Proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV) may be the best surgical treatment for duodenal ulcer (DU) if their recurrences, due mostly to insufficient denervation, can be reduced. This review demonstrates that direct gastric mucosal pH measurement, when accurately done while performing the surgery (617 cases tested among 928 PGVs), increases the number of successfully completed secretory vagotomies, thereby reducing recurrent DU rates. Comparison with postoperative secretory tests shows that testing for pH levels > 6.4 can be useful to help all surgeons make timely corrections and achieve a complete vagotomy. Aiming for a pH > 6.4, we had only one recurrence among 369 cases (79% follow-up; 5.4 years median trial time).
Proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV) is the operation of choice in duodenal ulcer (DU), in view of its minimal morbidity-mortality. We discuss the number of recurrences (R) involved in this technique; most are the result of insufficient denervation, whereas a few ‘new gastric ulcers’ are due to emptying problems. Only 1 year after our first PGV (1970), we attempted the incorporation of postoperative tests (pH of gastric juice samples) peroperatively. Later it became possible to situate the electrode on the gastric mucosa after passing it down the esophagus. Finally, the electrode was pressed against the mucosa, and a minimum pH of 6.4 was found to define complete denervation. By this criterion, only two Rs (0.4%) were observed in 519 PGVs. An area resisting pH rise was established: in one fifth of cases the preantral region only rises to pH 7 after gastroepiploic nerve sectioning. We carried out a prospective randomized study of PGV + sectioning of the gastroepiploic nerve (Sge), PGV + pH test and PGV alone. The study involved 293 cases (1980), including 269 followed up for an average of 57 months; Rs were observed in 1.4, 1.7 and 10.1% of cases with the first, second and third method, respectively. In our opinion, PGV + Sge with cardiohiatofundolysis may reduce R to under 4 %.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.