Several small case-control studies have investigated whether factor V Leiden (FVL) is a risk factor for retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and generated conflicting data. To clarify this question we performed a large two-centre case-control study and a meta-analysis of published studies. Two hundred seven consecutive patients with RVO and a control group of 150 subjects were screened between 1996 and 2006. A systematic meta-analysis was done combining our study with further 17 published European case-control studies. APC resistance was detected in 16 out of 207 (7.7%) patients and eight out of 150 (5.3%) controls. The odds ratio (OR) estimated was 1.49 with a (non-significant) 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.62-3.57. The meta-analysis including 18 studies with a total of 1,748 patients and 2,716 controls showed a significantly higher prevalence of FVL in patients with RVO compared to healthy controls (combined OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.19-2.32). All single studies combined in the meta-analysis were too small to reliably detect the effect individually. This explains the seemingly contradictory data in the literature. In conclusion, the prevalence of APC resistance (and FVL) is increased in patients with RVO compared to controls, but the effect is only moderate. Therefore, there is no indication for general screening of factor V mutation in all patients with RVO. We recommend this test to be performed in patients older than 50 years with an additional history of thromboembolic event and in younger patients without general risk factors like hypertension.

No abstract

The effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on laboratory tests dependent on the production of their targets, factor IIa and factor Xa (FXa), is a well-known problem and can cause both false positive and negative results. Therefore, the correct interpretation of tests performed in patients receiving DOACs is necessary to avoid misclassification and subsequent clinical consequences. However, even with significant experience, there are situations where it is not possible to assess the influence of some methods. Particularly important is the situation in the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants using the dilute Russell viper venom timetest, which is based on direct FXa activation. A very promising solution to this situation is offered by the DOAC laboratory balancing procedure DOAC-Stop. For evaluating the effectiveness of this procedure, 60 (20 apixaban, 20 dabigatran, and 20 rivaroxaban) patients treated with DOACs were enrolled. All patient samples were analyzed for the presence of individual DOAC types and subsequently subjected to the DOAC-Stop procedure.We evaluated its effectiveness by our own high-performance liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometrymethod, which simultaneously sets all high-sensitivity DOACs. Unlike coagulation tests based on the determination of the residual effects of DOACs on target enzymes, which is complicated by extensive interindividual variation, this methodology is highly specific and sensitive.The DOAC-Stop procedure eliminated dabigatran from 99.5%, rivaroxaban from 97.9%, and apixaban from 97.1% of participants in our group. Residual amounts did not exceed 2.7 ng/mL for dabigatran, 10.9 ng/mL for rivaroxaban, or 13.03 ng/mL for apixaban, which are safe values that do not affect either screening or special coagulation tests.

No abstract

No abstract

Pulmonary vein ablations cause an increased systemic procoagulant state as reflected by fibrin turnover, fibrinolysis activation and endothelial perturbation. The activation of the coagulation cascade could be decreased by early heparin administration.

aBackground. Stroke and acute myocardial infarction are the leading causes of death and disability in industrialized countries. Multiple interactions exist between the various forms of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and risk factors for development of stroke and major cardiovascular events are similar. There is currently no clear link between acute coronary syndrome and stroke, although it has been repeatedly described. In addition, there are currently no clear recommendations for how to proceed in the case of signs of myocardial damage in patients with acute stroke and how to manage the next follow-up. Methods-Design. In this prospective observational trial, 500 consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted at the Comprehensive Stroke Center will be enrolled within 12 h from stroke onset. The set of examinations will consist of: 1) Acute brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging 2) Laboratory tests: A) within 12 h from stroke onset: NT pro B-type of natriuretic peptide, pro-atrial natriuretic peptide, creatinekinase MB, troponin T (cTnT), interleukin 6, procalcitonin, high sensitive C-reactive protein and D-dimers. B) control level of cTnT after 4 h from admission C) nonacute laboratory samples within 60 h from stroke onset: glycated haemoglobine, serum lipids; 3) Electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission and 4 h from stroke onset; 4) Transesophageal or transthoracal echocardiography and 24-h ECGHolter within 15 days from stroke onset; 5) Neurosonological examination within 60 h from stroke onset; 6) Thirty patients with a positive finding of acute myocardial ischemia (ECG, cTnT) will be examined by coronary angiography (CAG); 7) Epidemiological data will be acquired. Statistics. The epidemiological characteristics of the whole sample of patients; correlation between differences between group of cardioembolic ischemic stroke patients and group of patients with ischemic stroke of another etiology; correlation of infarction volume on DWI-MRI with the level of cTnT; correlation of the ECG findings with the level of cTnT and clinical signs; correlation of the CAG findings with level of cTnT and ECG findings will be statistically evaluated at the 5% level of statistical significance. Conclusion. The main goal of the project is to improve identification of patients with acute coronary syndrome and with concurrent acute ischemic stroke as these patients require specific treatment and secondary prevention of ischemic events. Trial registration. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01541163.

No abstract