A survey of the mineral composition of 6 swede and 3 kale crops from 9 farms near Gore, Southland, New Zealand, showed that while they provided adequate concentrations of the macroelements and Fe to meet dietary requirements of livestock, the kales were deficient in Mn and Zn (stems only), Cu, Co, and I, whereas the swedes were deficient in Mn, Zn, Se, and I (bulbs only), Cu, and Co. The applications of Co-, Se-, and Cuamended fertilisers at sowing and as a topdressing had no significant effect on the Co and Cu concentrations of swedes and kale. The Se concentrations in the leaves of the kale were roughly doubled 2 to 4 months after the topdressing with Se-amended fertiliser.
Sulphur trials were carried out in the hill and high country of the South Island from 1986/87 to 2000/01. Initial trials showed that sulphur fortified superphosphate fertilisers are more effective products than fine elemental sulphur and sulphur bentonite prills, both in terms of dry matter production and cost effectiveness. This is because Sulphur Super products contain sulphate sulphur and finer elemental sulphur. Sulphur Super Extra (28% S) was more effective in the short to medium term than Maxi Sulphur Super (50% S) largely because it contained more sulphate sulphur. It would be a more preferable option for development, particularly when used at above maintenance rates. It is preferable to apply these products on a biennial rather than a triennial basis to maximise dry matter, maintain better sward composition and to improve the chances of coinciding application with better growth conditions, most notably summer rainfall. Residual elemental sulphur oxidises with time, reducing the dependence on biennial application, although there is still a risk of temporary sulphur deficiency and a delay in response of clover to follow up topdressing if topdressing is left beyond 2 years. Herbage sulphur levels, in conjunction with observation of pasture composition and vigour are useful to indicate when sulphur fertiliser needs to be reapplied. Keywords: sulphate sulphur, elemental sulphur, sulphur bentonite prills, wet mix Sulphur Super, Maxi Sulphur Super, anaerobic nitrogen
The effect of fine slurried lime applied at 200 kg/ha on soil pH at two depths was compared with 400 and 2500 kg/ha of local agricultural (ag) lime in the presence and absence of sulphur (S) superphosphate 20, in Marlborough hill country for one year. In the absence of fertiliser all lime treatments significantly raised soil pH in the top 25 mm for the 355 days after application. Initial responses declined from day 14 or 35 to day 138 before increasing at day 355. Fine lime did not significantly alter pH in the 25-75 mm zone until day 355. The low rate of ag lime significantly raised pH in the 25-75 mm zone for the whole year. The high rate of ag lime significantly increased pH in the top 25 mm over the other lime treatments for the 355 days and over the fine lime treatment in the 25-75 mm zone from day 35. In the presence of fertiliser in the top 25 mm, fine lime significantly increased pH at day 14 only, and low ag lime at day 355 only. The high rate of ag lime significantly increased pH over the control from day 14 and over the other lime rates from day 35. In the 25-75 mm zone the high rate of ag lime significantly increased pH over the control and the low ag lime rate from day 71 but was significantly better than fine lime from day 35. It is likely that rain immediately after application and higher than average annual rainfall hastened the release of fine and intermediate particles of lime. However provided lime meets the accepted criteria for particle size distribution and maximum size it is the rate of application which dictates the magnitude of response. In Marlborough hill country it was 43% cheaper to aerially apply 400 kg/ha of ag lime compared to 200 kg/ha of fine lime with the added benefit of a greater residual effect beyond one year. Keywords: agricultural lime, fine lime, slurry, soil pH
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.