Because dominants usually exploit others and take a disproportionate share of the available resources, we should expect foragers to be choosy as to which individuals they join. Here we show that siskins (Carduelis spinus) discriminate between dominant and subordinate individuals on the ¢rst encounter without requiring cues such as overt aggression, and prefer to join subordinate individuals. Experimental enlargement or removal of the siskin black bib, which has been shown previously to be a reliable predictor of dominance, strongly suggests that dominance discrimination is based on the use of badges of status.
Rohwer (1975, 1982) proposed that the variation and extent of color patches in the plumage of wintering birds could work as badges of social status. The major advantage of these signals would be that individuals of unequal status competing for limited resources would not need to risk accidental injury or waste energy assessing the relative fighting ability of potential opponents (Rohwer 1982). The status-signalling hypothesis has been tested in several species with variable plumage (reviewed by Whitfield 1987; see also Amat 1986, Watt 1986a, b, Fugle and Rothstein 1987, Motter 1987a, b, 1989, Jackson et al. 1988). These studies have, however, produced contradictory results. For plumage differences to act as true badges of dominance, they should correlate within and not just between sex and age classes. This has been demonstrated in only a few species (Great Tit [Parus major], J•irvi and Bakken 1984; Yellow Warbler [Dendroica petechia], Studd and Robertson 1985; House Sparrow
Behavioural integration associated with the fusion of two flocks is analyzed in captive siskins (Carduelis spinus) by quantifying changes in social behaviour with time since joining. In general there was an increase in the incidence of tolerant behaviour, supplanting attacks and hopping withdrawals with time since fusion of the flocks. However, the number of displays and flights showed the opposite, negative, trend. Taking dominance status into account, the greatest change in behaviour with time since joining is an increase in tolerance by dominants of new flock companions. Factorial analysis of correspondences was used to study how different birds changed their behaviour with time since joining a flock. This analysis showed that the introduction of new birds did not disrupt relationships with familiar birds, and that residents are dominant in interactions with the incoming new flock companions. The analysis also demonstrated that relationships within the new flock had stabilized 20 days after the flocks had joined. The characteristics of the socially integrated group of siskins are quite similar to those described by Rohwer & Ewald (1981) in their shepherds hypothesis: dominants tolerate their subordinates feeding in close proximity, offering them a profitable feeding area, but also supplant them to obtain food; both dominants and subordinates benefit from being in a flock. As a consequence, constant changes of membership in flocks is costly not only because birds lose dominance status, but also the advantages of clear dominant and subordinate roles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.