The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of handheld fundus cameras in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME), and macular degeneration. Participants in the study, conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Hospital in Northern Thailand between September 2018 and May 2019, underwent an ophthalmologist examination as well as mydriatic fundus photography with three handheld fundus cameras (iNview, Peek Retina, Pictor Plus). Photographs were graded and adjudicated by masked ophthalmologists. Outcome measures included the sensitivity and specificity of each fundus camera for detecting DR, DME, and macular degeneration, relative to ophthalmologist examination. Fundus photographs of 355 eyes from 185 participants were captured with each of the three retinal cameras. Of the 355 eyes, 102 had DR, 71 had DME, and 89 had macular degeneration on ophthalmologist examination. The Pictor Plus was the most sensitive camera for each of the diseases (73–77%) and also achieved relatively high specificity (77–91%). The Peek Retina was the most specific (96–99%), although in part due to its low sensitivity (6–18%). The iNview had slightly lower estimates of sensitivity (55–72%) and specificity (86–90%) compared to the Pictor Plus. These findings demonstrated that the handheld cameras achieved high specificity but variable sensitivities in detecting DR, DME, and macular degeneration. The Pictor Plus, iNview, and Peek Retina would have distinct advantages and disadvantages when applied for utilization in tele-ophthalmology retinal screening programs.
Purpose To report the clinical course and treatment strategies employed in management of a case of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis progressing to endophthalmitis. The drug-resistant strain was later traced to use of contaminated EzriCare Artificial Tears in a multi-state cluster outbreak. Observations A 57-year-old male patient with a history of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was referred for a culture-positive Pseudomonas corneal ulcer in the right eye that had been treated with several weeks of topical moxifloxacin, fortified vancomycin and tobramycin, and intravitreal injections for endophthalmitis. His cornea was cultured off of antibiotics and grew only rare Propionibacterium acnes. Topical antibiotics and steroids were reduced, but his condition rapidly deteriorated with leading to corneal melt, perforation, and endophthalmitis. Repeat corneal cultures and sensitivity analyses revealed growth of a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that was resistant to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems, and only intermediate susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam. The patient underwent a therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and was subsequently initiated on an intensive regimen of topical chlorhexidine and polymyxin-B/trimethoprim. He also underwent a pars plana vitrectomy with anterior chamber washout, followed by serial injections of intravitreal piperacillin-tazobactam at a dose of 225 mg/0.1 mL. After 8 weeks of intensive treatment, there was gradual with healing of his ocular surface, regression of his hypopyon and posterior inflammation, and no signs of recurrent infection. A public health investigation ultimately revealed that his infection was one of several cases involved in a multistate cluster outbreak of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas ocular infections that were traced to the use of contaminated EzriCare Artificial Tears. Conclusions and Importance Multidrug-resistant keratitis and endophthalmitis caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas keratitis requires consideration of nonconventional antimicrobial agents and experimental therapeutic alternatives. Topical chlorhexidine and intravitreal piperacillin-tazobactam are currently nonconventional therapies in the context of bacterial keratitis and endophthalmitis, but were safe and effective in the management of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ocular infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.