The thermochemical recycling of natural rubber (NR) and ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM) vulcanizates with disulfides was studied. NR sulfur vulcanizates were completely plasticized when heated with diphenyldisulfide at 200 °C. It could be concluded that both main chain scission and crosslink scission caused the network breakdown. NR peroxide vulcanizates were less reactive towards disulfide at 200 °C, and only reacted through main chain scission. For EPDM a temperature range of 200–275 °C was studied. In the presence of diphenyldisulfide at 200 °C there was almost no devulcanization of EPDM sulfur vulcanizates, and at 225 and 250 °C there was only slightly more devulcanization. A decrease in crosslink density of 90% was found when 2×10−4 mol diphenyldisulfide/cm3 vulcanizate was added and the EPDM sulfur vulcanizates were heated to 275 °C. EPDM peroxide vulcanizates showed a decrease in crosslink density of ca. 40% under the same conditions. The lower reactivity of EPDM towards disulfide compared with NR is the result of higher crosslink densities, the presence of a higher percentage of more stable monosulfidic crosslinks and the fact that EPDM is less apt to main chain scission relative to NR.
Novozym 435-catalyzed ring-opening of a range of omega-methylated lactones demonstrates fascinating differences in rate of reaction and enantioselectivity. A switch from S- to R-selectivity was observed upon going from small (ring sizes
Accelerated-sulfur-vulcanized 13 C-labeled EPDM with and without carbon black and extender oil was analyzed using 13 C solid-state NMR to determine the chemical structure of the network. Highresolution solid-state 13 C NMR reveals that sulfur cross-linking takes place at the allylic positions of the ENB independent of the presence of carbon black and oil. From the integrated intensities of the 13 C signals, the conversion of ENB into a cross-link can be quantitatively determined during the vulcanization process. The ENB conversion for gumstock EPDM is ∼10% after 10 min of vulcanization at 150 °C, which is a typical optimum vulcanization time in commercial applications. In the presence of carbon black the ENB conversion is marginally faster and reaches ∼12% in 10 min, while a maximum conversion of ∼20% was obtained. The efficiency of the ENB conversion was ∼20% less at 150 °C and ∼30% less at 180 °C in the compound with carbon black and oil compared to the compound without carbon black and oil. The substitution at the 9-position of ENB is always preferred over each of the two 3-positions. In turn, the substitution on the 3-exo position is always preferred over the 3-endo position, which is different from earlier model studies. When the material is heated for extended periods (10-20 min), oxidation and reversion of the cross-links starts to occur. Reversion is enhanced upon a temperature increase to 180 °C and yields a 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-4,7-methanobenzo[b]thiophene compound. The length of the sulfur bridge in compound A and B is rather short, i.e., 1 or 2.
Ethylene-propylene-diene rubbers (EPDM) with 2-ethylidene-5-norbornene (ENB), dicyclopentadiene (DCPD), and 1,4-hexadiene (HD) as third monomers have been vulcanized with peroxide and with a conventional sulfur vulcanization recipe, and their devulcanization was subsequently investigated for recycling purposes. The behavior of these vulcanizates during pure thermal devulcanization depends on the EPDM third monomer and the crosslinker used. Peroxide vulcanizates of ENB-EPDM devulcanize only to a small extent and predominantly by random scission, whereas peroxide vulcanizates of HD-EPDM devulcanize by crosslink scission. In contrast, sulfur vulcanizates of ENB-EPDM, devulcanize mainly by crosslink scission. During devulcanization of sulfur-cured HD-EPDM, scission of both crosslinks and main chains occurs. Sulfur-cured DCPD-EPDM cannot be devulcanized but shows further crosslinking instead. In those cases, where purely thermal devulcanization is already effective to a certain extent, diphenyldisulfide as devulcanization agent increases the effectivity during thermochemical devulcanization. Hexadecylamine as an alternative devulcanization agent is effective for ENB-EPDM but does not contribute to thermochemical devulcanization of HD-EPDM. In summary, devulcanization proceeds by different mechanisms in ENB-EPDM, DCPD-EPDM, and HD-EPDM. Explanations are given in terms of the chemical structures of the third monomers, the corresponding crosslinks, and devulcanization agents.
The theoretical model developed by Charlesby to quantify the balance between cross-links creation of polymers and chain scission during radiation cross-linking and further modifications by Horikx to describe network breakdown from aging were merged to characterize the balance of both types of scission on the development of the sol content during de-vulcanization of rubber networks. There are, however, disturbing factors in these theoretical considerations vis-à-vis practical reality. Sulfur- and peroxide-cured NR and EPDM vulcanizates were de-vulcanized under conditions of selective cross-link and random main-chain scissions. Cross-link scission was obtained using thiol-amine reagents for selective cleavage of sulfur cross-links. Random main-chain scission was achieved by heating peroxide vulcanizates of NR with diphenyldisulfide, a method commonly employed for NR reclaiming. An important factor in the analyses of these experiments is the cross-linking index. Its value must be calculated using the sol fraction of the cross-linked network before de-vulcanization to obtain reliable results. The values for the cross-linking index calculated with sol-gel data before de-vulcanization appear to fit the experimentally determined modes of network scission during de-vulcanization very well. This study confirms that the treatment of de-vulcanization data with the merged Charlesby and Horikx models can be used satisfactorily to characterize the de-vulcanization of NR and EPDM vulcanizates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.