Investigation of pulmonary gas exchange efficacy usually requires arterial blood gas analysis (aBGA) to determine arterial partial pressure of oxygen (mPaO2) and compute the Riley alveolar-to-arterial oxygen difference (A-aDO2); that is a demanding and invasive procedure. A noninvasive approach (AGM100), allowing the calculation of PaO2 (cPaO2) derived from pulse oximetry (SpO2), has been developed, but this has not been validated in a large cohort of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Our aim was to conduct a validation study of the AG100 in hypoxemic moderate-to-severe COPD. Concurrent measurements of cPaO2 (AGM100) and mPaO2 (EPOC, portable aBGA device) were performed in 131 moderate-to-severe COPD patients (mean ±SD FEV1: 60 ± 10% of predicted value) and low-altitude residents, becoming hypoxemic (i.e., SpO2 < 94%) during a short stay at 3100 m (Too-Ashu, Kyrgyzstan). Agreements between cPaO2 (AGM100) and mPaO2 (EPOC) and between the O2-deficit (calculated as the difference between end-tidal pressure of O2 and cPaO2 by the AGM100) and Riley A-aDO2 were assessed. Mean bias (±SD) between cPaO2 and mPaO2 was 2.0 ± 4.6 mmHg (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.2 to 2.8 mmHg) with 95% limits of agreement (LoA): −7.1 to 11.1 mmHg. In multivariable analysis, larger body mass index (p = 0.046), an increase in SpO2 (p < 0.001), and an increase in PaCO2-PETCO2 difference (p < 0.001) were associated with imprecision (i.e., the discrepancy between cPaO2 and mPaO2). The positive predictive value of cPaO2 to detect severe hypoxemia (i.e., PaO2 ≤ 55 mmHg) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.98) with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.77 (95% CI: 1.71 to 8.33). The mean bias between O2-deficit and A-aDO2 was 6.2 ± 5.5 mmHg (95% CI: 5.3 to 7.2 mmHg; 95%LoA: −4.5 to 17.0 mmHg). AGM100 provided an accurate estimate of PaO2 in hypoxemic patients with COPD, but the precision for individual values was modest. This device is promising for noninvasive assessment of pulmonary gas exchange efficacy in COPD patients.
Purpose Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are particularly vulnerable to hypoxia-induced autonomic dysregulation. Hypoxemia is marked during sleep. In COPD, altitude exposure is associated with an increase in blood pressure (BP) and a decrease in baroreflex-sensitivity (BRS). Whether nocturnal oxygen therapy (NOT) may mitigate these cardiovascular autonomic changes in COPD at altitude is unknown. Materials and Methods In a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial, 32 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD living <800 m were subsequently allocated to NOT and placebo during acute exposure to altitude. Measurements were done at low altitude at 490 m and during two stays at 2048 m on NOT (3 L/min) and placebo (3 L/min, ambient air) via nasal cannula. Allocation and intervention sequences were randomized. Outcomes of interest were BP, BRS (from beat-to-beat BP measurement), BP variability (BPV), and heart rate. Results About 23/32 patients finished the trial per protocol (mean (SD) age 66 (5) y, FEV 1 62 (14) % predicted) and 9/32 experienced altitude-related illnesses (8 vs 1, p < 0.05 placebo vs NOT). NOT significantly mitigated the altitude-induced increase in systolic BP compared to placebo (Δ median −5.8 [95% CI −22.2 to −1.4] mmHg, p = 0.05) but not diastolic BP (−3.5 [95% CI −12.6 to 3.0] mmHg; p = 0.21) or BPV. BRS at altitude was significantly higher in NOT than in placebo (1.7 [95% CI 0.3 to 3.4] ms/mmHg, p = 0.02). Conclusion NOT may protect from hypoxia-induced autonomic dysregulation upon altitude exposure in COPD and thus protect from a relevant increase in BP and decrease in BRS. NOT may provide cardiovascular benefits in COPD during conditions of increased hypoxemia and may be considered in COPD travelling to altitude.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.