The present study investigated the effects of different intensities of resistance training (RT) on elbow flexion and leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Thirty men volunteered to participate in an RT programme, performed twice a week for 12 weeks. The study employed a within-subject design, in which one leg and arm trained at 20% 1RM (G20) and the contralateral limb was randomly assigned to one of the three conditions: 40% (G40); 60% (G60), and 80% 1RM (G80). The G20 started RT session with three sets to failure. After G20 training, the number of sets was adjusted for the other contralateral limb conditions with volume-matched. CSA and 1RM were assessed at pre, post-6 weeks, and post-12 weeks. There was time effect for CSA for the vastus lateralis (VL) (8.9%, 20.5%, 20.4%, and 19.5%) and elbow flexors (EF) (11.4%, 25.3%, 25.1%, and 25%) in G20, G40, G60, and G80, respectively (p > .05). G80 showed higher CSA than G20 for VL (19.5% vs. 8.9%) and EF (25% vs. 11.4%) at post-12 weeks (p < .05). There was time effect for elbow flexion and unilateral leg press strength for all groups post-12 weeks (p < .05). However, the magnitude of increase was higher in G60 and G80. In conclusion, when low to high intensities of RT are performed with volume-matched, all intensities were effective for increasing muscle strength and size; however, 20% 1RM was suboptimal in this regard, and only the heavier RT intensity (80% 1RM) was shown superior for increasing strength and CSA compared to low intensities.

Laurentino, GC, Loenneke, JP, Mouser, JG, Buckner, SL, Counts, BR, Dankel, SJ, Jessee, MB, Mattocks, KT, Iared, W, Tavares, LD, Teixeira, EL, and Tricoli, V. Validity of the handheld Doppler to determine lower-limb blood flow restriction pressure for exercise protocols. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2018-Handheld (HH) Doppler is frequently used for determining the arterial occlusion pressure during blood flow restriction exercises; however, it is unknown whether the blood flow is occluded when the auscultatory signal is no longer present. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity between the HH Doppler and the Doppler ultrasound (US) measurements for determining the arterial occlusion pressure in healthy men. Thirty-five participants underwent 2 arterial occlusion pressure measurements. In the first measure, a pressure cuff (17.5 cm wide) was placed at the most proximal region of the thigh and the pulse of posterior tibial artery was detected using an HH Doppler probe. The cuff was inflated until the auscultatory pulse was no longer detected. After 10 minutes of rest, the procedure was repeated with the Doppler US probe placed on the superficial femoral artery. The cuff was inflated up to the point at which the femoral arterial blood flow was interrupted. The point at which the auscultatory pulse and blood flow were no longer detected was deemed the arterial occlusion pressure. There were no significant differences in arterial occlusion pressure level between the HH Doppler and the Doppler US (133 [±18] vs. 135 [±17] mm Hg, p = 0.168). There was a significant correlation (r = 0.938, p = 0.168), reasonable agreement, and a total error of the estimate of 6.0 mm Hg between measurements. Arterial occlusion pressure level determined by the HH Doppler and the Doppler US was similar, providing evidence that the HH Doppler is a valid and practical method.

This study investigated the effects of different reduced strength training (RST) frequencies on half-squat 1 RM and quadriceps cross-sectional area (QCSA). Thirty-three untrained males (24.7 ± 3.9 years; 1.73 ± 0.08 m; 74.6 ± 8.4 kg) underwent a 16-week experimental period (i.e. eight weeks of strength training [ST] followed by additional eight weeks of RST). During the ST period, the participants performed 3-4 sets of 6-12 RM, three sessions/week in half-squat and knee extension exercises. Following ST, the participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: reduced strength training with one (RST1) or two sessions per week (RST2), and ceased training (CT). Both RST1 and RST2 groups had their training frequency and total training volume-load (i.e. RST1 = 50.3% and RST2 = 57.1%) reduced, while the CT group stopped training completely. Half-squat 1 RM (RST1 = 27.9%; RST2 = 26.7%; and CT = 28.4%) and QCSA (RST1 = 6.1%; RST2 = 6.9%; and CT = 5.8%) increased significantly (p < .05) in all groups after eight weeks of ST. No significant changes were observed in 1 RM and QCSA for RST1 and RST2 groups after the RST period, while the CT group demonstrated a decrease in half-squat 1 RM (22.6%) and QCSA (5.4%) when compared to the ST period (p < .05). In conclusion, different RST frequencies applied were able to maintain muscle mass and strength performance obtained over the regular ST period. Thus, it appears that RST frequency does not affect the maintenance of muscle mass and strength in untrained males, as long as volume-load is equated between frequencies.

The purpose of the present study was to compare changes in muscle strength and hypertrophy between volume-equated resistance training (RT) performed 2 versus 3 times per week in trained men. Thirty-six resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups: a split-body training routine (SPLIT) with muscle groups trained twice per week (n = 18) over four weekly sessions, or a total-body routine (TOTAL), with muscle groups being trained three times per week (n = 18) over three weekly sessions. The training intervention lasted 10 weeks. Testing was carried out pre- and post-study to assess maximal muscular strength in the back squat and bench press, and hypertrophic adaptations were assessed by measuring muscle thickness of the elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and quadriceps femoris. Twenty-eight subjects completed the study. Significant pre-to-post intervention increases in upper and lower-body muscular strength occurred in both groups with no significant between-group differences. Furthermore, significant pre-to-post intervention increases in muscle size of the elbow extensors and quadriceps femoris occurred in both groups with no significant between-group differences. No significant pre-to-post changes were observed for the muscle size of elbow flexors both in the SPLIT or TOTAL group. In conclusion, a training frequency of 2 versus 3 days per week produces similar increases in muscular adaptations in trained men over a 10-week training period. Nonetheless, effect size differences favored SPLIT for all hypertrophy measures, indicating a potential benefit for training two versus three days a week when the goal is to maximize gains in muscle mass.

No abstract

RESUMOIndivíduos mais fortes (com nível mais elevado de força máxima, F max ) demonstram menor resistência de força que indivíduos mais fracos (com nível mais baixo de F max ) em uma mesma intensidade relativa. Como o nível de F max influencia a produção de potência, espera-se que sujeitos mais fortes também apresentem uma menor resistência de potência. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência do nível de F max na produção e na resistência de potência durante repetições e séries múltiplas do exercício meio-agachamento. Quarenta e dois sujeitos foram classificados de acordo com o resultado no teste de força dinâmica máxima (1RM) e destes os 10 mais fortes e os 10 mais fracos foram selecionados para participar no estudo. Para avaliar a resistência de potência os dois grupos realizaram 10 séries de seis repetições a 40% e a 60% 1RM na maior velocidade possível. A potência absoluta (PA) e a potência relativa ao peso corporal (PR) desenvolvidas na fase concêntrica do exercício foram medidas. A análise de variância (ANOVA two-way) revelou que os sujeitos mais fortes diminuíram a PA a 60% 1RM a partir da quarta repetição e a PR a partir da quinta repetição. Já os sujeitos mais fracos diminuíram a PA apenas na sexta repetição e mantiveram o rendimento na PR ao longo das 10 séries. Não houve efeito significante na intensidade de 40% 1RM. Isso sugere que sujeitos mais fortes fadigam antes em maiores intensidades de carga. Essa fadiga precoce nos sujeitos mais fortes poderia estar ligada a diferentes fatores associados ao controle da homeostase orgânica como o comportamento da pressão arterial, da atividade eletromiográfica e a proporção de fibras musculares dos tipos I e II.Palavras-chave: fadiga, carga de treinamento, atividade intermitente. ABSTRACTIt seems that stronger subjects present less strength endurance compared to weaker subjects at the same relative intensity. Since the level of maximum strength affects power production, it is also expected that stronger subjects present lower power endurance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of maximum strength on power production and endurance over multiple sets and repetitions of the half-squat exercise. Forty-two subjects were classified according to the result in the 1RM test and the 10 strongest and 10 weakest were selected to participate. In order to evaluate power endurance, both groups performed 10 sets of 6 repetitions at 40% and 60% 1RM as fast as possible. The absolute power (AP) and relative power (RP) (corrected by body weight) developed in half-squat concentric phase were measured. Analysis of variance for repeated measures (Two-Way ANOVA) revealed that the stronger subjects decreased AP from 4th repetition on and RP from 5th repetition on at 60% 1RM. The weakest subjects decreased AP from 6th repetition on and maintained RP production over the ten series. There was no significant effect on 40% 1RM. This result suggests that stronger subjects fatigue first at higher intensities. The early fatigue in stronger subjects could be associated ...

Introdução: A alternância entre segmentos corporais para prescrição do treinamento de força (TF) é amplamente utilizada, entretanto seus efeitos permanecem desconhecidos. Objetivo: Verificar o efeito agudo da manipulação da ordem dos exercícios do TF, alternando segmentos corporais, sobre a força dinâmica máxima (1 RM) de membros inferiores (MMII) e superiores (MMSS), a concentração de lactato sanguíneo [La], a percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) e o volume total de treino (VT). Métodos: Dezoito homens (23,1 ± 3,8 anos; 78,4 ± 8,6 kg; 1,72 ± 0,06 m) executaram três condições de TF: condição A (supino reto, desenvolvimento, rosca Scott, meio-agachamento, leg press, cadeira extensora); condição B (meio-agachamento, leg press, cadeira extensora, supino reto, desenvolvimento, rosca Scott) e condição C (supino reto, meio-agachamento, desenvolvimento, leg press, rosca Scott e cadeira extensora). Os exercícios foram executados com três séries de 10 RM. Os testes de 1 RM para MMII e MMSS foram realizados nas semanas iniciais e após as condições experimentais. Descritores: fadiga; ácido láctico; tolerância ao exercício. (23.1±3.8 years; 78.4±8.6 kg; 1.72±0.06 m) performed three ST conditions: condition A: (bench press, shoulder press, preacher arm curl, half squat, leg press, leg extension); condition B (half squat, leg press, leg extension, bench press, shoulder press, preacher arm curl) and condition C (bench press, half squat, shoulder press, leg press, preacher arm curl, leg extension (16,169.4 ± 2,562.5 kg) was higher than conditions A (13,222.2 ± 2,010.4 kg) and B (13,989.8 ± 2223.4 kg) (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The results suggest that only TV and the metabolic demand were more affected by the order of exercises. ABSTRACT Introduction: The alternation between body segments for prescription of strength training (ST) is widely used; however, its effects remain unknown. Objective: To verify the acute effect of the manipulation of the order of ST exercises, alternating body segments, on the maximum dynamic force (1 RM) of lower limbs (LL) and upper limbs (UL), blood lactate [La] concentration, subjective perception of effort (SPE) and the total training volume (TV). Methods: Eighteen men

An accurate method for quantifying associated metabolic cost has yet to be developed for a strength training session (ST). The aim of this study was to quantify the energy expenditure (EE) in an ST session composed of eight exercises at moderate intensity using indirect calorimetry and, from the values obtained, develop a prediction equation for estimating EE. Fifteen males (22.9 ± 2.61 years old), with at least 12 months of experience in ST performed one session of strength training composed of 8 exercises. Three sets of repetitions were performed until concentric failure for each exercise at 75% of 1-repetition maximum (75% of 1RM). The model demonstrated that session time and load volume of ST was a significant predictor of EE (p < 0.05). We found that the energy cost of an ST session at an intensity of 75% of 1RM could be predicted using the equation of Y' = −473.595 + −1.2110(X 1) + 17.5723(X 2) (R 2 = 0.61, p < 0.05). Where X 1 = load-volume (no. of sets x no. of repetitions); X 2 = session time (minutes). Although our equation may have limited accuracy, our regression formula accounted for 61% of the variability in a strength training session at a moderate intensity of 75% of 1RM. Session time in the total variability of EE in ST was an important consideration.