Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) parts are joined mainly using adhesive bonding because, differently from fastening, additional parts (hence weight saving) and through holes (that are always detrimental for the strength due to the possibility of developing damage into the composite) are not necessary. Additionally, it allows for large connection areas, thus distributing stresses better than fastened connections. However, since CFRP can be joined by co-curing, the choice of bonding has to be evaluated as an alternative by a trade-off in terms of strength and durability, compared to cost and manufacturing time and complexity. In this work, a comparison between co-cured and co-bonded CFRP is done with respect to tensile strength and mode I and mode II fracture toughness, in order to understand whether cobonding guarantees the same performance of a co-cured composite part.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.