A fusion between fibronectin 1 (FN1) and activin receptor 2A (ACVR2A) has been reported previously in isolated cases of the synovial chondromatosis. To analyse further and validate the findings, we performed FISH and demonstrated recurrent FN1-ACVR2A rearrangements in synovial chondromatosis (57%), and chondrosarcoma secondary to synovial chondromatosis (75%), showing that FN1 and/or AVCRA2 gene rearrangements do not distinguish between benign and malignant synovial chondromatosis. RNA sequencing revealed the presence of the FN1-ACVR2A fusion in several cases that were negative by FISH suggesting that the true prevalence of this fusion is potentially higher than 57%. In soft tissue chondromas, FN1 alterations were detected by FISH in 50% of cases but no ACVR2A alterations were identified. RNA sequencing identified a fusion involving FN1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in a case of soft tissue chondroma and FISH confirmed recurrent involvement of both FGFR1 and FGFR2. These fusions were present in a subset of soft tissue chondromas characterised by grungy calcification a feature reminiscent of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour. However, unlike the latter, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) mRNA expression was not elevated in soft tissue chondromas harbouring the FN1-FGFR1 fusion. The mutual exclusivity of ACVR2A rearrangements observed in synovial chondromatosis and FGFR1/2 in soft tissue chondromas suggests these represent separate entities. There have been no reports of malignant soft tissue chondromas, therefore differentiating these lesions will potentially alter clinical management by allowing soft tissue chondromas to be managed more conservatively.
e16664 Background: Gene fusions involving one of the 3 neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinases ( NTRK) have been identified in approximately 1% of solid tumors and inhibitors of TRK have been shown to have anti-tumor activity regardless of tumor type. NTRK gene fusions have been previously reported in bilio-pancreatic tumors. It is of interest therefore to determine incidence and molecular characteristics of NTRK gene fusions in these patients. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival blocks from surgical resections, biopsies or cytological samples of biliary tract tumors (BTC) including intra-hepatic (IH), extra-hepatic (EH), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PH) and gallbladder tumors (G), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) were retrieved from the tumor bank of CUB Hôpital Erasme between JAN 2010 and OCT 2019. A two-step diagnostic method incorporating immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by NGS analysis was used. Pan–TRK IHC (monoclonal antibody clone EPR17341 [AbCam, Cambridge, MA]) was used for the screening method. Staining intensity (negative, weak, moderate or strong) pattern (diffuse, focal or rare positive cells), and localization (cytoplasmic or nuclear) were evaluated. The presence of at least weak staining tumor cells led to testing by a RNA-based NGS panel (Oncomine Focus Assay ThermoFisher Scientific). Results: For BTC, 162 archival tumors samples have been selected. 149 samples were suitable to perform IHC.17 samples were IHC positive including 9 IH, 3 PH, 2 EH and 3 G tumor samples. Intensity of staining was weak in 16 samples and moderate in one. Staining location was cytoplasmic (14/17), nuclear (2/17), and nuclear+cytoplasmic (1/17). Pattern of staining was rare positive cells (2/17), focal (4/17) and diffuse (11/17). NGS testing of the 17 IHC positive samples revealed a single NTRK3 gene fusion ( ETV6(4)- NTRK3(14)). In this PH tumor, IHC had a weak focal cytoplasmic and nuclear staining. Overall in the patients screened by IHC and confirmed by NGS, percentage of NTRK fusions was 0.67 %. For PA, 319 archival tumor samples have been selected and 297 were suitable for IHC. 19 samples were IHC positive. Intensity of staining was weak in 18 samples and moderate in one. Staining location was cytoplasmic (18/19) and nuclear (1/19). Pattern of staining was focal in 2 cases and diffuse in 17 cases. No fusion was detected by NGS. Conclusions: NTRK gene fusions are rare in bilio-pancreatic cancers but testing is of high interest due to the emergence of possible treatment with specific TRK inhibitors. These results support the use of NGS to confirm positive IHC results during diagnostic screening.
Background It is of interest to determine the incidence and molecular characteristics of NTRK gene fusions in patients with bilio-pancreatic cancers, because of possible treatment with TRK inhibitors for advanced tumors. The aim of the present study was to apply the guidelines for NTRK testing algorithm to a series of patients with bilio-pancreatic cancers. Methods Immunohistochemistry screening was applied on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival blocks from surgical resections, biopsies, or cytological samples of biliary tract and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The presence of at least a weak staining in rare tumor cells led to testing by 2 RNA-based NGS panels. Results For biliary tract tumors, 153 samples have been selected. A total of 140 samples were suitable to perform IHC, and 17 samples were IHC positive. RNA NGS testing of the 17 IHC-positive samples revealed a single NTRK3 gene fusion (ETV6(4)-NTRK3(14)) that was detected by both NGS panels. In this perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, IHC performed on a biopsy showed a weak focal cytoplasmic and nuclear staining. No other NTRK fusion was detected on the 16 other samples with both panels. Overall in the patients screened by IHC and confirmed by NGS, the percentage of NTRK fusions was 0.7%. For pancreatic cancers, 319 samples have been selected and 297 were suitable to perform IHC. Nineteen samples were IHC positive. No fusion was detected by NGS. Conclusion NTRK gene fusions are rare in bilio-pancreatic cancers but testing is of high interest due to possible treatment with specific TRK inhibitors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.