Background Obesity has been linked to increased mortality in several cancer types; however, the relationship between obesity and survival in metastatic melanoma is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between BMI, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in metastatic melanoma. Methods This study included 6 independent cohorts for a total of 1918 metastatic melanoma patients. These included two targeted therapy cohorts [randomized control trials (RCTs) of dabrafenib and trametinib (n=599) and vemurafenib and cobimetinib (n=240)], two immunotherapy cohorts [RCT of ipilimumab + dacarbazine (DTIC) (n=207) and a retrospective cohort treated with anti-PD-1/PDL-1 (n=331)], and two chemotherapy cohorts [RCT DTIC cohorts (n=320 and n=221)]. BMI was classified as normal (BMI 18 to <25; n=694 of 1918, 36.1%) overweight (BMI 25-29.9; n=711, 37.1%) or obese (BMI≥30; n=513, 26.7%). The primary outcomes were the association between BMI, PFS, and OS, stratified by treatment type and sex. These exploratory analyses were based on previously reported intention-to-treat data from the RCTs. The effect of BMI on PFS and OS was assessed by multivariable-adjusted Cox models in independent cohorts. In order to provide a more precise estimate of the association between BMI and outcomes, as well as the interaction between BMI, sex, and therapy type, adjusted hazard ratios were combined in mixed-effects meta-analyses and heterogeneity was explored with meta-regression analyses. Findings In the pooled analysis, obesity, as compared to normal BMI, was associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic melanoma [average adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI: 0.77 (0.66-0.90) and 0.74 (0.58-0.95) for PFS and OS, respectively]. The survival benefit associated with obesity was restricted to patients treated with targeted therapy [0.72 (0.57-0.91) and 0.60 (0.45-0.79) for PFS and OS, respectively] and immunotherapy [0.75 (0.56-1.00) and 0.64 (0.47-0.86)]. No associations were observed with chemotherapy [0.87 (0.65-1.17) and 1.03 (0.80-1.34); treatment p for interaction = 0.61 and 0.01, for PFS and OS, respectively]. The prognostic effect of BMI with targeted and immune therapies differed by sex with pronounced inverse associations in males [PFS 0.67 (0.53-0.84) and OS 0.53 (0.40-0.70)], but not females [PFS 0.92 (0.70-1.23) and OS 0.85 (0.61-1.18), sex p for interaction= 0.08 and 0.03, for PFS and OS, respectively] Interpretation Obesity is associated with improved PFS and OS in metastatic melanoma, driven by strong associations observed in males treated with targeted or immune therapy. The magnitude of the benefit detected supports the need for investigation into the underlying mechanism of these unexpected observations Funding ASCO/CCF Young Investigator Award and ASCO/CCF Career Development Award to JLM

Activation of protein kinase CB (PKCB) has been repeatedly implicated in tumor-induced angiogenesis. The PKCB-selective inhibitor, Enzastaurin (LY317615.HCl), suppresses angiogenesis and was advanced for clinical development based upon this antiangiogenic activity. Activation of PKCB has now also been implicated in tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumor invasiveness. Herein, we show that Enzastaurin has a direct effect on human tumor cells, inducing apoptosis and suppressing the proliferation of cultured tumor cells. Enzastaurin treatment also suppresses the phosphorylation of GSK3B ser9 , ribosomal protein S6 S240/244 , and AKT Thr308 . Oral dosing with Enzastaurin to yield plasma concentrations similar to those achieved in clinical trials significantly suppresses the growth of human glioblastoma and colon carcinoma xenografts. As in cultured tumor cells, Enzastaurin treatment suppresses the phosphorylation of GSK3B in these xenograft tumor tissues. Enzastaurin treatment also suppresses GSK3B phosphorylation to a similar extent in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from these treated mice. These data show that Enzastaurin has a direct antitumor effect and that Enzastaurin treatment suppresses GSK3B phosphorylation in both tumor tissue and in PBMCs, suggesting that GSK3B phosphorylation may serve as a reliable pharmacodynamic marker for Enzastaurin activity. With previously published reports, these data support the notion that Enzastaurin suppresses tumor growth through multiple mechanisms: direct suppression of tumor cell proliferation and the induction of tumor cell death coupled to the indirect effect of suppressing tumor-induced angiogenesis.

A B S T R A C T PurposeThis phase III open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of enzastaurin versus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (WHO grade 4). Patients and MethodsPatients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 6-week cycles of enzastaurin 500 mg/d (1,125-mg loading dose, day 1) or lomustine (100 to 130 mg/m 2 , day 1). Assuming a 45% improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), 397 patients were required to provide 80% power to achieve statistical significance at a one-sided level of .025. ResultsEnrollment was terminated at 266 patients (enzastaurin, n ϭ 174; lomustine, n ϭ 92) after a planned interim analysis for futility. Patient characteristics were balanced between arms. Median PFS (1.5 v 1.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] ϭ 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.70), overall survival (6.6 v 7.1 months; HR ϭ 1.20; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.65), and 6-month PFS rate (P ϭ .13) did not differ significantly between enzastaurin and lomustine, respectively. Stable disease occurred in 38.5% and 35.9% of patients and objective response occurred in 2.9% and 4.3% of patients, respectively. Time to deterioration of physical and functional well-being and symptoms did not differ between arms (HR ϭ 1.12; P ϭ .54). Four patients discontinued enzastaurin because of drug-related serious adverse events (AEs). Eleven patients treated with enzastaurin died on study (four because of AEs; one was drug-related). All four deaths that occurred in patients receiving lomustine were disease-related. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were significantly higher with lomustine (46 events) than with enzastaurin (one event; P Յ .001). ConclusionEnzastaurin was well tolerated and had a better hematologic toxicity profile but did not have superior efficacy compared with lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

No abstract

On the basis of plasma exposures and safety data, enzastaurin 525 mg once daily is the recommended phase II dose. Enzastaurin is well tolerated up to 700 mg/d. Evidence of early activity was seen with significant stable disease.

Treatment with enzastaurin was well-tolerated and associated with prolonged FFP in a small subset of patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Further studies of enzastaurin in DLBCL are warranted.

Activation of AKT signaling by PTEN loss or PIK3CA mutations occurs frequently in human cancers, but targeting AKT has been difficult due to the mechanism-based toxicities of inhibitors that target the inactive conformation of AKT. Ipatasertib (GDC-0068) is a novel selective ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of AKT that preferentially targets active phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) and is potent in cell lines with evidence of AKT activation. In this phase I study, ipatasertib was well tolerated; most adverse events were gastrointestinal and grade 1–2 in severity. The exposures of ipatasertib ≥200 mg daily in patients correlated with preclinical TGI90, and pharmacodynamic studies confirmed that multiple targets (i.e., PRAS40, GSK3β, and mTOR) were inhibited in paired on-treatment biopsies. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed; 16 of 52 patients (30%), with diverse solid tumors and who progressed on prior therapies, had radiographic stable disease, and many of their tumors had activation of AKT.

Enzastaurin, a potent inhibitor of protein kinase C-beta, inhibits angiogenesis and has direct cytotoxic activity against glioma cells in preclinical studies. Patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas were stratified by histology and use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs). Patients on EIAED were treated on the phase I dose-escalation portion of the trial with evaluation of serum pharmacokinetics as the primary endpoint. Patients not on EIAED were treated on the phase II portion of the trial with radiographic response and progression-free survival (PFS) as primary objectives. Patients in phase I received enzastaurin 525-900 mg/d. Phase II patients received 500 or 525 mg/d. One hundred and eighteen patients were accrued to this trial. Therapy was well tolerated with thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage, and elevated alanine aminotransferase as the most commonly observed drug-associated grade 3 or higher toxicities. Patients on EIAED had serum enzastaurin exposure levels approximately 80% lower than those not on EIAED. Dose escalations up to 900 mg/d did not substantially increase serum exposure levels and a maximally tolerated dose was never reached. Twenty-one of 84 evaluable patients (25%) experienced an objective radiographic response. The 6-month PFS was 7% for patients with glioblastoma and 16% for patients with anaplastic glioma. Phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was identified as a potential biomarker of drug activity. Enzastaurin has anti-glioma activity in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma, but does not appear to have enough single-agent activity to be useful as monotherapy.