The EUREF Permanent Network Densification is a collaborative effort of 26 European GNSS analysis centers providing series of daily or weekly station position estimates of dense national and regional GNSS networks, in order to combine them into one homogenized set of station positions and velocities. During the combination, the station meta-data, including station names, DOMES numbers, and position offset definitions were carefully homogenized, position outliers were efficiently eliminated, and the results were cross-checked for any remaining inconsistencies. The results cover the period from March 1999 to January 2017 (GPS week 1000-1933) and include 31 networks with positions and velocities for 3192 stations, well covering Europe. The positions and velocities are expressed in ITRF2014 and ETRF2014 reference frames based on the Minimum Constraint approach using a selected set of ITRF2014 reference stations. The position alignment with the ITRF2014 is at the level of 1.5, 1.2, and 3.2 mm RMS for the East, North, Up components, respectively, while the velocity RMS values are 0.17, 0.14, and 0.38 mm/year for the East, North, and Up components, respectively. The high quality of the combined solution is also reflected by the 1.1, 1.1, and 3.5 mm weighted RMS values for the East, North, and Up components, respectively.

The growing need for a consistent and densified GNSS position and velocity solution for the Nordic and Baltic countries resulted in development of the joint GNSS Analysis Centre of the Nordic Geodetic Commission (NKG) in 2012. We first developed the methods of the operational processing and combination of solutions and then reprocessed the full data history between 1997 and 2017. In this study, we present an ITRF2014 densification for the area including 252 stations having more than 3 years of data. We combined all 20 years of daily solutions with full covariance matrices instead of station-wise analysis and analyzed the noise characteristics of the residual time series. We concluded that the flicker plus white noise uncertainty estimates were more robust than the general power-law estimates. Additionally, we found significant horizontal velocity differences at the co-located stations, pointing out biases not included in the formal uncertainties. The solution is more accurate and denser than any previous estimate, and it will be of great benefit for maintaining the reference frames in the Nordic and Baltic countries, as well as for the geodynamic studies in the area.

The Nordic Geodetic Commission (NKG) has launched a joint NKG GNSS Analysis Centre that aims to routinely produce high qualityGNSS solutions for the common needs of the NKG and the Nordic and Baltic countries. A consistent and densified velocity field is needed for the constraining of the gla-cial isostatic adjustment (GIA) modelling that is a key component of maintaining the national reference frame realisations in the area. We described the methods of the NKG GNSS Analysis Centre including the defined processing setup for the local analysis centres (LAC) and for the combination centres.We analysed the results of the first 2.5 years (2014.5-2016). The results showed that different subnets were consistent with the combined solution within 1-2 mm level. We observed the so called network effect affecting our reference frame alignment. However, the accuracy of the reference frame alignment was on a few millimetre level in the area of the main interest (Nordic and Baltic Countries). TheNKGGNSS AC was declared fully operational in April 2017.

In Fennoscandia, the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) causes intraplate deformations that affect the national static reference frames. The GNSS-determined velocities are important data for constraining the GIA models, which are necessary for maintaining the national reference frames. The Nordic Geodetic Commission (NKG) has published a dense and consistent GNSS station velocity solution in 2019, and we present now an update of the solution covering additional 3.5 years of data. Undetected positional offsets are the main factor decreasing the accuracy of the velocity estimates. We developed a method for the semi-automatic offset detection to improve the quality of our solution. The results show that we could correctly detect 74% of the manually determined offsets, and the undetected offsets would have caused a median 0.1 mm/y bias in trend. The method pointed out some otherwise unnoticed offsets and will decrease the need for manual analysis in the future. The updated velocity solution especially improves the velocity estimates of the newly established stations and the quality of the velocity estimates in Baltic countries. The formal uncertainties estimated using the power-law plus white noise model were at a median of 0.06 and 0.15 mm/y for horizontal and vertical velocities, respectively. However, we concluded that the systematic velocity uncertainties due to the reference frame alignment were approximately at the same level.

No abstract

Abstract:The NKG 2008 GPS campaign was carried out in September 28 -October 4, 2008. The purpose was to establish a common reference frame in the NordicBaltic-Arctic region, and to improve and update the transformations from the latest global ITRF reference frame to the national ETRS89 realizations of the Nordic/Baltic countries. Postglacial rebound in the Fennoscandian area causes intraplate deformations up to about 10 mm/yr to the Eurasian tectonic plate which need to be taken into account in order to reach centimetre level accuracies in the transformations. We discuss some possible alternatives and present the most applicable transformation strategy. The selected transformation utilizes the de facto transformation recommended by the EUREF but includes additional intraplate corrections and a new common Nordic-Baltic reference frame to serve the requirements of the Nordic/Baltic countries. To correct for the intraplate deformations in the Nordic-Baltic area we have used the common Nordic deformation model NKG RF03vel. The new common reference frame, NKG ETRF00, was aligned to ETRF2000 at epoch 2000.0 in order to be close to the national ETRS89 realizations and to coincide with the land uplift epoch of the national height systems. We present here the realization of the NKG ETRF00 and transformation formulae together with the parameters to transform from global ITRF coordinates to Nordic/Baltic realizations of the ETRS89.

No abstract

The present ETRS 89 realisations in Latvia and Lithuania are based on the EUREF‐BAL'92 campaign, which has an estimated accuracy of the same level as the original EUREF 89 campaign (class C). Latvia and Lithuania wish to replace their EUREF‐BAL'92 realisation with an ETRS 89 realisation based on the NKG 2003 GPS campaign. The NKG 2003 GPS campaign was carried out in GPS-week 1238 (Sept 28th to Oct 4th 2003) under the framework of the Nordic Geodetic Commission (NKG). The campaign included mainly permanent stations in the Nordic and Baltic area as well as Island, Greenland and Svalbard. In Latvia, Lithuania and Denmark also field sites defining ETRS 89 were included. New ETRS 89 coordinates based on the NKG 2003 campaign have been calculated. The campaign resulted in a set of coordinates in ITRF 2000 epoch 2003.75. All stations in Latvia and Lithuania as well as a sub-set of stations in neighbouring countries were converted to ETRS 89 using the standard procedure described by Boucher and Altamimi. No intraplate deformations have been taken into account, thus the epoch of the ETRS 89 coordinates is 2003.75. Estimated accuracy: 0,5–1 cm (95%) for the horizontal co-ordinates and 1–2 cm (95%) for the vertical at the epoch of the observation. The computed ETRS 89 coordinates presented in this paper are to be considered as improvement and extension of ETRS 89 in Latvia and Lithuania based on the NKG 2003 GPS campaign. During symposia in Riga, 14–17 June 2006, the IAG Reference Frame Sub-commission for Europe (EUREF) recognising, that in Sept-Oct 2003 the EUREF-NKG-2003 campaign in Scandinavia and the Baltic countries was observed, including points in Latvia and Lithuania, and that the results of it were submitted to the EUREF Technical Working Group, where they were accepted as Class B standard (about 1 cm at the epoch of observation), endorses the subset of points submitted to the EUREF Technical Working Group as extension to the current realisation of ETRS89 (Resolution No 1).