Headache is a major worldwide health problem and the second most common type is migraine, with a global prevalence among adults greater than 10%. Migraine mainly affects adults between 25 and 55 years, during the most productive years of life 1 . In Brazil, the prevalence of migraine is estimated to be 15.2% 2 .Lipton et al. 3 demonstrated that migraine is still underdiagnosed and inappropriately treated. They evaluated 4,376 individuals with headache through a computer-assisted telephone interview survey and 536 individuals had migraine, as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders -2nd edition 4 (ICHD-2). They found that 48% of migraine sufferers had seen a doctor for headache within the last year and 73% of these reported a physician-made diagnosis of migraine. Of all migraine sufferers, 49% were treated with over-the-counter medications, 23% with prescription medication, 23% with both, and 5% with no medications at all 3 .A study by Bigal et al. 5 with 6,006 participants, conducted in the State of São Paulo, Brazil revealed that migraine was the most prevalent primary headache, accounting for 45.1% of patients reporting headache as their only symptom. In another Brazilian study, the correct diagnosis of migraine by non-specialists was made in only 44.9% of migraine sufferers, The diagnosis of headache was made according to the ICHD-2 criteria. Results: Of the 232 patients, 86% had migraine. The questionnaire showed a sensitivity of 92% (95%CI, 88% to 95%), specificity of 60% (95%CI, 43% to 77%) and a positive predictive value of 93% (95%CI, 89% to 96%). Discussion: Our results were similar to other international studies of the ID-Migraine TM application. The Portuguese version is considered easy to use, and an appropriate screening tool for migraine diagnosis in our sample. Conclusion: Considering the characteristics of our health system, we can infer that this questionnaire would be beneficial in a Brazilian primary care setting; however, more studies are necessary.Keywords: migraine disorders; surveys and questionnaires; headache. O questionário apresentou sensibilidade de 92% (IC de 95% 88% a 95%), especificidade de 60% (IC de 95% 43% a 77%) e valor positivo preditivo positivo de 93% (IC 95 89% a 96%). Discussão: Nossos resultados foram similares a outros estudos mundiais de aplicação do ID-Migraine TM . A versão em Português é considerada de fácil utilização, sendo uma ferramenta adequada para triagem diagnóstica de migrânea em nossa amostra. Conclusão: Considerando as características do nosso sistema de saúde, podemos inferir que este questionário seria útil nos serviços primários de saúde brasileiros, porém mais estudos são necessários.Palavras-chave: transtornos de enxaqueca; inquéritos e questionários; cefaleia.