Covalent modification of histones is fundamental in orchestrating chromatin dynamics and transcription. One example of such an epigenetic mark is the mono-ubiquitination of histones, which mainly occurs at histone H2A and H2B. Ubiquitination of histone H2A has been implicated in polycomb-mediated transcriptional silencing. However, the precise role of the ubiquitin mark during silencing is still elusive. Here we show in human cell lines that ZRF1 (zuotin-related factor 1) is specifically recruited to histone H2A when it is ubiquitinated at Lys 119 by means of a novel ubiquitin-interacting domain that is located in the evolutionarily conserved zuotin domain. At the onset of differentiation, ZRF1 specifically displaces polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) from chromatin and facilitates transcriptional activation. A genome-wide mapping of ZRF1, RING1B and H2A-ubiquitin targets revealed its involvement in the regulation of a large set of polycomb target genes, emphasizing the key role ZRF1 has in cell fate decisions. We provide here a model of the molecular mechanism of switching polycomb-repressed genes to an active state.

Differential splicing from the bcl-X gene generates several isoforms with opposite effects on the apoptotic response. To explore the mechanism controlling the balance between the various isoforms, we have characterized the 5 region of the mouse bcl-X gene. We identified three new promoters in addition to the two previously described (Grillot, D. A., M., G.-G., Ekhterae, D., Duan, L., Inohara, N., Ohta, S., Seldin, M. F., and Nú ñ ez, G. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 4750 -4757). These five promoters (P1-P5) would give rise to at least five mRNAs with different 5-untranslated region, all sharing the same translation initiation site. Except for the product of the most proximal promoter (P1), the other mRNAs are generated by alternative splicing of noncoding exons to a common acceptor site located in the first translated exon. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, primer extension, and RNase protection assays demonstrate a tissue-specific pattern of promoter usage. P1 and P2 are active in all tissues analyzed, whereas the other three promoter show tissue-specific activities. P3 is active in spleen, liver, and kidney, P4 is active in uterus and spleen, and P5 is active in spleen, liver, brain, and thymus. We present evidence suggesting that promoter selection influences the outcome of the splice process. Transcripts from P1 generate mainly the mRNA for the long isoform Bcl-X L , whereas transcripts from P2 generate mRNAs for the isoforms Bcl-X L , Bcl-X S , and Bcl-X ␥ and transcripts from P3 yield mainly mRNAs for the isoform Bcl-X ␥ . Our results suggest a key role of promoter choice in determining alternative splicing and, thus, the balance of Bcl-X isoforms.

The antiapoptotic effect of melatonin has been described in several systems. In this study, the antagonistic effect of the methoxyindole on dexamethasone-induced apoptosis in mouse thymocytes was examined. Melatonin decreased both DNA fragmentation, and the number of annexin V-positive cells incubated in the presence of dexamethasone. Analysis of the expression of the members of the Bcl-2 family indicated that the synthetic glucocorticoid increased Bax protein levels without affecting the levels of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Bcl-XS, or Bak. This effect correlated with an increase in thymocytes bax mRNA levels. Dexamethasone also increased the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria. All of these effects were reduced in the presence of melatonin, which was ineffective per se on these parameters. In addition, the involvement of cAMP on glucocorticoid/melatonin antagonism was examined. Both melatonin and dexamethasone decreased the levels of this nucleotide in mouse thymocytes, indicating that the antagonistic action between both hormones involves a cAMP-independent pathway. In summary, the present results suggest that the antiapoptotic effect of melatonin on glucocorticoid-treated thymocytes would be a consequence of an inhibition of the mitochondrial pathway, presumably through the regulation of Bax protein levels.

Bcl-X exists in at least five different isoforms with complex effects on programmed cell death. Glucocorticoids and progestins control bcl-X expression and influence the ratio between bcl-X L (antiapoptotic isoform) and bcl-X S (proapoptotic isoform) in different tissues. The 5-UTR region of the mouse bcl-X gene contains at least five different promoters, which exhibit a tissuespecific pattern of promoter usage. Several mRNAs with different 5-leading exons can be generated upon promoter activation. Here we explore the potential of the various bcl-X gene promoters to be regulated by glucocorticoids or progestins. We found that the region located immediately upstream of promoter 4 (P4) contains two hormone response element (HRE)-like sequences at positions ؊3040 (HRE I) and ؊3001 (HRE II) relative to the translation initiation codon. These HRElike sequences confer hormone responsiveness to a core promoter and bind glucocorticoid or progesterone receptors in vitro. Point mutations of both HREs that prevent steroid receptor binding also eliminate hormonal inducibility. In cells treated with glucocorticoids, the hormone receptor is recruited to the P4 region containing the HREs. Analysis of the products of the endogenous bcl-X in epithelial mammary cells showed that only transcripts originating from P4 increased upon hormone treatment. This observation correlates with the induction of the bcl-X L mRNA, suggesting that P4 is one of the bcl-X promoters responsible for the generation of this antiapoptotic isoform.

No abstract

Runx1 participation in epithelial mammary cells is still under review. Emerging data indicates that Runx1 could be relevant for breast tumor promotion. However, to date no studies have specifically evaluated the functional contribution of Runx1 to control gene expression in mammary epithelial tumor cells. It has been described that Runx1 activity is defined by protein context interaction. Interestingly, Foxp3 is a breast tumor suppressor gene. Here we show that endogenous Runx1 and Foxp3 physically interact in normal mammary cells and this interaction blocks Runx1 transcriptional activity. Furthermore we demonstrate that Runx1 is able to bind to R-spondin 3 (RSPO3) and Gap Junction protein Alpha 1 (GJA1) promoters. This binding upregulates Rspo3 oncogene expression and downregulates GJA1 tumor suppressor gene expression in a Foxp3-dependent manner. Moreover, reduced Runx1 transcriptional activity decreases tumor cell migration properties. Collectively, these data provide evidence of a new mechanism for breast tumor gene expression regulation, in which Runx1 and Foxp3 physically interact to control mammary epithelial cell gene expression fate. Our work suggests for the first time that Runx1 could be involved in breast tumor progression depending on Foxp3 availability.

Human UTX, a member of the Jumonji C family of proteins, associates with mixed-lineage leukemia 3/4 complexes. Stimulation with retinoic acid leads to the recruitment of UTX-containing complexes to HOX genes, which results in demethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 and concomitant methylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Here, we show that UTX interacts with the retinoic acid receptor ␣ (RAR␣) and that this interaction is essential for proper differentiation of leukemic U937 cells in response to retinoic acid. UTX occupies the promoters of several RAR target genes and regulates their transcriptional output by modulating ASH2L complex recruitment. Overexpression of UTX in promyelocytic NB4 cells results in enhanced cellular differentiation upon retinoic acid treatment. Our results show that UTX is important for RAR-mediated transcription and provide insight into the critical role of cross talk between histone H3 lysine 4 methylation and histone H3 lysine 27 demethylation during cellular differentiation.

Steroid receptors were classically described for regulating transcription by binding to target gene promoters. However, genome-wide studies reveal that steroid receptors-binding sites are mainly located at intragenic regions. To determine the role of these sites, we examined the effect of progestins on the transcription of the bcl-x gene, where only intragenic progesterone receptor-binding sites (PRbs) were identified. We found that in response to hormone treatment, the PR is recruited to these sites along with two histone acetyltransferases CREB-binding protein (CBP) and GCN5, leading to an increase in histone H3 and H4 acetylation and to the binding of the SWI/SNF complex. Concomitant, a more relaxed chromatin was detected along bcl-x gene mainly in the regions surrounding the intragenic PRbs. PR also mediated the recruitment of the positive elongation factor pTEFb, favoring RNA polymerase II (Pol II) elongation activity. Together these events promoted the re-distribution of the active Pol II toward the 3′-end of the gene and a decrease in the ratio between proximal and distal transcription. These results suggest a novel mechanism by which PR regulates gene expression by facilitating the proper passage of the polymerase along hormone-dependent genes.