Students who drop out of their science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) majors commonly report that they lack skills critical to STEM learning and career pursuits. Many training programs exist to develop students’ learning skills and they typically achieve small to medium effects on behaviors and performance. However, these programs require large investments of students’ and instructors’ time and effort, which limits their applicability to large lecture course formats commonly employed in early undergraduate STEM coursework. This study examined whether brief, digital training modules designed to help students apply learning strategies and self-regulated learning principles effectively in their STEM courses can impact students’ behaviors and performance in a large biology lecture course. Results indicate that a 2-hr Science of Learning to Learn training had significant effects on students’ use of resources for planning, monitoring, and strategy use, and improved scores on quizzes and exams. These findings indicate that a brief, self-guided, online training can increase desirable learning behaviors and improve STEM performance with minimal cost to learners or instructors. Implications for future design of interventions and their provision to students in need of support are discussed.

No abstract

Many science, engineering, technology, and math (STEM) majors fail to complete their degrees, and those who leave report they lack learning skills required for STEM coursework. In 2 studies, we examined the effects on students’ exam performances when they were assigned to complete a brief digital learning skills training program we embedded into their course site on the university learning management system for their large lecture science and math courses. Study 1 examined whether delivering brief trainings that teach learning skills to students directly within their STEM course site during the first weeks of class would encourage undergraduate science learners to adopt effective learning behaviors and improve their achievement on exams. Additional analyses examined benefits to a group underrepresented in the STEM workforce: first-generation college students. Students who spent time completing training made greater use of resources supporting planning, monitoring, and cognitive strategy use and outperformed students in the control group on initial and final exams. Study 2 examined whether the same, domain-general learning skill training could produce effects when placed in a college algebra course. Random assignment to treatment and control was conducted early in the second course unit. Those in the skill training condition outperformed a control group who solved additional algebra problems on the next 2 unit exams. Across studies, effects of training were similar for first-generation and continuing generation students. However, the effects obtained often improved the exam scores of first-generation students from below to above the minimum score which requires course reenrollment and delays STEM degree completion.

No abstract