The rhodamine-based probe R19-S has been shown to react with hypochlorous acid (HOCl) to yield fluorescent R19, but not with some other oxidants including hydrogen peroxide. Here, we further examined the specificity of R19-S and used it for real-time monitoring of HOCl production in neutrophil phagosomes. We show that it also reacts rapidly with hypobromous acid, bromamines, and hypoiodous acid, indicating that R19-S responds to these reactive halogen species as well as HOCl. Hypothiocyanous acid and taurine chloramine were unreactive, however, and ammonia chloramine and dichloramine reacted only very slowly. MS analyses revealed additional products from the reaction of HOCl with R19-S, including a chlorinated species as a minor product. Of note, phagocytosis of opsonized zymosan or by neutrophils was accompanied by an increase in R19 fluorescence. This increase depended on NADPH oxidase and myeloperoxidase activities, and detection of chlorinated R19-S confirmed its specificity for HOCl. Using live-cell imaging to track individual phagosomes in single neutrophils, we observed considerable heterogeneity among the phagosomes in the time from ingestion of a zymosan particle to when fluorescence was first detected, ranging from 1 to>30 min. However, once initiated, the subsequent fluorescence increase was uniform, reaching a similar maximum in ∼10 min. Our results confirm the utility of R19-S for detecting HOCl in real-time and provide definitive evidence that isolated neutrophils produce HOCl in phagosomes. The intriguing variability in the onset of HOCl production among phagosomes identified here could influence the way they kill ingested bacteria.

Targeting immune evasion tactics of pathogenic bacteria may hold the key to treating recalcitrant bacterial infections. Staphylococcus aureus produces bacillithiol (BSH), its major low‐molecular‐weight thiol, which is thought to protect this opportunistic human pathogen against the bombardment of oxidants inside neutrophil phagosomes. Here, we show that BSH was oxidized when human neutrophils phagocytosed S. aureus, but provided limited protection to the bacteria. We used mass spectrometry to measure the oxidation of BSH upon exposure of S. aureus USA300 to either a bolus of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) or a flux generated by the neutrophil enzyme myeloperoxidase. Oxidation of BSH and loss of bacterial viability were strongly correlated (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). BSH was fully oxidized after exposure of S. aureus to lethal doses of HOCl. However, there was no relationship between the initial BSH levels and the dose of HOCl required for bacterial killing. In contrast to the HOCl systems, only 50% of total BSH was oxidized when neutrophils killed the majority of phagocytosed bacteria. Oxidation of BSH was decreased upon inhibition of myeloperoxidase, implicating HOCl in phagosomal BSH oxidation. A BSH‐deficient S. aureus USA300 mutant was slightly more susceptible to treatment with either HOCl or ammonia chloramine, or to killing within neutrophil phagosomes. Collectively, our data show that myeloperoxidase‐derived oxidants react with S. aureus inside neutrophil phagosomes, leading to partial BSH oxidation, and contribute to bacterial killing. However, BSH offers only limited protection against the neutrophil's multifaceted killing mechanisms.

No abstract

No abstract

Neutrophils generate hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and related reactive chlorine species as part of their defence against invading microorganisms. In isolation, bacteria respond to reactive chlorine species by upregulating responses that provide defence against oxidative challenge. Key questions are whether these responses are induced when bacteria are phagocytosed by neutrophils, and whether this provides them with a survival advantage. We investigated RclR, a transcriptional activator of the rclABC operon in Escherichia coli that has been shown to be specifically activated by reactive chlorine species. We first measured induction by individual reactive chlorine species, and showed that HOCl itself activates the response, as do chloramines (products of HOCl reacting with amines) provided they are cell permeable. Strong RclR activation was seen in E. coli following phagocytosis by neutrophils, beginning within 5 min and persisting for 40 min. RclR activation was suppressed by inhibitors of NOX2 and myeloperoxidase, providing strong evidence that it was due to HOCl production in the phagosome. RclR activation demonstrates that HOCl, or a derived chloramine, enters phagocytosed bacteria in sufficient amount to induce this response. Although RclR was induced in wild-type bacteria following phagocytosis, we detected no greater sensitivity to neutrophil killing of mutants lacking genes in the rclABC operon.

Edited by F. Peter GuengerichUrate is often viewed as an antioxidant. Here, we present an alternative perspective by showing that, when oxidized, urate propagates oxidative stress. Oxidation converts urate to the urate radical and the electrophilic products dehydrourate, 5-hydroxyisourate, and urate hydroperoxide, which eventually break down to allantoin. We investigated whether urate-derived electrophiles are intercepted by nucleophilic amino acid residues to form stable adducts on proteins. When urate was oxidized in the presence of various peptides and proteins, two adducts derived from urate (M r 167 Da) were detected and had mass additions of 140 and 166 Da, occurring mainly on lysine residues and N-terminal amines. The adduct with a 140-Da mass addition was detected more frequently and was stable. Dehydrourate (M r 166 Da) also formed transient adducts with cysteine residues. Uratederived adducts were detected on human serum albumin in plasma of healthy donors. Basal adduct levels increased when neutrophils were added to plasma and stimulated, and relied on the NADPH oxidase, myeloperoxidase, hydrogen peroxide, and superoxide. Adducts of oxidized urate on serum albumin were elevated in plasma and synovial fluid from individuals with gout and rheumatoid arthritis. We propose that rather than acting as an antioxidant, urate's conversion to electrophiles contributes to oxidative stress. The addition of urate-derived electrophiles to nucleophilic amino acid residues, a process we call oxidative uratylation, will leave a footprint on proteins that could alter their function when critical sites are modified. 2 The abbreviations used are: MPO, myeloperoxidase; EPI, enhanced product ion; DPI, diphenyliodonium; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase; MIF, macrophage migration inhbitory factor; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TX1, 3-isobutyl-2-thioxo-7H-purin-6-one; XO, xanthine oxidase; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; CAT, catalase; FA, formic acid; ANOVA, analysis of variance; CytB, cytochalasin B. Formation of urate-derived adducts on albumin by isolated neutrophilsPeripheral blood from three healthy male donors (age 45-60 years) was obtained with informed consent as approved by the Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee of New Zealand. The studies abide by the Declaration of Helsinki principles. Neutrophils were isolated from the heparinized blood by dextran sedimentation followed by Ficoll-Paque centrifugation Urate-derived adducts on proteins

Three decades ago, our free radical research group in Ōtautahi Christchurch asked two rather straightforward questions: "What's so super about superoxide?", and "How do neutrophils use superoxide to kill bacteria?" 1-3 Neither question was particularly novel but they were at the heart of understanding the importance of the superoxide radical anion (O −⋅ 2 ) in oxidative stress and host defense. Naively, we thought that an answer to the first question would also satisfy the second question. We hoped that by probing how neutrophils use superoxide to kill ingested bacteria, we would reveal the toxic nature of superoxide. With these answers in hand, we could explain why the enzyme superoxide dismutase is needed to protect cells from oxidative stress. Our naiveté stretched to thinking that these questions would yield quick answers. But, in reality, the central question remains to this day: How does superoxide generation and removal fit into normal physiology? 4

No abstract