A 50-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for vomit, nausea, diplopia, and headache resistant to analgesic drugs. Symptoms started the day after his third COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Moderna) whereas SARS-CoV-2 nasal swab was negative. Pituitary MRI showed recent bleeding in macroadenoma, consistent with pituitary apoplexy. Adverse Drug Reaction was reported to AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency).A stress dexamethasone dose was administered due to the risk of adrenal insufficiency and to reduce oedema. Biochemistry showed secondary hypogonadism; inflammatory markers were elevated as well as white blood cells count, fibrinogen and D-dimer. Pituitary tumour transsphenoidal resection was performed and pathology report was consistent with pituitary adenoma with focal haemorrhage and necrosis; we found immunohistochemical evidence for SARS-CoV-2 proteins next to pituitary capillaries, in the presence of an evident lymphocyte infiltrate.Few cases of pituitary apoplexy after COVID-19 vaccination and infection have been reported. Several hypotheses have been suggested to explain this clinical picture, including cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and pituitary proteins, COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, infection-driven acutely increased pituitary blood demand, anti-Platelet Factor 4/heparin antibodies development after vaccine administration. Ours is the first case of SARS-CoV-2 evidence in pituitary tissue, suggesting that endothelial infection of pituitary capillaries could be present before vaccination, possibly due to a previous asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our case underlines that SARS-CoV-2 can associate with apoplexy by penetrating the central nervous system, even in cases of negative nasal swab. Patients with pituitary tumours may develop pituitary apoplexy after exposure to SARS-CoV-2, therefore clinicians should be aware of this risk.

Hyperprolactinemia can have different causes: physiological, pharmacological, and pathological. When investigating the etiology of hyperprolactinemia, clinicians need to be aware of several conditions leading to misdiagnosis. The most popular pitfalls are: acute physical and psychological stress, macroprolactin, hook effect, even though antibodies interferences and biotine use have to be considered. A 52-year-old woman was referred to Endocrinology clinic for oligomenorrhoea and headache. She worked as a butcher. Hormonal evaluation showed very high PRL (305 ng/ml, reference interval: <24 ng/ml) measured with the ECLIA immunoassay analyzer Elecsys 170. The patient’s pituitary MRI was normal and macroprolactin was normal. Hormonal workup showed LH: 71.5 mU/ml (2–10.9 mU/ml), FSH: 111.4 mU/ml (3.9–8.8 mU/ml), Estradiol: 110.7 pg/mL (27–122 pg/ml). Since an interference was suspected, the sample was sent to another laboratory using a different assay. After antibody blocking tubes treatment (Heterophilic Blocking Tube, Scantibodies) PRL was 28.8 ng/ml (reference interval < 29.2 ng/ml). Analytical interference should be suspected when assay results are not consistent with the clinical picture. Endogenous antibodies (EA) include heterophile, human anti-animal, autoimmune and other nonspecific antibodies, and rheumatoid factors, that have structural similarities and can cross-react with the antibodies employed by the immunoassay, causing hyperprolactinemia misdiagnosis. The patient’s job (butcher), led us to suspect the presence of anti-animal antibodies. Clinicians should also carefully investigate the use of supplements. Biotin can falsely increase hormone concentration in competitive assays. Many clinicians are still not informed about these pitfalls that are not mentioned in some recent reviews on PRL measurement.

The isoenzyme pattern of N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase (NAG) in serum and urine was studied in two groups of patients with diabetes mellitus and in 30 control subjects. Total NAG activity was significantly (P less than 0.001) increased in the serum and urine of the 20 diabetics with vascular complications, but was insignificantly increased in the 20 diabetics without vascular complications. Ion-exchange chromatography demonstrated the presence of two major isoenzymes of NAG, A and B. The proportion of isoenzyme A activity always exceeded that of isoenzyme B. The proportion of isoenzyme B in serum of diabetics was lower than in controls; the reverse was true for urine of diabetics. The NAG isoenzymes pattern may provide additional diagnostic information regarding diabetic status and complications of diabetes.

Purpose GH deficit (GHD) could represent an endocrine issue in ß-Thalassemia Major (ßTM) patients. GH/IGF-1 axis has not been extensively explored in ßTM adults, so far. We aim to assess GHD and IGF-1 deficiency prevalence in ßTM adult population, focusing on the relationship with liver disease. Methods Cross-sectional multi-centre study conducted on 81 adult ßTM patients (44 males, mean age 41 ± 8 years) on transfusion and chelation therapy. GHD was investigated by GHRH + arginine test. IGF-1 levels, routine biochemical exams, Fibroscan, Hepatic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and pituitary MRI were collected. Results Eighteen patients were affected by GHD and 63 were not (nGHD) according to GHRH + arginine test, while basal GH levels did not differ. GHD was associated with a higher BMI and a worse lipid profile (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed regarding liver function between the two groups. Pituitary MRI scan was normal except for one case of empty sella. The 94.4% and 93.6% of GHD and nGHD, respectively, presented lower IGF-1 levels than the reference range, and mean IGF-1 SDS was significantly lower in GHD patients. Conclusion GHD is frequent in adult ßTM patients and is associated with higher BMI and worse lipid profile. nGHD patients present lower IGF-1 levels as well. There was no relationship between IGF-1 levels and liver disease. Further, multicentric studies with larger cohorts and standardized diagnostic protocols are needed.

We used a liquid-chromatographic method to measure xanthine, hypoxanthine, and inosine in plasma of uremic patients before and after hemodialysis. The concentrations of all three were higher than in normal subjects. After dialysis treatment, the values were significantly lower than before dialysis, but still above normal.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract