A total of 320 stool specimens obtained from 262 patients suspected of having Clostridium diffciIe-associated gastrointestinal disease were examined with two cytotoxicity assays (CTAs) and two commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). The CTAs were an in-house-developed procedure (University of Massachusetts Medical Center [UMMC], Worcester, Mass.) and a commercial test (Bartels CTA; Baxter Healthcare Corp., West Sacramento, Calif.). One EIA was a monoclonal antibody-based assay for C. difficile toxins A and B (Cambridge Biotech Corp. [CBCJ, Worcester, Mass.). The other EIA employed monoclonal antibodies directed against only toxin A (Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, Ohio). True-positive and true-negative results were defined on the basis of the results of the four assays, clinical assessments of patients, and the results of other laboratory tests. The sensitivities of the four assays were as follows: Bartels CTA, 100%o; UMMC CTA, 97.2%; CBC EIA, 84.5%; and Meridian EIA, 69.0%o. The Bartels CTA demonstrated a specificity of 99.2%. The other three assays had a specificity of 100%o.
Nine hundred forty-five stool specimens from patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile disease were examined using a cell culture cytotoxicity assay (CTA), two enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits (Cytoclone for toxins A and B; VIDAS for toxin A) and a latex agglutination assay (CDT). One hundred nineteen specimens had positive titers (> or = 90) in the CTA; clinical review of 16 discordant samples and 49 controls supported the significance of 90 as the positive cut-off titer. The performance of the two EIAs and the latex assay was assessed relative to CTA titers of the samples. Sensitivity was < or = 50% for all three assays for the 24 specimens with CTA titers of 90, but it reached 97-100% for the two EIAs and 84% for the latex assay at titers of > or = 2,250. The Cytoclone EIA exhibited higher sensitivity at the lower positive titers. Overall, specificity of the methods ranged from 96.7% (CDT latex assay) to 99.1% (Cytoclone EIA).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.