovered. Residues of DDT in water from a small pond within one experimental watershed ranged from <0.35 ppb before spraying to 13.4 ppb during the spraying season. Toxaphene residues in pond water varied from <1 ppb before spraying to 65 ppb about midseason.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.