Severe or therapy-resistant asthma is increasingly recognised as a major unmet need. A Task Force, supported by the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society, reviewed the definition and provided recommendations and guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of severe asthma in children and adults.A literature review was performed, followed by discussion by an expert committee according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach for development of specific clinical recommendations.When the diagnosis of asthma is confirmed and comorbidities addressed, severe asthma is defined as asthma that requires treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller and/or systemic corticosteroids to prevent it from becoming “uncontrolled” or that remains “uncontrolled” despite this therapy. Severe asthma is a heterogeneous condition consisting of phenotypes such as eosinophilic asthma. Specific recommendations on the use of sputum eosinophil count and exhaled nitric oxide to guide therapy, as well as treatment with anti-IgE antibody, methotrexate, macrolide antibiotics, antifungal agents and bronchial thermoplasty are provided.Coordinated research efforts for improved phenotyping will provide safe and effective biomarker-driven approaches to severe asthma therapy.

This document provides clinical recommendations for the management of severe asthma. Comprehensive evidence syntheses, including meta-analyses, were performed to summarise all available evidence relevant to the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Task Force's questions. The evidence was appraised using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and the results were summarised in evidence profiles. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by a multidisciplinary Task Force of asthma experts, who made specific recommendations on six specific questions. After considering the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, quality of evidence, feasibility, and acceptability of various interventions, the Task Force made the following recommendations: 1) suggest using anti-interleukin (IL)-5 and anti-IL-5 receptor α for severe uncontrolled adult eosinophilic asthma phenotypes; 2) suggest using a blood eosinophil cut-point ≥150 μL−1 to guide anti-IL-5 initiation in adult patients with severe asthma; 3) suggest considering specific eosinophil (≥260 μL−1) and exhaled nitric oxide fraction (≥19.5 ppb) cut-offs to identify adolescents or adults with the greatest likelihood of response to anti-IgE therapy; 4) suggest using inhaled tiotropium for adolescents and adults with severe uncontrolled asthma despite Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step 4–5 or National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) step 5 therapies; 5) suggest a trial of chronic macrolide therapy to reduce asthma exacerbations in persistently symptomatic or uncontrolled patients on GINA step 5 or NAEPP step 5 therapies, irrespective of asthma phenotype; and 6) suggest using anti-IL-4/13 for adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and for those with severe corticosteroid-dependent asthma regardless of blood eosinophil levels. These recommendations should be reconsidered as new evidence becomes available.

In the treatment of uncontrolled asthma, budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduces the incidence of severe asthma exacerbations and hospitalisation/ER treatment with similar daily symptom control compared with sustained high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone plus SABA. This benefit is achieved with substantially less ICS exposure.

chronic cough are presented in algorithmic form (Fig 1-3). Guidelines with algorithms for evaluating chronic cough in pediatric patients < 15 years of age are presented in the section entitled "Guidelines for Evaluating Chronic Cough in Pediatrics" 2,4 [Fig 4, 5]. For a full discussion on how to use the algorithms, please refer to these sections. Summary and Recommendations Recommendations for each section of these guidelines are listed under their respective section titles. For an in-depth discussion or clarification of each recommendation, readers are encouraged to read the specific section in question in its entirety. Methodology and Grading of the Evidence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cough 5 • The recommendations were graded, by consensus by the panel, using the American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Grading System, which is based on the following two components: quality of evidence; and the net benefit of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. • The quality of evidence is rated according to the study design and strength of other methodologies used in the included studies.

Inhaled allergens, acting through IgE-dependent mechanisms, are important triggers of asthma symptoms and inducers of airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. The effect of anti-IgE recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody-E25 (rhuMAb-E25) on the provocation concentration of allergen causing a 15% fall in FEV1 (allergen PC15) during the allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR) was assessed in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Ten of 11 allergic asthmatic subjects randomized to receive intravenous rhuMAb-E25, 2 mg/kg on study day 0 and 1 mg/kg on Days 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70 completed the study; nine received intravenous placebo. The allergen PC15 was measured on Days -1, 27, 55, and 77 and methacholine PC20 on Days -2, 42, and 76. rhuMAb-25 was well tolerated and only one patient (active group) was withdrawn because of a generalized urticarial rash after the first dose. Compared with baseline values (Day -1), the median allergen PC15 on Days 27, 55, and 77 were increased by 2.3, 2.2, and 2.7 doubling doses (delta log PC15/0.3) respectively with rhuMAb-E25 and -0.3, +0.1, and -0.8 doubling doses with placebo (p < or = 0.002). Methacholine PC20 improved slightly after rhuMAb-E25, this change becoming statistically significant on Day 76 (p < 0.05); no change was observed in the placebo group. Mean serum-free IgE fell by 89% after rhuMAb-E25 while there was no significant change after placebo. The inhibitory effects of rhuMAb-E25 on allergen-induced EAR suggest that it may be an effective, novel antiallergic treatment for asthma.