Hypertension constitutes a major risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HFpEF is a prevalent clinical syndrome with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Specific guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HFpEF is not established due to lack of positive outcome data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and limitations of available studies. Although available evidence is limited, control of blood pressure (BP) is widely regarded as central to the prevention and clinical care in HFpEF. Thus, in current guidelines including the 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Guidelines, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with either angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers provides the backbone of BP-lowering therapy in hypertensive patients. Although superiority of RAS blockers has not been clearly shown in dedicated RCTs designed for HFpEF, we propose that this core drug treatment strategy is also applicable for hypertensive patients with HFpEF with the addition of some modifications. The latter apply to the use of spironolactone apart from the treatment of resistant hypertension and the use of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. In addition, novel agents such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, currently already indicated for high-risk patients with diabetes to reduce heart failure hospitalizations, and finerenone represent promising therapies and results from ongoing RCTs are eagerly awaited. The development of an effective and practical classification of HFpEF phenotypes and GDMT through dedicated high-quality RCTs are major unmet needs in hypertension research and calls for action.

The assessment of arterial stiffness, a common feature of aging, exacerbated by pathological conditions like hypertension, has become an attractive tool for identifying structural and functional changes of the arteries even in an early stage of the atherosclerotic disease. Arterial stiffness has been recognized as an important physio-pathological determinant for the age-related rise in systolic blood pressure, demonstrating also an independent predictive value for cardiovascular events. In the recent decades, many techniques and indices to evaluate vascular stiffness have been developed and extensive data concerning their prognostic value have been collected. Moreover, it has become clear that vessel and heart must be considered as a unique system, in which combined stiffness of vessel and heart interacts to limit cardiovascular performance. In this review, main methods and indices used to estimate arterial and ventricular stiffness are presented, focusing on their alteration in physiological aging and arterial hypertension. Furthermore, the concept of ventricular-arterial coupling is explained in order to give an insight to the interplay between arterial and ventricular stiffness in aging and hypertension.

Aims The aims of the present study were to explore whether a long‐term intervention with dietary nitrate [(NO3−), a potential tolerance‐free source of beneficial vasoactive nitric oxide] and spironolactone (to oppose aldosterone's potential deleterious cardiovascular effects) improve cardiac structure/function, independently of blood pressure (BP), in patients with/at risk of type 2 diabetes (a population at risk of heart failure). Methods A subsample of participants in our double‐blind, randomized, factorial‐design intervention (VaSera) trial of active beetroot juice as a nitrate source (≤11.2 mmol) or placebo (nitrate depleted) beetroot juice, and either ≤50 mg spironolactone or ≤16 mg doxazosin (control), had transthoracic cardiac ultrasounds at baseline (n = 105), and at 3 months and 6 months (n = 87) after the start of the intervention. Analysis was by modified intent‐to‐treat. Results Nitrate‐containing juice (n = 40) decreased left ventricular (LV) end‐diastolic volume {−6.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) –11.1, –1.6] ml} and end‐systolic volume [−3.2 (95% CI −5.9, –0.5) ml], and increased end‐diastolic mass/volume ratio [+0.04 (95% CI 0.00, 0.07)], relative to placebo juice (n = 47). Spironolactone (n = 44) reduced relative wall thickness compared with doxazosin (n = 43) [−0.01 (95% CI −0.02, –0.00)]. Although spironolactone reduced LV mass index relative to baseline [−1.48 (95% CI −2.08, –0.88) g m–2.7], there was no difference vs. doxazosin [−0.85 (95% CI −1.76, 0.05) g m–2.7]. Spironolactone also decreased the E/A ratio [−0.12 (95% CI −0.19, –0.04)] and increased S′ (a tissue‐Doppler systolic function index) by 0.52 (95% CI 0.05, 1.0) cm s–1. BP did not differ between the juices, or between the drugs. Conclusions Six months' dietary nitrate decreased LV volumes ~5%, representing new, sustained, BP‐independent benefits on cardiac structure, extending mechanisms characterized in preclinical models of heart failure. Spironolactone's effects on cardiac remodelling and systolic–diastolic function, although confirmatory, were independent of BP.

No abstract

Aims:To test if spironolactone or dietary nitrate from beetroot juice could reduce arterial stiffness as aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVart), a potential treatment target, independently of blood pressure. Methods:Daily spironolactone (≤50 mg) vs doxazosin (control ≤16 mg) and 70 mL beetroot juice (Beet-It ≤11 mmol nitrate) vs nitrate-depleted juice (placebo; 0 mmol nitrate) were tested in people at risk or with type-2 diabetes using a double-blind, 6-month factorial trial. Vascular indices (baseline, 12, 24 weeks) were cardiac-ankle vascular index (CAVI), a nominally pressure-independent stiffness measure (primary outcome), PWVart secondary, central systolic pressure and augmentation. Analysis was intention-to-treat, adjusted for systolic pressure differences between trial arms.Results: Spironolactone did not reduce stiffness, with evidence for reduced CAVI on doxazosin rather than spironolactone (mean difference [95% confidence interval]; 0.25 [−0.3, 0.5] units, P = .080), firmer for PWVart (0.37 [0.01, 0.7] m/s, P = .045). There was no difference in systolic pressure reduction between spironolactone and doxazosin (0.7 [−4.8, 3.3] mmHg, P = .7). Circulating nitrate and nitrite increased on active vs placebo juice, with central systolic pressure lowered −2.6 [−4.5, − 0.8] mmHg, P = .007 more on the active juice, but did not reduce CAVI, PWVart or peripheral pressure. Change in nitrate and nitrite concentrations were 1.5-fold [1.1-2.2] and 2.2-fold [1.3, 3.6] higher on spironolactone than on doxazosin respectively; both P < .05.Conclusion: Contrary to our hypothesis, in at-risk/type 2 diabetes patients, spironolactone did not reduce arterial stiffness, rather PWVart was lower on doxazosin.Dietary nitrate elevated plasma nitrite, selectively lowering central systolic pressure, observed previously for nitrite.PI statement: The authors confirm that the Principal Investigator for this paper is Professor J.K. Cruickshank and that he had direct clinical responsibility for patients.Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN25003627

Europe’s population is becoming increasingly ethnically diverse, and epidemiological studies indicate that there are remarkable differences in cardio-metabolic risk factors between ethnic groups living in the same area. Variations observed in the distribution of cardiovascular risk factors in these communities may therefore help explain—at least in part—the different burdens on cardiovascular diseases. So far, the underlying pathophysiology leading to ethnic variations in the prevalence of cardio-metabolic risk factors is still poorly understood but it is likely to represent the complex interactions from several innate and environmental factors. Tailored prevention and treatment strategies should therefore be implemented in those “high-risk populations,” but data derived from randomized clinical trials are still limited. This article will provide an overview on the role of ethnicity on cardio-metabolic risk factors and cardiovascular diseases, focusing on type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia based mainly on Dutch and British data.

BackgroundEffects of short‐term interventions on large‐artery stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV) have mainly been explained by concomitant changes in blood pressure (BP). However, lower body negative pressure, which increases sympathetic activity and has other hemodynamic effects, has a specific effect on PWV in healthy volunteers.Methods and ResultsWe examined effects of lower‐limb venous occlusion (LVO), a similar intervention to lower‐body negative pressure that reduces BP but increases sympathetic activity and device‐guided breathing (DGB), which reduces both BP and sympathetic activity, on PWV in patients with essential hypertension (n=70 after LVO, n=45 after DGB and LVO in random order). The short‐acting calcium channel antagonist nifedipine was used as a control for changes in BP. LVO produced a small but significant reduction in mean arterial pressure of 1.8 (95% CI 0.3–3.4) mm Hg. Despite this, aortic and carotid‐femoral PWV increased during LVO by 0.8 (0.2–1.4) m/s and 0.7 (0.3–1.05) m/s, respectively. DGB reduced PWV by 1.2 (0.9–1.4) m/s, to a greater extent than did nifedipine 10 mg (reduction of 0.7 [0.1–1.3] m/s, P<0.05 compared with reduction during DGB). This occurred despite a greater decrease in BP with nifedipine compared with DGB.ConclusionsArterial stiffness can be modulated independently of BP over the short term. The mechanism could involve alterations in sympathetic activity or other as yet uncharacterized effects of LVO and DGB.

BackgroundEthnicity, along with a variety of genetic and environmental factors, is thought to influence the efficacy of antihypertensive therapies. Current UK guidelines use a “black versus white” approach; in doing so, they ignore the United Kingdom's largest ethnic minority: Asians from South Asia.Study designThe primary purpose of the AIM-HY INFORM trial is to identify potential differences in response to antihypertensive drugs used as mono- or dual therapy on the basis of self-defined ethnicity. A multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized study with 2 parallel, independent trial arms (mono- and dual therapy), AIM-HY INFORM plans to enroll a total of 1,320 patients from across the United Kingdom. Those receiving monotherapy (n = 660) will enter a 3-treatment (amlodipine 10 mg od; lisinopril 20 mg od; chlorthalidone 25 mg od), 3-period crossover, lasting 24 weeks, whereas those receiving dual therapy (n = 660) will enter a 4-treatment (amlodipine 5 mg od and lisinopril 20 mg od; amlodipine 5 mg od and chlorthalidone 25 mg od; lisinopril 20 mg od and chlorthalidone 25 mg od; amiloride 10 mg od and chlorthalidone 25 mg od), 4-period crossover, lasting 32 weeks. Equal numbers of 3 ethnic groups (white, black/black British, and Asian/Asian British) will ultimately be recruited to each of the trial arms (ie, 220 participants per ethnic group per arm). Seated, automated, unattended, office, systolic blood pressure measured 8 weeks after each treatment period begins will serve as the primary outcome measure.ConclusionAIM-HY INFORM is a prospective, open-label, randomized trial which aims to evaluate first- and second-line antihypertensive therapies for multiethnic populations.