The implementation of front‐of‐pack labelling to assist consumers in making healthier food choices requires an appropriate Nutritional Profile Model (NPM) to be defined. However, four different models have been proposed in Brazil: the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), the Brazilian Association of Food Industries (ABIA) and National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) less (1) and more restrictive (2) models. The present study aimed to use the information provided on the labels of eight ultra‐processed food categories selected from the most popular group of foods targeted at Brazilian children, to score critical nutrient levels according to the four different NPMs and compare the proportion of products categorised as ‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low’ according to each one. Labels (n = 409) were collected in supermarkets in Belo Horizonte‐MG, Brazil. Data were tabulated, and a comparison of the ‘high’ content of the four nutrients, total sugars, total and saturated fats and sodium, according to the four NPMs, was performed. Agreement between ‘high’, ‘medium’ and ‘low’ scores according to the different NPMs, in comparison with the PAHO model, was performed using the Kappa test. Of all ‘fruit’ drinks, 95% were considered as ‘high’ in total sugars by the PAHO model, while only 5% were categorised as ‘high’ by the ABIA and ANVISA 1 models. For total sugars, no product in the cakes, breakfast cereals and yogurts categories and only 5.7% of the sandwich cookies were categorised as ‘high’ by the ABIA model, while 100% of sandwich cookies were categorised as having a ‘high’ total sugars content by the PAHO and ANVISA models. Similar findings were observed for breakfast cereals, yogurts and corn snacks for the proportion of products scoring ‘high’ for saturated fats and sodium. Kappa's concordance analysis showed moderate to excellent agreement between the PAHO and ANVISA 2 models. It was observed that the PAHO model indicated more foods with a ‘high’ content of critical nutrients. We conclude that the ABIA model is more permissive when compared to the other models and the PAHO model more restrictive.

O consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados pode ser especialmente prejudicial na infância, uma vez que as crianças são consideradas mais vulneráveis aos efeitos dos aditivos alimentares. Objetivou-se avaliar, de acordo com a informação presente nos rótulos, os tipos de aditivos alimentares presentes em alimentos destinados ao público infantil. Trata-se de estudo transversal, descritivo, no qual se compilou os tipos de aditivos presentes na lista de ingredientes de oito categorias (bebidas com sabor de frutas, bebidas lácteas, biscoitos recheados, bolos, cereais matinais, gelatinas, salgadinhos de milho e iogurtes) de produtos com apelo infantil (n= 409) coletados em supermercados de Belo Horizonte–MG, durante segundo semestre de 2018. Apenas 19 (4,6%) produtos não possuíam algum tipo de aditivo. As categorias dos bolos (8,3±2,1) e das gelatinas (8,3±1,2) apresentaram maior média de aditivos e a categoria dos cereais matinais, menor (2,2±1,6). Os aditivos alimentares mais encontrados foram: aromatizantes (79%; n=323), corantes (56%; n=229) e emulsificantes (36%; n=148). Conclui-se que os alimentos voltados ao público infantil possuem, em sua maioria, pelo menos um tipo de aditivo alimentar. Foram encontradas majoritariamente as classes dos aromatizantes, corantes e emulsificantes nos produtos avaliados.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate food labels targeted at children and identify the concomitant presence of claims and high levels of critical nutrients and/or the presence of sweeteners. As a secondary objective, it aimed to list different types of claims and check which marketing strategies are most used. Methods: We collected 409 products, from 8 popular food groups targeted at children, in Brazilian market (i.e., fruit drinks, dairy drinks, sandwich cookies, cakes, breakfast cereals, jellies, corn snacks, and yogurts). The contents of critical nutrients (e.g., sugar, total fat, saturated fat, and trans-fat, and sodium) and presence/absence of sweetener were calculated, considering Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) parameters. Then, we verified the presence and types of claims in these products. Results: Overall, 265 (64.7%) labels presented claims. In three of the eight categories (i.e., breakfast cereals, dairy drinks, and yogurt), all products with claims (50, 34, and 34 products, respectively) had one or more nutrients in harmful concentrations (critical nutrients above PAHO’s nutritional profile and/or presence of sweeteners). In the other categories, only one product (of 63 sandwich cookies and 26 breakfast cereals with claims) and three products (of 22 cakes and 28 jellies with claims) had no nutrient in critical concentration. The presence of claims, like “rich/source” of micronutrient, was predominant in seven of the eight food groups. Conclusion: In the present study, there was a high presence of claims, of different types, in foods targeted at children, which, for the most part, also have excess of at least one critical nutrient, according to PAHO.

Nutrient profiling is the science of classifying or ranking foods according to their nutritional composition, for reasons related to disease prevention and health promotion. To be effective, policies such as front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FoPNL) must have an adequate nutritional profile model, since it will determine which products will be eligible to receive a FoPNL. This study aimed to determine the percentage of packaged food and drink products available in Brazil that would be subject to FoPNL under two different legislations: Brazilian and Mexican. This is a cross-sectional study in which we collected information on food products (photos of the ingredients list, the front label, the barcode, and the nutrition facts table) from one of the largest stores of a supermarket chain in the city of Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil, from March to May 2021 (~6 months after the publication of the Brazilian legislation about FoPNL and a year and a half before the legislation came into force). The products were classified in relation to the BNPM (added sugars, saturated fats, and sodium) and the MNPM (energy, free sugars, saturated fats, trans fats, sodium, non-sugar sweeteners, and caffeine). A total of 3384 products were collected and, after applying the exclusion criteria, 3,335 products were evaluated. Of these, 2,901 would be eligible to receive FoPNL in Brazil and 2,914 would be eligible to receive FoPNL in Mexico. According to the BNPM, 56.7% (95% CI 54.9; 58.5%) of the products were “high in” critical nutrients, 27.1% (95% CI 25.5; 28.7%) of the products in added sugars, 26.7% (95% CI 25.2; 28.4%) of the products in saturated fats, and 21.4% (95% CI 19.9; 22.9%) of the products in sodium. As for the MNPM, 96.8% (95% CI 96.1; 97.4%) of them were “high in” up to five critical nutrients and up to two warning rectangles (caffeine and non-sugar sweeteners), 45.8% (95% CI 44.0; 47.6%) of them in free sugars, 43.7% (95% CI 41.9; 45.5%) of them in saturated fats, and 47.9% (95% CI 46.1; 49.7%) of them in sodium. We concluded that the eligibility to receive FoPNL by BNPM and MNPM was relatively similar between products; however, almost all products would have at least one FoPNL and/or warning rectangles according to Mexican legislation, and nearly half of them would have at least one FoPNL, considering BNPM. The MNPM is much more restrictive than the BNPM. The Nutrient Profile Model (NPM) that regulates FoPNL, and other health policies, must be carefully defined to ensure that foods are properly classified according to their healthiness.

Rationale Intake of sugary beverages has been associated with obesity and chronic non-communicable diseases, thereby increasing the direct health costs related to these diseases. Front-of-package nutrition labeling (FoPNL) aims to help consumers understand food composition, thereby improving food choices and preventing the development of such diseases. Objective To estimate, over five years, the impact of implementing FoPNL in Brazil on the prevalence of excess body weight and obesity in adults who consume sugary beverages and the direct costs related to such problems. Methods A simulation study to performed to estimate the effect of FoPNL implementation on the prevalence of excess body weight and obesity. The VIGITEL research database (2019), published in the 2020 report, was used in this study (the final sample consisted of 12,471 data points representing 14,380,032 Brazilians). The scenarios were considered: base (trend in sugary beverage intake); 1 (base scenario associated with the changes in energy content of the purchased beverages observed after the first phase of the Chilean labeling law (−9.9%); and 2 (scenario 1 associated with reformulation of beverages, total energy reduction of −1.6%). Changes in body weight were estimated using the simulation model of Hall et al. (2011) over five years. A linear trend in the prevalence of obesity and excess body weight in the Brazilian population was considered. The impact of the prevalence of obesity and excess body weight on body mass index was estimated. In addition, the direct health costs related to obesity were estimated. Results Energy consumption from sugary beverages after FoPNL implementation is expected to be reduced by approximately 28 kcal/day (95% CI, −30 to −27) considering scenario 1. In scenarios 1 and 2, without FoPNL, the prevalence of obesity and excess body weight over five years was estimated to be 25.3% and 25.2%, and 64.4% and 64.2%, respectively. By extrapolating the results to the entire Brazilian population, it was observed that the implementation of FoPNL may reduce the prevalence of obesity by −0.32 percentage points and −0.35 percentage points (scenario 1 and 2, respectively) and excess body weight by −0.42 percentage points and −0.48 percentage points (scenarios 1 and 2, respectively) in five years. It is estimated that after five years of implementation, it will be possible to save approximately US$ 5,5 millions (95% CI 4,7 to 8,8) in scenario 1, reaching approximately US$ 6,1 millions (95% CI 5,3 to 9,8) in scenario 2. Conclusion The results of this modeling study indicate that FoPNL may reduce prevalence of excess body weight and obesity, representing strategic public policies for obesity prevention.

O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar, de forma qualitativa e quantitativa, o cardápio oferecido durante três meses para as idosas residentes de uma Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos (ILPI), que fica localizada na cidade de Belo Horizonte – Minas Gerais. Para realizar a avaliação do cardápio utilizou-se o método de Avaliação Qualitativa de Preparações do Cardápio (AQPC), que é um método de avaliação global e permite uma análise geral das técnicas de cocção empregadas nas preparações. Já para realizar a avaliação da aceitação, pelas idosas, dos cardápios oferecidos dentro da ILPI, utilizou-se os cálculos de resto ingestão. Como resultado dessas análises foi possível observar um elevado valor de resto ingestão (obtendo-se média de 47,61g ± 24,68), o que demonstrou a necessidade de uma reformulação dos cardápios, além de implementação de ações dentro da Unidade de Produção de Refeições (UPR) para que os cardápios sejam elaborados de modo a se adequar ao público, buscando-se maneiras para que as refeições cheguem à mesa com uma aparência mais atrativa. Sendo assim, tornam-se necessários alguns treinamentos e oficinas com as cuidadoras, cozinheiras e demais funcionários responsáveis pelo cuidado das idosas da ILPI, bem como a realização de um livro de receitas elaborado com as idosas, buscando solucionar os problemas encontrados na instituição.