Oncogene-induced replicative stress activates an Atr- and Chk1-dependent response, which has been proposed to be widespread in tumors. We explored whether the presence of replicative stress could be exploited for the selective elimination of cancer cells. To this end, we evaluated the impact of targeting the replicative stress-response on cancer development. In mice (Mus musculus), the reduced levels of Atr found on a mouse model of the Atr-Seckel syndrome completely prevented the development of Myc-induced lymphomas or pancreatic tumors, both of which showed abundant levels of replicative stress. Moreover, Chk1 inhibitors were highly effective in killing Myc-driven lymphomas. By contrast, pancreatic adenocarcinomas initiated by K-Ras(G12V) showed no detectable evidence of replicative stress and were nonresponsive to this therapy. Besides its impact on cancer, Myc overexpression aggravated the phenotypes of Atr-Seckel mice, revealing that oncogenes can modulate the severity of replicative stress-associated diseases.

Primary liver cancer represents a major health problem. It comprises hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), which differ markedly with regards to their morphology, metastatic potential and responses to therapy. However, the regulatory molecules and tissue context that commit transformed hepatic cells towards HCC or ICC are largely unknown. Here we show that the hepatic microenvironment epigenetically shapes lineage commitment in mosaic mouse models of liver tumorigenesis. Whereas a necroptosis-associated hepatic cytokine microenvironment determines ICC outgrowth from oncogenically transformed hepatocytes, hepatocytes containing identical oncogenic drivers give rise to HCC if they are surrounded by apoptotic hepatocytes. Epigenome and transcriptome profiling of mouse HCC and ICC singled out Tbx3 and Prdm5 as major microenvironment-dependent and epigenetically regulated lineage-commitment factors, a function that is conserved in humans. Together, our results provide insight into lineage commitment in liver tumorigenesis, and explain molecularly why common liver-damaging risk factors can lead to either HCC or ICC.

SummaryOncogene-induced senescence is a potent tumor-suppressive response. Paradoxically, senescence also induces an inflammatory secretome that promotes carcinogenesis and age-related pathologies. Consequently, the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) is a potential therapeutic target. Here, we describe an RNAi screen for SASP regulators. We identified 50 druggable targets whose knockdown suppresses the inflammatory secretome and differentially affects other SASP components. Among the screen candidates was PTBP1. PTBP1 regulates the alternative splicing of genes involved in intracellular trafficking, such as EXOC7, to control the SASP. Inhibition of PTBP1 prevents the pro-tumorigenic effects of the SASP and impairs immune surveillance without increasing the risk of tumorigenesis. In conclusion, our study identifies SASP inhibition as a powerful and safe therapy against inflammation-driven cancer.

No abstract

Although it is well established that TNFα contributes to hepatitis, liver failure and associated hepatocarcinogenesis via the regulation of inflammation, its pro-apoptotic role in the liver has remained enigmatic. On its own, TNFα is unable to trigger apoptosis. However, when combined with the transcriptional inhibitor GaLN, it can cause hepatocyte apoptosis and liver failure in mice. Moreover, along with others, we have shown that TNFα is capable of sensitizing cells to FasL- or drug-induced cell death via c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation and phosphorylation/activation of the BH3-only protein Bim. In this context, TNFα could exacerbate hepatocyte cell death during simultaneous inflammatory and T-cell-mediated immune responses in the liver. Here we show that TNFα sensitizes primary hepatocytes, established hepatocyte cell lines and mouse embryo fibroblasts to FasL-induced apoptosis by the transcriptional induction and higher surface expression of Fas via the NFκB pathway. Genetic deletion, diminished expression or dominant-negative inhibition of the NFκB subunit p65 resulted in lower Fas expression and inhibited TNFα-induced Fas upregulation and sensitization to FasL-induced cell death. By hydrodynamic injection of p65 shRNA into the tail vein of mice, we confirm that Fas upregulation by TNFα is also NFκB-mediated in the liver. In conclusion, TNFα sensitization of FasL-induced apoptosis in the liver proceeds via two parallel signaling pathways, activation of JNK and Bim phosphorylation and NFκB-mediated Fas upregulation.

Three structures of LXRα (5HJS, 3IPS and 3LOE) and two structures of LXRß (1PQ6 and 1PQ9) were selected based on the chemical similarity of their co-crystallized ligands with sorafenib and were retrieved from the PDB server. Selected proteins were prepared by adding hydrogens, adjusting protonation states of amino-acids and fixing missing side-chain atoms

The c-myc proto-oncogene is activated by translocation in Burkitt's lymphoma and substitutions in codon 58 stabilize the Myc protein or augment its oncogenic potential. In wild-type Myc, phosphorylation of Ser 62 and Thr 58 provides a landing pad for the peptidyl prolyl-isomerase Pin1, which in turn promotes Ser 62 dephosphorylation and Myc degradation. However, the role of Pin1 in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis remains unknown. We show here that genetic ablation of Pin1 reduces lymphomagenesis in Eμ-myc transgenic mice. In both Pin1-deficient B-cells and MEFs, the proliferative response to oncogenic Myc was selectively impaired, with no alterations in Myc-induced apoptosis or mitogen-induced cell cycle entry. This proliferative defect wasn't attributable to alterations in either Ser 62 phosphorylation or Myc-regulated transcription, but instead relied on the activity of the ARF-p53 pathway. Pin1 silencing in lymphomas retarded disease progression in mice, making Pin1 an attractive therapeutic target in Myc-driven tumors.

Prognosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a type of primary liver cancer comprising areas with HCC and ICC histopathology, is dismal, and it is unclear if such tumors develop clonally and how they should be treated. In this issue of Cancer Cell, Xue et al. ( 2019) provide answers to these questions.The most frequent types of primary liver cancer (PLC) are hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), accounting for 80% and 15% of all cases, respectively (Marquardt et al., 2015). HCC and ICC show rapidly increasing incidence, especially in western countries, and are distinct regarding their morphology, metastatic capacity, and response to cancer therapies (Llovet et al., 2016;Rizvi and Gores, 2013). While HCCs grow in a solid, trabecular, and sometimes pseudoglandular pattern with a high density of tumor cells and almost no desmoplastic tumor stroma, ICCs are composed of ductular, papillary, or solid tumor structures embedded in a dense tumor stroma (Marquardt et al., 2015). Although HCC is also invasive, the rate of metastatic tumors is higher in ICC (Wu et al., 2017). Interestingly, HCCs respond to therapy with multikinase inhibitors, while ICCs are refractory to such drugs. Conversely, ICCs show therapeutic responses toward classical cytotoxic therapy, while HCC represents a chemoresistant tumor (Llovet et al., 2016;Rizvi and Gores, 2013).Combined hepatocellular and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC) is a rare type of PLC showing both hepatocellular and biliary epithelial differentiation and has an incidence rate ranging between 0.4% and 14.2% (Connell et al., 2016;Maximin et al., 2014). cHCC-ICC is reported to have more aggressive behavior and poorer prognosis in comparison with HCC and ICC and currently has no specialized treatment available. According to Allen and Lisa's criteria, cHCC-ICCs are classified into three subtypes: separate, showing physically separated, histologically different lesions; combined, characterized by clearly