Background In osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), blood supply is insufficient for the metabolic requirements of the bone. The initial management is conservative, and, in case of failure, surgery is indicated. Osteotomies aim to change the spatial position of the necrotic portion of the femoral head. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of osteotomies for ONFH. Source of data The systematic review, organized, conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar. We analysed outcomes in term of Harris Hip Score, leg shortening, secondary collapse and blood loss. We also verified the percentage of patients who required total hip replacement (THR) after osteotomy for ONFH. Areas of agreement A total of 16 articles were selected, including 775 patients and 852 osteotomies [curved varus osteotomy in 369 (43.3%) patients; transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy in 435 (51.05%) patients; half wedge osteotomy in 48 (5.6%) patients]. There was an overall THR conversion rate of 31.5% (268 hips on 852 osteotomies). Areas of controversy There were no prospective randomized trials, and the outcome measures employed were often heterogeneous. Growing points Approximately one-third of the osteotomies performed in cases of ONFH are converted to THR over a period of ~7 years. In older patients, primary THR should be considered, especially as the conversion to THR after osteotomy is technically demanding. Areas timely for developing research Randomized clinical studies should be conducted in order to define the parameters of the patient that can direct towards the most suitable osteotomic technique.
Background Hip fractures are common in elderly patients, in whom it is important to monitor blood loss; however, unnecessary transfusions should be avoided. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether the employment of a dedicated orthogeriatrician in an Orthopaedic Department allows to optimise the clinical conditions of patients, influencing blood loss and consequently the number of transfusions. The secondary objective was to determine whether the influence of the orthogeriatrician differs according to the type of surgical treatment. Methods A total of 620 elderly patients treated for hip fracture were included in the study. These patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or not of the orthogeriatrician. For each patient, age, sex, comorbidities, type of fracture, surgical treatment, length of hospital stay, time from hospitalisation and surgery, time from surgery to discharge, haemoglobin (Hb) values (admission, 24h post-surgery, lowest Hb reached, discharge) and the number of transfusions were recorded. Results Regardless of the surgical procedure performed, in patients managed by the orthogeriatrician, the Hb at discharge was significantly higher (p = 0.003). In addition to the highest Hb at discharge, in patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty, the number of transfusions per patient is significantly reduced (p = 0.03). Conclusion The introduction of the orthogeriatrician in an orthopaedic ward for the management of elderly patients treated for hip fracture allows to discharge the patients with higher Hb values, reducing the risk of anemisation and the costs related to possible re-admission.
Background A major complication of total hip arthroplasty is dislocation. The hip joint capsule can be incised and repaired, or can be excised. Sources of data We performed a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines focusing on capsular repair and capsulectomy. Areas of agreement We identified 31 articles (17 272 patients). Capsular repair produced a lower blood loss (465.2 vs 709.2 ml), and the procedure lasted 102.5 vs 96.08 min in patients who underwent capsulectomy. The patients undergoing capsulectomy experienced a dislocation rate of 3.06%, whereas in the patients undergoing capsular repair, the dislocation rate was 0.65%. Areas of controversy Most studies are retrospective observational studies, with no prospective randomized trials. Growing points Capsular preservation is association with a lower dislocation rate and a lower blood loss. Capsular excision does take statistically less time, but it is uncertain how a 6 min difference is clinically relevant. Areas timely for developing research Appropriately powered randomized clinical trials should be conducted to better define the association between the chosen implants, approach and outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.