Background Lifestyle modifications, in older at risk populations, may prevent or slow the rate of cognitive decline. Promotion of brain health has been recommended by the WHO and other governing bodies. Supporting patients in making these lifestyle changes, however, can be complex. Generic guidance may not apply to all in a heterogenous and frail patient cohort, when physical mobility may be limited and weight loss/nutrition a concern. We sought to review current practices and barriers to brain health guidance in a regional integrated care outreach programme (ICOP). Methods From March–June’21 the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of consecutive patients were reviewed. Those presenting with cognitive complaints, for their first assessment, were included. Demographic data and data on screening for hearing impairment and sleep disturbance were collected, in addition to information on physical activity and nutritional risk. Whether information and guidance on aspects of brain health was given was also assessed. Results 30 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 80.3 and the mean clinical frailty scale (CFS) was 4.4. Hearing impairment was present in 20% (n = 6), with no information available in 10% (n = 3). All patients were screened for sleep disturbance, with 13% (n = 4) not fully satisfied with their sleep. Mobility aids, assistance or supervision were required in 40% (n = 12), and 23% (n = 7) were at medium or high malnutrition risk. Only 30% (n = 9) cooked their own meals. Generic brain health advice, or advice about sleep was documented in 30 (n = 9), without hearing impairment advice documented in any patient. Conclusion There are several barriers to brain health advice in the ICOP setting, with only 30% of patients having brain health advice documented. We are currently developing patient information leaflets on brain health, that will take potential barriers into account. Dedicated and specific information on local hearing services is also in development, as part of an ongoing quality improvement project.
Background In September 2019 Sláintecare helped establish an Integrated Care team for Older People. The aim of this service was to provide a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to older people within a community network. Service user experience/feedback are critically important for development of a team and a service. To give service users a platform to evaluate the service a patient experience survey was conducted. Methods The survey was designed by the multidisciplinary team, consisting of 13 closed/3 open questions. A Likert scale was utilised for closed questions and thematic analysis for open questions. A question on impact of COVID-19 was also included. 150 of the 950 service users who received a CGA from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected randomly and invited to participate in the postal survey. All participants received a covering letter, questionnaire and a stamped address envelope to return their completed surveys. Results 47% response rate (71/150). 77% were aged ≥75. 52% completed the survey themselves, 48% required assistance. 61% attended more than twice and most would prefer to attend a local spoke clinic. 96% agreed/strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the service. 99% felt they were treated with dignity/respect and had confidence in the service. 93% agreed that they were involved in care decisions. 82% reported their carers had the opportunity to discuss concerns. Themes emerging included importance of care close to home, avoiding acute hospital, difficulty parking at tertiary centres. 42% highlighted isolation and loneliness due to COVID-19 as a major issue. Conclusion Service users had an overwhelmingly positive experience especially when care was delivered in clinics close to their homes. Development of the hub and spoke model is acceptable and feasible to older people and their carers’ in this region and will be the focus for expansion of this service.
Background Home support services aim to support older people to remain at home. Despite substantial investment in home support hours (€600 million), this has not translated into increased carers on the ground for older people. We aimed to report patterns of home support service utilisation in older patients with memory problems, and identify any mis-matches between allocated and received hours, and the impact on patients and caregivers. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred to community geriatric clinic from January 2021 to May 2022. 95/104 patients who were identified were suitable for inclusion. Results Participants had a median age of 82 (IQR 78-86) of whom 57% were female (n=54). 80% (n=76) were frail (CFS ≥4), with 82% dependent for IADLs (Lawton-Brody IADL Scale ≤6). Median MOCA score was 18, with 44% having moderate to severe cognitive impairment (MOCA ≤17). 40% of patients lived with alone (n=38). 52% (n=49) received formal home supports while 80% (n=76) had an informal carer. 37% (n=18) had a mismatch between hours allocated and hours received. There was a significant difference between median hours of care allocated (7) and median hours of care received (5), p <0.001. Increasing age and frailty, worsening cognitive and functional impairment and living status (living alone) predicted allocation of home supports. Patients who lived with family members were 3 times more likely not to receive allocated hours (OR 3.84 (95% CI 1.2–13.7)) Conclusion In this vulnerable population with cognitive and functional decline, just over half received formal home support hours. A large proportion experienced significant mismatch between allocated and received hours. Family and informal caregivers often have to fill gaps, adding to existing carer strain. Future models of home support should prioritise early intervention for people with IADL loss to remain independent at home and broaden of the scope of practice of carers to facilitate this.
Background Sláintecare advocates for right care, in the right place at the right time. ANPs for Older Persons in the community are uniquely placed to deliver care as close as possible to the older person’s home and to lead a holistic, flexible model of care minimising admission to acute care and maximising existing local resources. A pilot programme aimed at providing ANP led comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) (with Geriatrician support) to older people in a defined area commenced in June 2019. This pilot was part of a larger Hub and Spoke model funded by Sláintecare which gave additional MDT support. Methods A referral template was designed. Criteria for referral included; age > 75 years, Rockwood Frailty Scale 4–6 (focusing on Falls, Cognitive Impairment and Complex Frailty). Older people on the cusp of requiring long term care (LTC) were also prioritised. A prospective database of patients was maintained by the ANP to evaluate the service. Results From June 2019 to August 2021, 156 patients received an ANP led CGA, mostly conducted in the home. 247 reviews were conducted at the local spoke clinic and 46 joint ANP/Geriatrician home visits. Majority of referrals were from GP (n = 69), hospital (n = 30), LTC reviews (n = 22) and Community Nursing Units (CNUs) (n = 19). 449 outpatient appointments have been removed from the tertiary referral centre. Independent case load management from the ANP includes further appointments, telephone follow up/advice and she is a point of contact where crises arise before referral to acute services. 99% of patients surveyed reported satisfaction with the service especially the ease of local access and home visits. Conclusion Older Persons’ ANP can provide longitudinal care pathways for older adults in the community in conjunction with ICPOP and local CNUs, intervening before crises emerge and providing continuity of care and an alternative to acute care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.