Aims: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Spain and identify the level of undiagnosed disease and its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and activities of daily living (ADL). Methods: A population-based sample of 4274 adults aged 40-80 years was surveyed. They were invited to answer a questionnaire and undergo prebrochodilator and postbronchodilator spirometry. COPD was defined as a postbronchodilator FEV 1 /FVC (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity) ratio of ,0.70. Results: For 3802 participants with good-quality postbronchodilator spirometry, the overall prevalence of COPD was 10.2% (95% CI 9.2% to 11.1%) and was higher in men (15.1%) than in women (5.6%). The prevalence of COPD stage II or higher was 4.4% (95%CI; 3.8%-5.1%). The prevalence of COPD increased with age and with cigarette smoking and was higher in those with a low educational level. A previous diagnosis of COPD was reported by only 27% of those with COPD. Diagnosed patients had more severe disease, higher cumulative tobacco consumption and more severely impaired HRQL compared with undiagnosed subjects. However, even patients with undiagnosed COPD stage I+ already showed impairment in HRQL and in some aspects of ADL compared with participants without COPD. Conclusions: The prevalence of COPD in individuals between 40 and 80 years of age in Spain is 10.2% and increases with age, tobacco consumption and lower educational levels. The rate of diagnosised COPD is very high and undiagnosed individuals with COPD already have a significant impairment in HRQL and ADL.
In this population-based study, 17.4% of the individuals identified with COPD had an overlap COPD-asthma phenotype. This patient subgroup had more dyspnea, wheezing, exacerbations, worse respiratory-specific quality of life, and reduced levels of physical activity. Specific interventions may be required to adequately care for this subgroup of patients.
BackgroundElevated circulating levels of several inflammatory biomarkers have been described in selected patient populations with COPD, although less is known about their population-based distribution. The aims of this study were to compare the levels of several systemic biomarkers between stable COPD patients and healthy subjects from a population-based sample, and to assess their distribution according to clinical variables.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study design of participants in the EPI-SCAN study (40-80 years of age). Subjects with any other condition associated with an inflammatory process were excluded. COPD was defined as a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70. The reference group was made of non-COPD subjects without respiratory symptoms, associated diseases or prescription of medication. Subjects were evaluated with quality-of-life questionnaires, spirometry and 6-minute walk tests. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukins (IL-6 and IL-8), alpha1-antitrypsin, fibrinogen, albumin and nitrites/nitrates (NOx) were measured.ResultsWe compared 324 COPD patients and 110 reference subjects. After adjusting for gender, age, BMI and tobacco consumption, COPD patients showed higher levels of CRP (0.477 ± 0.023 vs. 0.376 ± 0.041 log mg/L, p = 0.049), TNF-α (13.12 ± 0.59 vs. 10.47 ± 1.06 pg/mL, p = 0.033), IL-8 (7.56 ± 0.63 vs. 3.57 ± 1.13 pg/ml; p = 0.033) and NOx (1.42 ± 0.01 vs. 1.36 ± 0.02 log nmol/l; p = 0.048) than controls. In COPD patients, serum concentrations of some biomarkers were related to severity and their exercise tolerance was related to serum concentrations of CRP, IL-6, IL-8, fibrinogen and albumin.ConclusionsOur results provide population-based evidence that COPD is independently associated with low-grade systemic inflammation, with a different inflammatory pattern than that observed in healthy subjects.
Downgraded (-1) due to unclear risk of bias related to allocation concealment (9 studies), as well as high risk of bias in blinding of outcome assessment (6 studies). 2 Downgraded (-1) due to unclear risk of bias related to allocation concealment (5 studies), as well as high risk of bias in blinding of outcome assessment (2 studies), and (-1) due to imprecision since the 95% CI 0.68 to 1.41 could lead to opposite recommendations. 3 Downgraded (-1) due to unclear risk of bias related to allocation concealment (12 studies), as well as high risk of bias in blinding of outcome assessment (7 studies). xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 5 Posture and fluids for preventing post-dural puncture headache (Review)
We aimed to describe changes in the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Spain by means of a repeated cross-sectional design comparing two population-based studies conducted 10 yrs apart.We compared participants from IBERPOC (Estudio epidemiológico de EPOC en España) (n54,030), conducted in 1997, with those of EPI-SCAN (Epidemiologic Study of COPD in Spain) (n53,802), conducted in 2007. Poorly reversible airflow obstruction compatible with COPD was defined according to the old European Respiratory Society definitions.COPD prevalence in the population between 40 to 69 yrs of age dropped from 9.1% (95% CI 8.1-10.2%) in 1997 to 4.5% (95% CI 2.4-6.6%), a 50.4% decline. The distribution of COPD prevalence by severity also changed from 38.3% mild, 39.7% moderate and 22.0% severe in 1997, to 85.6% mild, 13.0% moderate and 1.4% severe in 2007, and in the 40-69 yr EPI-SCAN sub-sample to 84.3% mild, 15.0% moderate and 0.7% severe. Overall, underdiagnosis was reduced from 78% to 73% (not a significant difference) and undertreatment from 81% to 54% (p,0.05) within this 10-yr frame.The finding of a substantial reduction in the prevalence of COPD in Spain is unexpected, as were the observed changes in the severity distribution, and highlights the difficulties in comparisons between repeated cross-sectional surveys of spirometry in the population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.