No abstract

Despite widespread use of the automatic blood pressure (BP) measuring device OMRON M4, there is little formal validation on its accuracy. A study was conducted to assess the accuracy of the OMRON M4 compared with the true indirect BP measured by mercury sphygmomanometer (MS). A rapid method for the evaluation of automatic blood pressure measurement devices (READ) was applied for this study. The READ is based on numerous BP measurements at rest and during a standardised postural challenge in a small number of subjects who exhibit a wide range of BPs. Blood pressure measurements were done in supine position for 10 min followed by head-up tilt for 30 min and again supine for 10 min. The automatic device (AU) and the MS were connected to one arm-cuff by means of a T connector. A stethoscope with dual sets of ear-pieces was used for duplicate MS measurements (MS1 and MS2). The MS1, MS2 and AU measurements were taken simultaneously in a blinded manner. Three units of the automatic instrument were evaluated. An average of 111 measurements per unit were performed, every BP category being present in у15 MS measurements. The differences between MS1 and MS2 measurements (⌬BP: MS1-MS2)

The normal response to postural challenge is characterised by maintenance of relatively stable blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) after 30 sec to 30 min of headup tilt. The objective of the present study was to determine the degree of instability of cardiovascular responses to postural challenge in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. In the initial phase of the study, two groups of age and sex-matched subjects were assessed: essential hypertension (n ‫؍‬ 20) and healthy (n ‫؍‬ 37). The BP and HR were recorded at 5-min intervals during the course of the 10-min supine-30-min head-up tilt test (HUTT). We categorised 'BP-change' as the difference between individual BP measurements during HUTT and the last recumbent BP value, divided by latter value. The average and standard deviation (SD) of the recorded BP changes were calculated, and BP changes were plotted along a time curve. A computerised image analyser then calculated the outline ratio (OR) and fractal dimension (FD) values for each of the curves. An identical process evaluated measurements for HR-changes. BP-and HR-changes were then converted into absolute numbers, and the average, SD, OR, and FD were calculated. A multivariate analysis was conducted, evaluating independent predictors of hypertension. Finally, an equation for the calculation of 'haemodynamic instability score' (HIS) was deduced and a cut-off between HIS of hypertensive and normo-