Background: The hypochromic red cell is a direct indicator of functional iron deficiency (ID) in contrast to the majority of biochemical markers, which measure functional ID indirectly via iron-deficient erythropoiesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which these biochemical markers can distinguish ID from anemia of chronic disease (ACD) as well as from the combined state of functional ID/ACD, using red cell hemoglobinization as the gold standard. Methods: We studied 442 patients with various disease-specific anemias and 154 nonanemic patients. As indicators of red cell hemoglobinization, we measured the reticulocyte hemoglobin content (CHr) and the proportion of hypochromic red cells (HYPO), using an Advia 120 hematology analyzer. Ferritin, transferrin, transferrin saturation, and the concentration of the soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) were determined by ELISA and immunoturbidimetric assay. The sTfR/log ferritin ratio (sTfR-F index) was used as an additional marker for biochemical identification of iron-deficient erythropoiesis. Results: In a control group (n = 71), the 2.5 percentile values were 28 pg for CHr and 5% for HYPO. These values were used to indicate unimpaired red cell hemoglobinization and absence of functional ID. In patients with deficient red cell hemoglobinization but no acute-phase response (APR), iron-deficient erythropoiesis was indicated by serum ferritin and sTfR-F index values ≤20.8 μg/L and >1.5, respectively. Corresponding values in patients with APR were ≤61.7 μg/L and >0.8, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios for the biochemical markers and the sTfR-F index for identifying iron-restricted erythropoiesis in patients with and without APR were 2.6–6.9 and 4.3–16.5, respectively. Conclusion: In APR patients, biochemical markers demonstrate weaknesses in the diagnosis of functional ID as defined by hematologic indices. Use of diagnostic plots to illustrate the relationship between the sTfR-F index and CHr allows the progression of ID to be identified, regardless of whether an APR is present.

The aims of this study were to diagnose iron-restricted erythropoiesis (functional iron deficiency) in patients with classic iron deficiency (ID), anemia of chronic disease (ACD) and the combined state of ID/ACD with the use of two hematological methods for the measurement of reticulocyte hemoglobinization. In comparison, the biochemical markers of iron status were determined. We studied 474 anemic patients admitted to hospital with a broad spectrum of diseases. We measured indicators of reticulocyte hemoglobinization. CHr was determined on an Advia 120 hematology analyzer. A Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer was used to determine RET-Y, the forward scatter of fluorescence-labeled reticulocytes, which can also be expressed as the reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (RET-H(e)), as well as RBC-Y, the forward scatter of fluorescence-labeled erythrocytes, which can be expressed as the erythrocyte hemoglobin equivalent. Ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and the sTfR/log ferritin ratio (sTfR-F index) were used as biochemical markers. The comparison of RET-Y with CHr demonstrated an excellent curvilinear relationship between the two parameters. The normal reference range for Ret-Y was 1630-1860 arbitrary units (AU); mathematical transformation to RET-H(e) gave a range of 28.2-35.7 pg. Correlations of biochemical iron markers with RET-H(e) were as weak as with CHr in patients with ACD and acute phase response. In a diagnostic plot to identify iron status, RET-H(e) could replace CHr without any loss of sensitivity or specificity. Patient mismatch analysis between RET-H(e) and CHr in the diagnostic plot demonstrated agreement for 449 of 474 patients (94.4%). Patient specific anemia mismatches were 2.9-6.2%. According to our results, the indicators of reticulocyte hemoglobinization, RET-H(e) and CHr, measure the same phenomenon. RET-H(e) is as valuable as CHr for the diagnosis of iron-restricted erythropoiesis. The combination of RET-H(e) and the sTfR-F index in a diagnostic plot offers an attractive tool for the evaluation of iron status and identification of the progression of ID.

Classic iron deficiency (ID) does not represent a challenge for the laboratory and physicians. The anemia that accompanies infection, inflammation, and cancer, commonly termed anemia of chronic disease (ACD), features apparently normal or increased iron stores. However, 20% of these patients have iron-restricted erythropoiesis (functional ID), an imbalance between the iron requirements of the erythroid marrow and the actual iron supply. Functional ID leads to a reduction in red cell hemoglobiniza-tion, causing hypochromic microcytic anemia. The diagnosis of functional ID in real time is based on measuring the hemoglobin content of reticulocytes. An examination of the biochemical markers of iron metabolism demonstrates weaknesses in the diagnosis of functional ID. We developed a diagnostic plot for the assessment of iron status in ACD and the detection of advancing ID in patients with ID, ACD, and the combined state of functional ID and ACD. The plot indicates the correlation between a marker of the iron supply for erythropoiesis (ie, the ratio of the soluble transferrin receptor value to the logarithm of the ferritin value) and the reticulocyte hemoglobin content and functions as a marker of iron demand. The diagnostic plot shows good selectivity for assessing the iron status of disease-specific anemias such as classic ID, end-stage renal failure, cancer-related anemia, and the anemia of infection and inflammation. The therapeutic implications of the diagnostic plot are to differentiate patients who should be administered oral iron supplements, recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO), or a combination of r-HuEPO and iron. The response of erythropoiesis to r-HuEPO depends on the iron supply and the proliferation of erythropoiesis. The lack of an increase or a decrease in reticulocyte hemoglobin levels indicates a nonresponder to r-HuEPO or functional ID.

No abstract

Assessment and follow-up of renal dysfunction is important in the early detection and management of chronic kidney disease. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most accurate measurement of kidney disease and is reduced before the onset of clinical symptoms. Drawbacks to the measurement of GFR include the high cost and incompatibility with routine laboratory monitoring. Serum creatinine determination is a mainstay in the routine laboratory profile of renal function. The measurement of serum cystatin C has been proposed as a more sensitive marker for GFR. According to National Kidney Foundation-K/DOQ1 clinical guidelines for chronic kidney disease, serum markers should not be used alone to assess GFR. Based on prediction equations, clinical laboratories should report an estimate of GFR, in addition to reporting the serum value. In this article, information is presented on how best to estimate GFR using prediction equations for adults and for children. Using serum creatinine concentration with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation offers a suitable estimation of GFR in adults. The cystatin C prediction equation with the use of a prepubertal factor seems superior to creatinine-based prediction equations in children of <14 years.