Because of its protein-denaturing ability, urea has played a pivotal role in the experimental and conceptual understanding of protein folding and unfolding. The measure of urea's ability to force a protein to unfold is given by the m value, an experimental quantity giving the free energy change for unfolding per molar urea. With the aid of Tanford's transfer model [Tanford C (1964) J Am Chem Soc 86:2050 -2059], we use newly obtained group transfer free energies (GTFEs) of protein side-chain and backbone units from water to 1 M urea to account for the m value of urea, and the method reveals the anatomy of protein denaturation in terms of residue-level free energy contributions of groups newly exposed on denaturation. The GTFEs were obtained by accounting for solubility and activity coefficient ratios accompanying the transfer of glycine from water to 1 M urea. Contrary to the opinions of some researchers, the GTFEs show that urea does not denature proteins through favorable interactions with nonpolar side chains; what drives urea-induced protein unfolding is the large favorable interaction of urea with the peptide backbone. Although the m value is said to be proportional to surface area newly exposed on denaturation, only Ϸ25% of the area favorably contributes to unfolding (because of newly exposed backbone units), with Ϸ75% modestly opposing urea-induced denaturation (originating from side-chain exposure). Use of the transfer model and newly determined GTFEs achieves the long-sought goal of predicting urea-dependent cooperative protein unfolding energetics at the level of individual amino acid residues. m value ͉ transfer free energy ͉ transfer model ͉ activity coefficient ͉ self-avoiding random coil U nderstanding the energetics of protein-solute interactions is one of the most elusive goals of protein science, with urea-induced denaturation serving as a long-standing reminder of the inability to experimentally account for such fundamental interactions in a detailed manner. More than 40 years ago, Tanford set out to identify the sites and free energies of urea interaction with protein groups in enough detail to account for the energetics of urea-induced denaturation (1-3). In principle, the transfer model he developed provides a means of dissecting which groups (side chain and backbone) are involved in denaturation and how much they contribute to the free energy of denaturation by urea. For the transfer model (see Scheme 1) to be successful, two requirements must be met: (i) accurate transfer free energy changes for side-chain and backbone groups must be known, and (ii) the free energy of transfer of a native or denatured state of a protein from water to the urea solution must be equal to the sum of the transfer free energy contributions of its solvent-exposed parts. Of these two requirements, the ability to obtain accurate transfer free energies of side chains and backbone groups has been a particularly difficult impediment to quantifying the energetics of urea-induced denaturation. Here, we present results fo...

In adaptation biology the discovery of intracellular osmolyte molecules that in some cases reach molar levels, raises questions of how they influence protein thermodynamics. We’ve addressed such questions using the premise that from atomic coordinates, the transfer free energy of a native protein (ΔGtr,N) can be predicted by summing measured water-to-osmolyte transfer free energies of the protein’s solvent exposed side chain and backbone component parts. ΔGtr,D is predicted using a self avoiding random coil model for the protein, and ΔGtr,D − ΔGtr,N, predicts the m-value, a quantity that measures the osmolyte effect on the N ⇌ D transition. Using literature and newly measured m-values we show 1:1 correspondence between predicted and measured m-values covering a range of 12 kcal/mol/M in protein stability for 46 proteins and 9 different osmolytes. Osmolytes present a range of side chain and backbone effects on N and D solubility and protein stability key to their biological roles.

Mixtures of organic osmolytes occur in cells of many organisms, raising the question of whether their actions on protein stability are independent or synergistic. To investigate this question it is desirable to develop a system that permits evaluation of the effect of one osmolyte on the efficacy of another to either force-fold or denature a protein. A means of evaluating the efficacy of an osmolyte is provided by its m-value, an experimental quantity that measures the ability of the osmolyte to force a protein to unfold or fold. An experimental system is presented that enables evaluations of the m-values of osmolytes in the presence and absence of a second osmolyte. The experimental system involves use of a marginally stable protein in 10 mM buffer (pH 7, 200 mM salt, and 34°C) that is at the midpoint of its native to denatured transition. These conditions enable determination of m-values for protecting and denaturing osmolytes in the presence and absence of a second osmolyte, permitting assessment of the extent to which the two osmolytes affect each other's efficacy. The two osmolytes investigated in this work are the denaturing osmolyte, urea, and the protecting osmolyte, sarcosine. Results show unequivocally that neither osmolyte alters the efficacy of the other in forcing the protein to fold or unfold-the osmolytes act independently on the protein despite their combined concentrations being in the multi-molar range. These osmolytes avoid altering one another's efficacy at these high concentrations because the number of osmolyte interaction sites on the protein is large and the binding constants are quite small. Consequently, the site occupancies are low enough in number that the two osmolytes neither compete nor cooperate in interacting with the protein.

Edited by Gianni CesareniKeywords: nc886 PKR Double-stranded RNA Protein-RNA interaction Vault RNA a b s t r a c tWe have recently shown that nc886 (pre-miR-886 or vtRNA2-1) is not a genuine microRNA precursor nor a vault RNA, but a novel type of non-coding RNA that represses PKR, a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) dependent kinase. Here we have characterized their direct physical association. PKR's two RNA binding domains form a specific and stable complex with nc886's central portion, without any preference to its 5 0 -end structure. By binding to PKR with a comparable affinity, nc886 competes with dsRNA and attenuates PKR activation by dsRNA. Our data suggest that nc886 sets a threshold for PKR activation so that it occurs only during genuine viral infection but not by a minute level of fortuitous cellular dsRNA.

Using osmolyte cosolvents, we show that hydrogen-bonding contributions can be separated from hydrophobic interactions in the denatured state ensemble (DSE). Specifically, the effects of urea and the protecting osmolytes sarcosine and TMAO are reported on the thermally unfolded DSE of Nank4−7*, a truncated notch ankyrin protein. The high thermal energy of this state in the presence and absence of 6 M urea or 1 M sarcosine solution is sufficient to allow large changes in the hydrodynamic radius (Rh) and secondary structure accretion without populating the native state. The CD change at 228 nm is proportional to the inverse of the volume of the DSE, giving a compact species equivalent to a premolten globule in 1 M sarcosine. The same general effects portraying hierarchical folding observed in the DSE at 55 °C are also often seen at room temperature. Analysis of Nank4−7* DSE structural energetics at room temperature as a function of solvent provides rationale for understanding the structural and dimensional effects in terms of how modulation of the solvent alters solvent quality for the peptide backbone. Results show that while the strength of hydrophobic interactions changes little on transferring the DSE from 6 M urea to water and then to 1 M TMAO, backbone−backbone (hydrogen-bonding) interactions are greatly enhanced due to progressively poorer solvent quality for the peptide backbone. Thus, increased intrachain hydrogen bonding guides secondary structure accretion and DSE contraction as solvent quality is decreased. This process is accompanied by increasing hydrophobic contacts as chain contraction gathers hydrophobes into proximity and the declining urea−backbone free energy gradient reaches urea concentrations that are energetically insufficient to keep hydrophobes apart in the DSE.

No abstract

No abstract

NEIL1 [Nei (endonuclease VIII)-like protein 1], one of the five mammalian DNA glycosylases that excise oxidized DNA base lesions in the human genome to initiate base excision repair, contains an intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain (CTD; ∼100 residues), not conserved in its Escherichia coli prototype Nei. Although dispensable for NEIL1's lesion excision and AP lyase activities, this segment is required for efficient in vivo enzymatic activity and may provide an interaction interface for many of NEIL1's interactions with other base excision repair proteins. Here, we show that the CTD interacts with the folded domain in native NEIL1 containing 389 residues. The CTD is poised for local folding in an ordered structure that is induced in the purified fragment by osmolytes. Furthermore, deletion of the disordered tail lacking both Tyr and Trp residues causes a red shift in NEIL1's intrinsic Trp-specific fluorescence, indicating a more solvent-exposed environment for the Trp residues in the truncated protein, which also exhibits reduced stability compared to the native enzyme. These observations are consistent with stabilization of the native NEIL1 structure via intramolecular, mostly electrostatic, interactions that were disrupted by mutating a positively charged (Lysrich) cluster of residues (amino acids 355–360) near the C-terminus. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis confirms the flexibility and dynamic nature of NEIL1's CTD, a feature that may be critical to providing specificity for NEIL1's multiple, functional interactions.