Background In remote islands lack of specialized medical facilities, long distance transfer and emergency medical system organization remains a challenge and fibrinolysis is necessary to achieve revascularization in optimal timing in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Our angioplasty center is the only one located in an archipelago composed of nine islands, six of which do not have hospital facilities and only have small family health care units. Purpose To evaluate the reality and outcomes of our interventional angioplasty center and compare cardiovascular outcomes between STEMI patients from the main island and remote islands. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 103 patients with STEMI admitted to our center between 2018 and 2019. Patients from the main island where the center is located underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (group 1, n=55) and patients from remote islands underwent fibrinolytic therapy followed by transference to our center with facilitated or rescue PCI (group 2, n=48). A subanalysis of the far remote islands without hospital facilities was also performed. Primary outcome was defined as cardiovascular death or re-infarction at two years and secondary outcome as intrahospital haemorrhagic complications. Results Mean age was 58,15±12,6 years, 85,4% were males and follow up period was 30,30±6,46 months. Seventy-eight patients (75,7%) had history of smoking, 45 (43,7%) dyslipidemia, 20 (19,4%) previous acute coronary syndrome, 18 (17,5%) diabetes and 17 (15,5%) were obese. Troponin I peak was 117,42±129,06 ug/L and 14 (13,6%) were in Killip Class III/IV. Infarct-related artery was the left anterior descending artery in 45 (45,5%) and multivessel disease was present in 38 (38,0%). In group 1 reperfusion after PCI was obtained in 91,5%. In group 2, 73,5% met criteria for reperfusion after fibrinolysis and 23,6% after rescue PCI. Mean time from fibrinolysis to PCI was 558±349 minutes. Rates of successful revascularization did not differ between groups, as well as complete patency of the culprit-vessel defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow 3 (91,5% vs. 97,2% and 90,0% vs. 93,0% respectively for group 1 and 2). Cardiovascular death at two years occurred in 4 (3,9%) patients and re-infarction in 11 (10,7%) and were similar between groups (3 (5,5%) vs. 1 (2,1%) and 8 (14,5%) vs. 3 (6,3%) respectively) as well as haemorrhagic complications (1 (1,8%) vs. 5 (10,4%) respectively). Nineteen (18,4%) patients were from far remote islands without hospital facilities and when comparing these patients with the others there was also no difference in primary outcome. Conclusion Even in remote islands, an organized STEMI network with attempted fibrinolytic treatment and coordinated transference of patients for facilitated or rescue PCI can provide successful revascularization with cardiovascular outcomes similar to those submitted to primary PCI. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Background Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is commonly found in patients with structural heart disease and was historically obtained from registers of external ambulatory monitoring. The advent of Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has made it possible to detect asymptomatic NSVT in Heart Failure (HF) patients more frequently, but its true impact in real world is uncertain, and often does not lead to a change in clinical intervention. Purpose To determine the prognostic significance of NSVT detection on stored electrograms of CIEDs in HF patients with systolic left ventricle dysfunction. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 132 consecutive HF patients (mean age 67,5±11,1 years, males 72,0%) with systolic left ventricle dysfunction and CIEDs (biventricular pacemakers with or without cardiac defibrillators). Patients were evaluated through CIEDs interrogation and clinical evaluations and divided into NSVT positive (Group 1) and negative groups (Group 2). Mean follow-up period was 62,8±7,1 months. Results NSVT was detected in 51 (38,6%) patients. 70 (53,0%) had implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator (CRT-D), 37 (28,0%) transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), 13 (9,8%) CRT pacemaker (CRT-P) and 12 (9,1%) subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD). Medium left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 31,1±7,9%, 20,6% were in NYHA III-IV and 47,0% were ischemic (49% Group 1 and 45,7% Group 2, p=0,708). Dyslipidemia was more prevalent in Group 2 (p=0,042). In total 11 (8,3%) patients died, 2 (1,5%) from sudden cardiac death and 5 (3,8%) from cardiovascular death. NSVT was associated with CIEDs treatments (hazard ratio [HR]2,52; 95% confidence interval [CI]1,2–5,1; p=0,001), ventricular fibrillation (VF) (HR: 3,71, 95% CI: 1,19–11,58; p=0,018), sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (HR: 9,06, 95% CI: 2,82–29,12; p<0,05) and composite outcome of VT, VF, HF re-admissions and related admissions to emergency department (ED) and death by all causes (HR: 2,52; 95% CI: 1,20–5,10; p=0,011). NSVT at 1 year was associated with HF readmissions at 1 year (p=0,004). Conclusions On extended monitoring possible with CIEDs, NSVT in HF patients was associated with a worse prognosis and may serve as a predictor of significant arrhythmic events, HF hospitalizations and mortality. These findings enhances the importance of remote monitoring and optimization of therapeutic modalities in these patients along with a close supervision. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Background Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is commonly found in patients with structural heart disease and was historically obtained from registers of external ambulatory monitoring. The advent of remote patient monitoring (RPM) in Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has made it possible to detect asymptomatic NSVT in Heart Failure (HF) patients more frequently, but its impact in real world is uncertain. Purpose To determine the clinical impact of NSVT detection in RPM in ischemic and non-ischemic chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and CIEDs. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 121 consecutive patients with HFrEF, CIEDs and RPM. Patients were evaluated through routine episodic CIEDs interrogation, routine clinical evaluations and continuous monitoring data obtained from CIEDs and transmitted remotely to the care team and divided into NSVT positive (Group 1) and negative groups (Group 2). Primary endpoint was admissions to the emergency department by HF decompensation and secondary endpoint was the occurrence of arrhythmic events. A sub-analysis of non-ischemic HF was also performed. Results NSVT was detected in 78 (72,2%) patients. The mean number of episodes of NSVT was 611,68±3271,25 during the follow-up period or 2,445±16,688 in 24 hours. Mean age was 62,40±13,218 years, 71,9% were males and mean follow-up period was 56,30±39,37 months. Fifty-eight patients (47,9%) had transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), 48 (39,7%) implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator (CRT-D), 14 (11,6%) subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and 1 (0,8%) CRT pacemaker (CRT-P). Medium left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 34,70±12,53%, 25 (23,14%) were in NYHA III-IV and 46 (39,0%) were ischemic (29 (37,7%) in Group 1 and 11 (37,9%) in Group 2). NSVT was associated with the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (1,88±0,186episodes of VT in group 1 and 0,03±0,186 in group 2, p=0,012), ventricular fibrillation (VF) (1,44±5,325 episodes of VT in group 1 and 0,03±0,186 in group 2, p=0,011) and admissions to the emergency department by HF decompensation at 5 years (r=0,310, p=0,011). A sub-analysis in non-ischemic HF patients also showed correlation between NSVT and VT (r=0,602, p<0,05) and admissions to the emergency department by HF decompensation at 5 years (r=0,382, p=0,014). Conclusions On remote patient monitoring with CIEDs, NSVT in HF patients was associated with arrhythmic events and may serve as a predictor for HF decompensations. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.