No abstract

Citation for published item:gentifnti @n¡ ee wu£ nozAD vFgF nd prikD FtF @PHHUA 9he reliilityD stilityD nd preditive utility of the selfEreport version of the entisoil roess reening hevieF9D ndinvin journl of psyhologyFD RV @RAF ppF PWWEQIPF Further information on publisher's website:his is the epted version of the following rtileX wu£ nozD vFgF nd prikD F tF @PHHUAD he reliilityD stilityD nd preditive utility of the selfEreport version of the entisoil roess reening hevieF ndinvin tournl of syhologyD RV @RAX PWW!QIPFD whih hs een pulished in (nl form t httpXGGdxFdoiForgGIHFIIIIGjFIRTUEWRSHFPHHUFHHSTHFxF Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. screening, where youth with conduct problems and youth high on psychopathic traits were over-sampled.The sample was reassessed twice at yearly intervals. The self-report scores on the APSD showed moderate correlations with parent ratings of psychopathic traits, were moderately stable across one to two years, and showed significant correlations with measures of antisocial behavior both concurrently and predictively. One major weakness of the self-report ratings was the low internal consistency of the subscales, which were much lower than the internal consistency found on the parent report version of the scale.

Citation for published item:wrseeD wFeF nd frryD gFF nd ghildsD uFuF nd prikD FtF nd uimonisD iFF nd gentifnti @n¡ ee wu£ nozAD vFgF nd euoinD uFtF nd pssnhtD qFwF nd uunimtsuD wFwF nd vuD uFF @PHIIA 9essessing the forms nd funtions of ggression using selfEreport X ftor struture nd invrine of the peer on)it sle in youthsF9D syhologil ssessmentFD PQ @QAF ppF UWPEVHRF Further information on publisher's website: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

The present study investigated differences in the behavioral and psychophysiological responses to provocation and in the level of callous-unemotional traits in boys exhibiting different patterns of aggression. Eighty-five boys (ages 13-18) in a juvenile detention center played a competitive computer task against a hypothetical peer who provided low and high levels of provocation. Youth high on both self-reported reactive and proactive aggression showed different behavioral responses to provocation than youth high on only reactive aggression. Specifically, the combined group showed high levels of aggressive responses without any provocation, whereas the group high on reactive aggression showed an increase in aggressive responding to low provocation. Further, results revealed a trend for the combined group to show lower levels of skin conductance reactivity to low provocation if they were also high on callous-unemotional traits.

Citation for published item:uimonisD iFF nd prikD FtF nd gentifnti @n¡ ee wu£ nozAD vFgF nd euoinD uFtF @PHHVA 9gllousEunemotionl trits nd the emotionl proessing of distress ues in detined oys X testing the moderting role of ggressionD exposure to ommunity violeneD nd histories of useF9D hevelopment psyhopthologyFD PH @PAF ppF STWESVWF Further information on publisher's website: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Callous-unemotional (CU) traits in antisocial youth have been associated with deficits in the processing of emotionally distressing stimuli in a number of past studies. In the current study, we investigated moderators of this association in a sample of 88 ethnically diverse detained boys (mean age ¼ 15.57, SD ¼ 1.28). Overall, emotional processing of distressing stimuli using a dot-probe task was not related to CU traits and there was no moderating effect of ethnicity. However, CU traits were related to deficits in emotional processing in youth high on aggression and youth high on exposure to community violence. Further, youth high on CU traits but with enhanced orienting to distressing stimuli had stronger histories of abuse, supporting the possibility that there may be environmentally influenced pathways in the development of these traits.