As development cycles and prototyping iterations begin to decrease in the aerospace industry, it is important to develop and improve practical methodologies to meet all design metrics. This research presents an efficient methodology that applies high-fidelity multi-disciplinary design optimization techniques to commercial landing gear assemblies, for weight reduction, cost savings, and structural performance dynamic loading. Specifically, a slave link subassembly was selected as the candidate to explore the feasibility of this methodology. The design optimization process utilized in this research was sectioned into three main stages: setup, optimization, and redesign.The first stage involved the creation and characterization of the models used throughout this research. The slave link assembly was modelled with a simplified landing gear test, replicating the behavior of the physical system. Through extensive review of the literature and collaboration with Safran Landing Systems, dynamic and structural behavior for the system were characterized and defined mathematically.Once defined, the characterized behaviors for the slave link assembly were then used to conduct a Multi-Body Dynamic (MBD) analysis to determine the dynamic and structural response of the system. These responses were then utilized in a topology optimization through the use of the Equivalent Static Load Method (ESLM). The results of the optimization were interpreted and later used to generate improved designs in terms of weight, cost, and structural performance under dynamic loading in stage three. The optimized designs were then validated using the model created for the MBD analysis of the baseline design.The design generation process employed two different approaches for post-processing the topology results produced. The first approach implemented a close replication of the topology results, resulting in a design with an overall peak stress increase of 74%, weight savings of 67%, and no apparent cost savings due to complex features present in the design. The second design approach focused on realizing reciprocating benefits for cost and weight savings. As a result, this design was able to achieve an overall peak stress increase of 6%, weight and cost savings of 36%, and 60%, respectively.

The ever-present drive for increasingly high-performance designs realized on shorter timelines has fostered the need for computational design generation tools such as topology optimization. However, topology optimization has always posed the challenge of generating difficult, if not impossible to manufacture designs. The recent proliferation of additive manufacturing technologies provides a solution to this challenge. The integration of these technologies undoubtedly has the potential for significant impact in the world of mechanical design and engineering. This work presents a new methodology which mathematically considers additive manufacturing cost and build time alongside the structural performance of a component during the topology optimization procedure. Two geometric factors, namely, the surface area and support volume required for the design, are found to correlate to cost and build time and are controlled through the topology optimization procedure. A novel methodology to consider each of these factors dynamically during the topology optimization procedure is presented. The methodology, based largely on the use of the spatial gradient of the density field, is developed in such a way that it does not leverage the finite element discretization scheme. This work investigates a problem that has not yet been explored in the literature: direct minimization of support material volume in density-based topology optimization. The entire methodology is formulated in a smooth and differentiable manner, and the sensitivity expressions required by gradient based optimization solvers are presented. A series of example problems are provided to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed methodology.

As the field of design for additive manufacturing continues to evolve and accelerate towards admitting more robust designs requiring fewer instances of user-intervention, we will see the conventional design cycle evolve dramatically. However, to fully take advantage of this emerging technology — particularly with respect to large scale manufacturing operations — considerations of productivity from a fiscal perspective are sure to become of the utmost importance. A mathematical model incorporating the cost and time factors associated with additive manufacturing processes has been developed and implemented as a multi-weighted single-objective topology optimization algorithm. The aforementioned factors have been identified as component surface area and volume of support material. These quantities are optimized alongside compliance, producing a design tool that gives the user the option to choose the relative weighting of performance over cost. In two academic examples, minimization of compliance alongside surface area and support structure volume yield geometries demonstrating that considerable decreases in support material in particular can be achieved without sacrificing significant part compliance.

No abstract