Cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists, including delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta 9-THC) (the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana) have been shown to increase feeding in rats and humans. Conversely, it has been reported that acute administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A reduces food intake in rats. Based upon this observation, it has been suggested that CB1 antagonists could be useful as appetite suppressant drugs. The present studies were designed to provide a detailed examination of the effects of CB1 antagonists on food intake across a range of paradigms. Two CB1 antagonists (SR 141716A and AM 251) were administered to rats trained on fixed-ratio schedules with two different ratio requirements (fixed-ratio 1 and fixed-ratio 5). Both drugs produced a dose-dependent decrease in lever pressing, and had a relatively long duration of action (T1/2: SR 141716A, 15.1 h; AM 251, 22.0 h). Furthermore, intake of three diets with differing macronutrient composition (lab chow, high fat, high carbohydrate) was studied. Both drugs significantly suppressed intake of all three foods, and there were no significant interactions between drug dose and diet type. These findings support the hypothesis that CB1 receptor antagonists could be useful pharmacological tools for the suppression of appetite.

No abstract

No abstract

Overt similarities exist between the effects of systemic cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonists and dopamine (DA) antagonists on appetitive behavior. The present set of studies was undertaken to apply a fine-grained analysis of food-reinforced operant lever pressing in rats in order to compare the pattern of effects produced by administration of the CB1 inverse agonist AM 251 and those induced by the DA D1 antagonist SKF 83566, and the D2 antagonist raclopride. Three groups of rats were trained on a fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) schedule and administered these compounds over a range of doses expected to suppress responding. All three drugs produced a dose-related suppression of total lever pressing. In addition to main effects of dose, regression analyses were performed to determine which of several response timing- and rate-related variables correlated most strongly with overall responding in each group. It was found that total session time spent pausing from responding was significantly better at predicting responding in the AM 251 group, while both DA antagonists produced significantly stronger regression coefficients (vs. AM 251) from fast responding measures. These results suggest that, while several similarities exist, CB1, D1, and D2 antagonists are not identical in their pattern of suppression of food-maintained lever pressing.