The present study investigates treatment satisfaction (TS) rated by multiple informants (patient, parent, therapist) following routine outpatient cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) within a large sample (n = 965) of clinically referred adolescents aged 11-20 years. Moreover, potential predictors of TS were analyzed (patient-related variables, mental disorder characteristics, socio-demographic factors and treatment variables). Overall, our results show a high treatment satisfaction in patient, parent and therapist ratings, with the therapists being the most critical raters (completely/predominantly satisfied: 87.8% in patient, 92.0% in parent, and 64.0% in therapist ratings). Correlations between the three raters were only small to moderate, but statistically significant. Regression analysis examining differential effects found that mental disorder characteristics (parent- and patient-reported symptoms at post) and treatment variables (especially cooperation of patients and parents as rated by therapists) explained most of the variance in TS, whereas patient-related or socio-demographic variables did not emerge as relevant predictors of TS. The amounts of explained variance were R = 0.594 in therapist rating, R = 0.322 in patient rating and R = 0.203 in parent rating.

Few studies have examined the effectiveness of outpatient cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered in routine care settings for children and adolescents with mental disorders. This observational study examined changes in behavioral and emotional problems of adolescents with mental disorders during routine outpatient CBT delivered at a university outpatient clinic and compared them with a historical control group of youths who received academic tutoring of comparable length and intensity. Assessments were made at the start and end of treatment (pre- and post-assessment) using parent ratings of the German versions of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and self-ratings of the Youth Self-Report (YSR) scale. For the main analysis, 677 adolescents aged 11‒21 years had complete data. Changes from pre- to post-assessment showed significant reductions in mental health problems on both parent- and self-ratings. Pre- to post-effect sizes (Cohen's d) were small-to-medium for the total sample (d = 0.23 to d = 0.62) and medium-to-large for those adolescents rated in the clinical range on each (sub)scale at the start of treatment (d = 0.65 to d = 1.48). We obtained medium net effect sizes (d = 0.69) for the CBCL and YSR total scores when patients in the clinical range were compared to historical controls. However, a substantial part of the sample remained in the clinical range at treatment end. The results suggest that CBT is effective for adolescents with mental disorders when administered under routine care conditions but must be interpreted conservatively due to the lack of a direct control condition.

This observational study examined treatment satisfaction (TS) following routine outpatient cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in a large sample of children (n = 795; aged 6 to 10 years). TS was investigated in parent and therapist rating. Means, standard deviations and inter-rater correlations were calculated to investigate TS. Regression analysis was conducted to examine potential correlates of TS (patient-related variables, mental disorder characteristics, socio-demographic factors and treatment variables). High TS in parent and therapist rating was found, with therapists showing a lower degree of TS than parents (completely or predominantly satisfied: parent rating 94.1%, therapist rating 69.5%). A statistically significant, moderate inter-rater correlation was found. Regression analysis explained 21.8% of the variance in parent rating and 57.2% in therapist rating. Most of the TS variance was explained by mental disorder characteristics (parent-rated symptoms and therapist-rated global impairment at treatment end) and by treatment variables (especially the therapist-rated cooperation of parents and patients), whereas socio-demographic and patient-related variables did not show any relevant associations with TS. Based on these results, to optimize TS, therapists should concentrate on establishing a sustainable cooperation of parents and children during therapy, and work to achieve a low global impairment at treatment end.

Significant reductions in both OCD and comorbid symptoms were demonstrated over the course of cognitive-behavioral therapy of juvenile OCD disorders in a university outpatient clinic for child and adolescent psychotherapy. These results indicate that routine CBT treatment is an effective way to treat juvenile OCD disorders in clinical practice.

Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: Die Wirksamkeit von kognitiver Verhaltenstherapie bei Kindern und Jugendlichen unter Routinebedingungen ist bislang noch wenig untersucht. Fragestellung: Es wurden Veränderungen psychischer Auffälligkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen im Elternurteil während ambulanter Verhaltenstherapie in einer universitären Ausbildungsambulanz untersucht. Die Therapien wurden durchgeführt von Diplom-Psychologen, Pädagogen, Sozialpädagogen und Sozialarbeitern in fortgeschrittener Ausbildung zum Kinder- und Jugendlichenpsychotherapeuten mit Schwerpunkt Verhaltenstherapie. Alle Therapien wurden im Verhältnis 1:4 supervidiert. Methode: Für 976 Therapien wurden Completeranalysen als Prä-Post-Vergleiche mit Effektstärken auf der Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) berechnet und die klinische Bedeutsamkeit der Veränderungen analysiert–jeweils für die Gesamtgruppe und für die auf der CBCL zu Therapiebeginn klinisch Auffälligen. Zusätzlich wurde die Repräsentativität dieser Analyse für die gesamte Stichprobe überprüft. Ergebnisse: In der Gesamtgruppe fanden sich kleine bis mittlere, in der Gruppe der im Elternurteil auf der CBCL klinisch Auffälligen hauptsächlich große, statistisch signifikante Verminderungen psychischer Auffälligkeiten, die nicht durch Spontanveränderungen oder Regressionseffekte erklärt werden können. Allerdings wurden 1/4 bis 1/3 der Patienten auch nach Therapieende von ihren Eltern weiterhin als klinisch auffällig eingeschätzt. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Ergebnisse weisen auf die Wirksamkeit kognitiv-behavioraler Therapie bei psychisch kranken Kindern und Jugendlichen unter Anwendungsbedingungen hin. Aufgrund der mangelnden experimentellen Kontrolle ist die Aussagekraft der Ergebnisse begrenzt.