This single institution, high-volume experience indicates that pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely for a variety of malignant and benign disorders of the pancreas and periampullary region. Overall survival is determined largely by the pathology within the resection specimen.

No abstract

Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy significantly improves survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas. Based on these survival data, standard adjuvant chemoradiation therapy appears to be indicated for patients treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas. Intensive therapy conferred no survival advantage over standard therapy in this analysis.

Allogeneic GM-CSF-secreting tumor vaccines are safe in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This vaccine approach seems to induce dose-dependent systemic antitumor immunity as measured by increased postvaccination DTH responses against autologous tumors. Further clinical evaluation of this approach in patients with pancreatic cancer is warranted.

Overall response rates among phase 1 oncology trials are higher than previously reported, although they have not changed for classic phase 1 trials, and toxicity-related death rates have remained stable. Rates of response and toxicity vary, however, among the various types of phase 1 oncology trials.

Busulfan is an alkylating agent that is widely used in preparative regimens for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We developed a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for the determination of plasma busulfan concentrations in 30 patients who received oral doses of 1 mg/kg. Concentrations were fit by a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption. The pattern of absorption and elimination varied widely between patients, with peak concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 10.4 mumol/l (mean, 4.25 +/- 2.49). The elimination half-life ranged from 58 to 433 min (harmonic mean, 140 min). The AUC contributed by a single oral dose ranged from 606 to 5,144 mumol-min/l (mean, 2,012 +/- 1,223). Patients were evaluated for the development of veno-occlusive disease (VOD), a treatment complication that occurs in 20% of patients undergoing BMT and causes 10% of transplantation-related deaths. All six patients who developed VOD had an AUC greater than the mean, and five of them had an AUC that was greater than 1 SD above the mean. The occurrence of VOD was highly correlated with an increased AUC (greater than 1 SD above the mean) (X2 = 18; P less than 0.0001). Using multivariate logistic regression, no other statistically significant pharmacokinetic predictor of VOD was found. The tenfold variability in the busulfan AUC and the statistical association of increased AUC with the development of VOD suggest a possible role for therapeutic monitoring in this setting.

The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.

Neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity, and 1.5 mg/m2 is the recommended starting dose of topotecan for both minimally and heavily pretreated patients in future phase II trials, with escalation to 2.0 mg/m2 if treatment is well tolerated. Non-small-cell lung and platinum-refractory ovarian carcinomas should be among those evaluated in phase II trials of topotecan.