Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of bronchiolitis in infants. Maternal immunization is an option to increase maternal antibody levels and protect infants from infection. Here we assess the efficacy of virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine candidates containing stabilized pre-fusion (pre-F) or post-fusion (post-F) conformations of the RSV F protein and the attachment RSV G protein in a maternal immunization model using cotton rats. VLP vaccines containing RSV F and G proteins strongly boost pre-existing RSV immunity in dams preventing their perinatal drop in immunity. Boosting is stronger for the pre-F VLP than for the post-F VLP or purified subunit F protein vaccines, giving an advantage on mothers’ protection. VLP immunization of dams provides significant protection to pups from RSV challenge and reduced pulmonary inflammation. Collectively, our results show that a VLP vaccine with RSV F and G proteins is safe and effective for maternal and adult vaccination.
Maternal vaccination may be the most effective and safest approach to the protection of infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, a severe acute lower respiratory tract disease in infants and young children worldwide. We previously compared five different virus-like particle (VLP)-associated, mutation-stabilized prefusion F (pre-F) proteins, including the prototype DS-Cav1 F VLPs. We showed that alternative versions of prefusion F proteins have different conformations and induce different populations of anti-F protein antibodies. Two of these alternative pre-F VLPs, the UC-2 F and UC-3 F VLPs, stimulated in mice higher titers of neutralizing antibodies than DS-Cav1 F VLPs (M. L. Cullen, R. M. Schmidt, M. G. Torres, A. A. Capoferri, et al., Vaccines 7:21–41, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines7010021). Here we describe a comparison of these two pre-F VLPs with DS-Cav1 F VLPs as maternal vaccines in cotton rats and report that UC-3 F VLPs significantly increased the neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers in pregnant dams compared to DS-Cav1 F VLPs. The neutralizing antibody titers in the sera of the offspring of the dams immunized with UC-3 F VLPs were significantly higher than those in the sera of the offspring of dams immunized with DS-Cav1 VLPs. This increase in serum NAb titers translated to a 6- to 40-fold lower virus titer in the lungs of the RSV-challenged offspring of dams immunized with UC-3 F VLPs than in the lungs of the RSV-challenged offspring of dams immunized with DS-Cav1 F VLPs. Importantly, the offspring of UC-3 F VLP-immunized dams showed significant protection from lung pathology and from induction of inflammatory lung cytokine mRNA expression after RSV challenge. Immunization with UC-3 F VLPs also induced durable levels of high-titer neutralizing antibodies in dams. IMPORTANCE Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant human pathogen severely impacting neonates and young children, but no vaccine exists to protect this vulnerable population. Furthermore, direct vaccination of neonates is likely ineffective due to the immaturity of their immune system, and neonate immunization is potentially unsafe. Maternal vaccination may be the best and safest approach to the protection of neonates through the passive transfer of maternal neutralizing antibodies in utero to the fetus after maternal immunization. Here we report that immunization of pregnant cotton rats, a surrogate model for human maternal immunization, with novel RSV virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine candidates containing stabilized prefusion RSV F proteins provides significant levels of protection of the offspring of immunized dams from RSV challenge. We also found that antibodies induced by VLPs containing different versions of the prefusion F protein varied by 40-fold in the extent of protection provided to the offspring of vaccinated dams upon RSV challenge.
Immunization with virus-like particles (VLPs
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.