Background:The direct comparison of CA19.9, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has never been performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours (SPTs).Methods:We included 68 patients with a SPT referred for EUS-FNA. CTCs were analysed using size-based platform and ctDNA using digital PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were evaluated for each marker and their combination.Results:SPTs corresponded to 58 malignant tumours (52 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) and 6 others) and 10 benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity for PA diagnosis were 73% and 88% for EUS-FNA, 67% and 80% for CTC, 65% and 75% for ctDNA and 79% and 93% for CA19.9, respectively. The positivity of at least 2 markers was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 91%, respectively. CtDNA was the only marker associated with overall survival (median 5.2 months for ctDNA+ vs 11.0 months for ctDNA−, P=0.01).Conclusions:CA19.9 alone and in combination with ctDNA and/or CTC analysis may represent an efficient method for diagnosing PA in patients with SPTs. Further studies including a larger cohort of patients with both malignant and benign lesions will be necessary to confirm these promising results.

PurposeTo assess the prognostic and predictive value of circulating ESR1 mutation and its kinetics before and after progression on aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment.Patients and methodsESR1 circulating D538G and Y537S/N/C mutations were retrospectively analyzed by digital droplet PCR after first-line AI failure in patients treated consecutively from 2010 to 2012 for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to circulating mutational status and subsequent lines of treatment. The kinetics of ESR1 mutation before (3 and 6 months) and after (3 months) AI progression were determined in the available archive plasmas.ResultsCirculating ESR1 mutations were found at AI progression in 44/144 patients included (30.6%). Median follow-up from AI initiation was 40 months (range 4-94). The median OS was decreased in patients with circulating ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (15.5 versus 23.8 months, P=0.0006). The median PFS was also significantly decreased in patients with ESR1 mutation than in patients without mutation (5.9 vs 7 months, P=0.002). After AI failure, there was no difference in outcome for patients receiving chemotherapy (n = 58) versus non-AI endocrine therapy (n=51) in patients with and without ESR1 mutation. ESR1 circulating mutations were detectable in 75% of all cases before AI progression, whereas the kinetics 3 months after progression did not correlate with outcome.ConclusionESR1 circulating mutations are independent risk factors for poor outcome after AI failure, and are frequently detectable before clinical progression. Interventional studies based on ESR1 circulating status are warranted.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive and heterogeneous malignancy harboring frequent targetable activating somatic mutations. Emerging evidence suggests that circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can be used to detect somatic variants in DLBCL using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) experiments. In this proof-of-concept study, we chose to develop simple and valuable digital PCR (dPCR) assays for the detection of recurrent exportin-1 (XPO1) E571K, EZH2 Y641N, and MYD88 L265P mutations in DLBCL patients, thereby identifying patients most likely to potentially benefit from targeted therapies. We demonstrated that our dPCR assays were sufficiently sensitive to detect rare XPO1, EZH2, and MYD88 mutations in plasma cfDNA, with a sensitivity of 0.05%. cfDNA somatic mutation detection by dPCR seems to be a promising technique in the management of DLBCL, in addition to NGS experiments.

Background Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs is currently the reference COVID-19 diagnosis method but exhibits imperfect sensitivity. Methods We developed a multiplex reverse transcription-digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR) assay, targeting six SARS-CoV-2 genomic regions, and evaluated it on nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples collected from 130 COVID-19 positive or negative ambulatory individuals, who presented symptoms suggestive of mild or moderate SARS-CoV2 infection. Results For the nasopharyngeal swab samples, the results obtained using the 6-plex RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR assays were all concordant. The 6-plex RT-ddPCR assay was more sensitive than RT-qPCR (85% versus 62%) on saliva samples from patients with positive nasopharyngeal swabs. Conclusion Multiplex RT-ddPCR represents an alternative and complementary tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19, in particular to control RT-qPCR ambiguous results. It can also be applied to saliva for repetitive sampling and testing individuals for whom nasopharyngeal swabbing is not possible.

No abstract

Aims: Secretory carcinoma (SC) is characterized by ETV6 rearrangements, most often ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Given its histologic overlap with other salivary gland tumors (SGTs), SCs can be difficult to diagnose without genetic confirmation. A recently developed pan‐TRK (tropomyosin receptor kinase) antibody shows promise for identifying tumors with NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 3) fusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of pan‐TRK immunohistochemistry in distinguishing SCs from mimics and selecting patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials. We examined whole‐tissue sections from 111 SGTs with molecular characterization, including 26 SCs (23 with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and 3 with ETV6-RET fusion detected by ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing and 85 non-SC SGTs (no ETV6-NTRK3 fusion). Immunohistochemistry was performed with a pan‐TRK rabbit monoclonal antibody. When any pan‐TRK staining (nuclear or cytoplasmic with any staining intensity) was considered to indicate positivity, 22 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (95.7%) and 33 of 85 non‐SC (38.8%) salivary neoplasms were positive, mainly basal cell adenoma, pleomorphic adenomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas. All SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. When only nuclear pan-TRK staining with any staining intensity was considered positive, 18 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (78.3%) were positive, 11 among them with diffuse staining (>30% of cells). All non-SCs and SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. In comparison to molecular analysis (ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing), nuclear pan-TRK IHC has a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, 69% and 100% for SCs (all fusions). Pan-TRK is a reasonable screening test for diagnosing SCs among SGTs when taking only nuclear staining into account. Although pan-TRK expression is not entirely sensitive for SCs, nuclear staining is highly specific for SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. The lack of pan-TRK immunoreactivity in a subset of SCs is suggestive of atypical exons 4 to 14 or exons 5 to 14 ETV6-NTRK3 fusion or non-NTRK alternative fusion partners such as ETV6-RET. Pan-TRK staining can serve as a strong diagnostic marker to distinguish SC from it mimics and to select patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials.

No abstract

The clinical implications of plasmatic cell-free and tumor DNA (cfDNA and ctDNA) are challenging in glioblastoma. This prospective study included 52 consecutive newly diagnosed glioblastoma (n = 49) or gliosarcoma (n = 3) patients treated with concomitant temozolomide and radiotherapy (RT-TMZ), followed by a TMZ maintenance phase. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, before RT-TMZ (pre-RT-TMZ) and at the end of adjuvant TMZ, or at the time of progression in cases of progressive disease (PD). The cfDNA concentration was measured with a fluorometric method, and ctDNA was detected using targeted droplet digital PCR. The main objectives were to analyze the associations between cfDNA and ctDNA measurements during the course of treatment with PD and survival. There was a significant decrease in median cfDNA concentration from baseline to pre-RT-TMZ—19.4 versus 9.7 ng/mL (p < 0.0001)—in the entire cohort. In patients with PD, a significant increase in cfDNA concentration from pre-RT-TMZ to time of PD was observed, from 9.7 versus 13.1 ng/mL (p = 0.037), respectively, while no difference was observed for nonprogressive patients. Neither the cfDNA concentration at baseline nor its kinetics correlated with survival. ctDNA was detected in 2 patients (3.8%) and only in gliosarcoma subtypes. Trial registration ClinicalTrial, NCT02617745. Registered 1 December 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617745?term=glioplak&draw=2&rank=1.