Patients with functional motor disorder (FMD) are commonly seen by physiotherapists and there is growing evidence to support a physical rehabilitation approach. There are, however, few descriptions in the literature of the content of successful physiotherapy treatment. This prospective cohort study reports the practicalities and outcomes of a pilot 5-day physiotherapy programme. Patients were referred from a specialist movement disorders clinic. The treatment consisted of education and movement retraining, with a long-term self-management focus. Education and movement retraining was based on a pathophysiological model for FMD that stresses the importance of self-focussed attention and illness belief. Patients were assessed at baseline, end of treatment and 3-month follow-up. 47 patients completed the programme, mean symptom duration was 5.5 years, 64 % were unemployed due to ill health. At the end of treatment, 65 % rated their symptoms as "very much improved" or "much improved", this reduced to 55 % at 3 months. At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in physical domains of the SF-36, Berg Balance Scale and 10 Metre Timed Walk. Measures of mental health did not change. This prospective cohort study adds to the growing evidence that supports the use of specialist physiotherapy treatment for FMD. Improvements here were made despite the cohort having characteristics associated with poor prognosis. We argue that specific treatment techniques are important and have the potential to improve physical function, quality of life and may prove to be a cost-effective treatment for selected patients with FMD.

No abstract

Functional (psychogenic) movement disorders are a common source of disability and distress. Despite this, little systematic evidence is available to guide treatment decisions. This situation is likely to have been influenced by the "no man's land" that such patients occupy between neurologists and psychiatrists, often with neither side feeling a clear responsibility or ability to direct management. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current state of the evidence regarding management of functional movement disorders. This reveals that there is some evidence to support the use of specific forms of cognitive behavioral therapy and physiotherapy. Such treatments may be facilitated in selected patients with the use of antidepressant medication, and may be more effective for those with severe symptoms when given as part of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Other treatments, for example hypnosis and transcranial magnetic stimulation, are of interest, but further evidence is required regarding mechanism of effect and long-term benefit. Though prognosis is poor in general, improvement in symptoms is possible in patients with functional movement disorders, and there is a clear challenge to clinicians and therapists involved in their care to conduct and advocate for high-quality clinical trials.

Background The Psychogenic Movement Disorders Rating Scale (PMDRS) has potential as a useful objective assessment in clinical research, but the current scale has limitations. We developed a simplified version (S‐FMDRS) and assessed inter‐rater reliability, concurrent validity, and sensitivity. Methods Fifty‐two videos of subjects with functional (psychogenic) movement disorders (FMD) were rated according to the PMDRS and S‐FMDRS by three neurologists. Inter‐rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement of symptomatic body regions and movement disorder classification was assessed using Light's kappa. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess concurrent validity. A physiotherapist also rated videos on the S‐FMDRS. The simplified scale was piloted in a feasibility study of physiotherapy for FMD to assess sensitivity. Results ICC of total scores was 0.84 for the original scale and 0.85 for the simplified scale. Light's kappa for agreement of symptomatic body regions and movement disorder classification was moderate to low. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by Spearman's correlation between the two scales ranging from 0.84 to 0.95. The simplified scale was sensitive to change, with an effect size in the feasibility study of 0.79. Inter‐rater reliability between physiotherapist and neurologist was high (ICC 0.85). Discussion Both versions of the scale had good inter‐rater reliability for the total score. Low agreement on movement disorder classification and identification of symptomatic body regions support our argument for a simplified scale. Conclusions The S‐FMDRS has high inter‐rater reliability and good sensitivity to change. Further psychometric evaluation is warranted.