The promotion of a physically active lifestyle has become an important issue in health policy in first-world countries. A physically active lifestyle is accompanied by several fitness and health benefits. Individuals with a disability can particularly benefit from an active lifestyle: not only does it reduce the risk for secondary health problems, but all levels of functioning can be influenced positively. The objective of this article is to propose a conceptual model that describes the relationships between physical activity behaviour, its determinants and functioning of people with a disability. The literature was systematically searched for articles considering physical activity and disability, and models relating both topics were looked for in particular. No models were found relating physical activity behaviour, its determinants and functioning in people with a disability. Consequently, a new model, the Physical Activity for people with a Disability (PAD) model, was constructed based on existing models of disability and models of determinants of physical activity behaviour. The starting point was the new WHO Model of Functioning and Disability, part of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which describes the multidimensional aspects of functioning and disability. Physical activity behaviour and its determinants were integrated into the ICF model. The factors determining physical activity were based mainly on those used in the Attitude, Social influence and self-Efficacy (ASE) model. The proposed model can be used as a theoretical framework for future interventions and research on physical activity promotion in the population of people with a disability. The model currently forms the theoretical basis for a large physical activity promotion trial in ten Dutch rehabilitation centres.

No abstract

Selected contractile properties and fatigability of the quadriceps muscle were studied in seven spinal cord–injured (SCI) and 13 able‐bodied control (control) individuals. The SCI muscles demonstrated faster rates of contraction and relaxation than did control muscles and extremely large force oscillation amplitudes in the 10‐Hz signal (65 ± 22% in SCI versus 23 ± 8% in controls). In addition, force loss and slowing of relaxation following repeated fatiguing contractions were greater in SCI compared with controls. The faster contractile properties and greater fatigability of the SCI muscles are in agreement with a characteristic predominance of fast glycolytic muscle fibers. Unexpectedly, the SCI muscles exhibited a force–frequency relationship shifted to the left, most likely as the result of relatively large twitch amplitudes. The results indicate that the contractile properties of large human locomotory muscles can be characterized using the approach described and that the transformation to faster properties consequent upon changes in contractile protein expression following SCI can be assessed. These measurements may be useful to optimize stimulation characteristics for functional electrical stimulation and to monitor training effects induced by electrical stimulation during rehabilitation of paralyzed muscles. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 22: 1249–1256, 1999.

The objective was to review the literature on risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders related to pushing and pulling. The risk factors have been described and evaluated from four perspectives: epidemiology, psychophysics, physiology, and biomechanics. Epidemiological studies have shown, based on cross-sectional data, that pushing and pulling is associated with low back pain. Evidence with respect to complaints of other parts of the musculoskeletal system is lacking. Risk factors have been found to influence the maximum (acceptable) push or pull forces as well as the physiological and mechanical strain on the human body. The risk factors have been divided into: (a) work situation, such as distance, frequency, handle height, and cart weight, (b) actual working method and posture/movement/exerted forces, such as foot distance and velocity, and (c) worker's characteristics, such as body weight. Longitudinal epidemiological studies are needed to relate pushing and pulling to musculoskeletal disorders.

Objective: To assess the occurrence and risk factors for complications following spinal cord injury during and after inpatient rehabilitation. Design: Multicentre longitudinal study. Subjects: A total of 212 persons with a spinal cord injury admitted to specialized rehabilitation centres. Methods: Assessments at the start of active rehabilitation (n = 212), 3 months later (n = 143), at discharge (n = 191) and 1 year after discharge (n = 143). Results: Multi-level random coefficient analyses revealed that complications were common following spinal cord injury. Most subjects reported neurogenic and musculoskeletal pain, or had spasticity at each assessment. During the year after discharge, complications remained common: urinary tract infections and pressure sores affected 49% and 36% of the population, respectively. The degree of pain decreased, whereas the degree of spasticity increased significantly during inpatient rehabilitation. Overall, increased age, increased body mass index, traumatic lesion, tetraplegia, and complete lesion all increased the risk of complications. Conclusion: Complications are common following spinal cord injury. They need specific attention after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and within subpopulations.

No abstract

ABSTRACT. van Drongelen S, van der Woude LH, Janssen TW, Angenot EL, Chadwick EK, Veeger DH. Mechanical load on the upper extremity during wheelchair activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1214-20.Objective: To determine the net moments on the glenohumeral joint and elbow joint during wheelchair activities.Design: Kinematics and external forces were measured during wheelchair activities of daily living (level propulsion, riding on a slope, weight-relief lifting, reaching, negotiating a curb) and processed in an inverse dynamics biomechanic model.Setting: Biomechanics laboratory. Participants: Five able-bodied subjects, 8 subjects with paraplegia, and 4 subjects with tetraplegia.Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Net moments on the glenohumeral joint and elbow joint.Results: Peak shoulder and elbow moments were significantly higher for negotiating a curb and weight-relief lifting than for reaching, level propulsion, and riding on a slope. Overall, the elbow extension moments were significantly lower for subjects with tetraplegia than for those with paraplegia.Conclusions: The net moments during weight-relief lifting and negotiating a curb were high when compared with wheelchair propulsion tasks. Taking the effect of frequency and duration into account, these loads might imply a considerable risk for joint damage in the long term.Key Words: Activities of daily living; Biomechanics; Elbow; Rehabilitation; Shoulder; Wheelchairs. © 2005 by American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationI N HANDRIM WHEELCHAIR USERS, the upper extremities are at serious risk of overuse injuries. Wheelchair use requires continuous use of the upper extremities, not only for mobility but also for transfers, weight-relief lifts, and reaching activities. Studies 1,2 have shown that shoulder pain and impingement frequently occur among people with a spinal cord injury (SCI). Pain is experienced during wheelchair-related activities of daily living (ADLs), such as wheelchair propulsion and performing transfers. Because these activities are essential for functional independence, quality of life, and even the life expectancy of people after an SCI, 3 evaluating the mechanical load on the shoulder is important to an understanding of the mechanisms that may cause upper-extremity joint degeneration. Factors that have been mentioned as contributors to the development of shoulder complaints are the relatively high load and high frequency of this load on the shoulder during wheelchair propulsion. 4 In addition, and possibly even more important, the load on the shoulder during other wheelchairrelated tasks, such as transfers and weight-relief lifts, has been mentioned. [5][6][7] In our study, we used net moments around the elbow and the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) to quantify the mechanical load on those joints. Net joint moments are generally used to analyze (working) conditions and to classify these conditions. 8 To show the high loading at the shoulder, studies 9-12 have ...

No abstract