Esophageal manometry has been widely used to diagnose esophageal motility disorders. 1 It is the standard diagnostic tool in nonobstructive dysphagia, as it evaluates both pressures of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and contractility of the esophageal body. An important advancement in the last 20 years has been the introduction of high-resolution manometry (HRM), usually defined as manometry carried out with a catheter with at least 21 channels and with sensors at 1-cm intervals. 2 HRM is swiftly replacing conventional manometry, in which only a limited number of sensors (usually 4 to 8) are used. The generally perceived advantages of HRM over conventional manometry are that positioning of the catheter is less critical and that the interpretation of the recorded pressures, displayed in the form of topographical color-coded plots, is more intuitive. 3
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.