Objective To examine: (1) differences in patient-reported outcomes, neuropsychological tests, and thalamic functional connectivity (FC) between patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and healthy controls; (2) the longitudinal association between changes in these measures. Design Prospective observational case-control study. Setting Academic medical center. Participants Thirteen patients with mTBI (mean age = 39.3 years, 4 female) and 11 healthy, age and sex-matched control subjects (mean age = 37.6, 4 female) were enrolled. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Resting-state FC (3T MRI scanner) was examined between the thalamus and the Default Mode Network (THAL-DMN), Dorsal Attention Network (THAL-DAN), and Frontoparietal Control Network (THAL-FPC). Patient-reported outcomes included pain (Brief Pain Inventory), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD Checklist), and post-concussive (Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire) symptoms. Neuropsychological tests included the D-KEFS Tower test, Trails B, and Hotel task. Assessments occurred at 6 weeks and 4 months after hospitalization for patients with mTBI and at a single visit for controls. Results Student’s t-tests found increased pain and depressive, PTSD, and post-concussive symptoms, decreased performance on Trails B, increased THAL-DMN FC, and decreased THAL-DAN and THAL-FPC FC in patients with mTBI compared to healthy controls. Spearman correlation coefficient indicated that increased THAL-DAN FC from baseline to 4 months was associated with decreased pain and post-concussive symptoms (corrected p < 0.05). Conclusions Findings suggest that alterations in thalamic FC occur after mTBI and improvements in pain and post-concussive symptoms are correlated with normalization of thalamic FC over time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.