1997. Chicken breasts with skin were packaged either in air, under vacuum or in modified atmospheres of (i) 30% CO 2 /70% N 2 and (ii) 70% CO 2 /30% N 2 . After 3, 7, 14 and 21 days of storage at 4°C, the samples were evaluated for spoilage microbial growth, odour and overall aspect. As expected, pseudomonads grew well in air or under vacuum, but growth was suppressed in both types of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). However, growth of lactobacilli, Enterobacteriaceae and Brochothrix thermosphacta was not inhibited in MAPs. Modified atmosphere packaging (ii) extended shelf-life up to 21 days compared to 5 days for air-packed samples.

Aims: A comparison of Enterobacteriaceae, coliform and Escherichia coli counts in chicken carcasses with and without visible faecal contamination was conducted to evaluate the role of contamination as a vehicle for generic E. coli, coliform and other enterobacteria contaminating broiler chicken carcasses when processed under routine commercial operations. Methods and Results: Samples were removed from the processing line immediately after evisceration, insideoutside shower and chilling for microbiological analysis. After evisceration, mean counts were significantly different only for E. coli (P £ 0AE05) in chicken carcasses with and without visible faecal contamination. While the spray wash practice was not efficient enough for complete removal of the visible contamination from carcasses, leading to microbiological reduction percentages lower than expected, 25 ppm chlorinated water chilling did reduce the contamination level considerably in all samples. Conclusions: Carcasses with and without visible faecal contamination harboured E. coli and other potentially hazardous enterobacteria. E. coli was the predominant strain isolated in all samples, Enterobacter cloacae being next most frequent. Significance and Impact of the Study: The zero tolerance of visible faecal contamination requirement alone is not sufficient to assure safety and to improve the microbial quality of carcasses.

Samples of chicken breasts with skin were treated with a 1% acetic acid solution or untreated and packaged in a 70% CO 2 /30% N 2 modified atmosphere. Two different types of films were studied to establish their usefulness within the above pre-determined conditions. After 3, 7, 14 and 21 d of storage at 4°C, the samples were evaluated for spoilage microbial growth, odour and slime, as well as the gas composition in the headspace volume in the package. As a result of this, it was found that both films were adequate for using them as barriers. Samples treated with the acetic acid solution smelt slightly acidic and pleasant, while the untreated ones had 'off' odours at the end of the storage periods. However, all samples showed acceptable overall aspect by that time. Acetic acid treatment produced decreases in counts in all genera studied. Results of this study indicate that using modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on chicken breasts previously decontaminated with acetic acid is a worthwhile technology to extend samples shelflife.

Objective:  To determine the effect of refrigeration time and temperature on Salmonella cell numbers on inoculated chicken carcasses and their transfer to a plastic cutting board. Methods and Results:  The survival of Salmonella on chicken skin and the transfer to a plastic cutting board when exposed to different refrigeration temperatures (2, 6 or 8°C) for 9 days were the two main issues on which this work focused. Two scenarios were carried out to ascertain these effects: carcasses treated with a decontaminating acetic acid solution and untreated carcasses. All of the contaminated carcasses remained contaminated after 9 days of refrigeration. However, on untreated samples, while Salmonella numbers increased almost 1·5 log at 8°C, the pathogen numbers decreased about 1 log at 2 and 6°C. On acid‐treated samples, cell numbers slightly decreased at all of the temperatures studied. Temperature did not affect salmonellae transfer to the cutting board, but time did. Acid decontamination increased cell numbers transferred to the cutting board compared with untreated samples. Conclusion:  Proper refrigeration at low temperatures did not allow Salmonella numbers to rise, regardless of which carcasses had been, or had not been, acid treated. Despite the fact that the rate of transfer was not affected by temperature, the acid treatment detached Salmonella cells from the chicken skin and, therefore, the probability of greater cross‐contamination should be studied further. Significance and Impact of the Study:  The results of this study may provide better information about the refrigeration conditions for fresh chicken storage and also determine if these, along with acetic acid decontamination of broiler chicken, would affect the pathogen transfer to a cutting board.