Quantitative and qualitative changes in dermal collagen and elastin occur in response to chronic ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. These changes have been implicated in the genesis of the wrinkling seen in chronically irradiated, or photoaged skin. We examined the relationship between wrinkle formation and changes in dermal structural protein content and type. Skh-1 hairless mice were irradiated with suberythemal doses of UV-B three times a week for up to 20 wk. Visible wrinkling was present after 6-7 wk of irradiation. Dermal elastic fiber content was quantified by color image analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue. There was no significant difference in dermal elastic fiber content between irradiated and age-matched control mice after either 10 or 20 wk of irradiation. The effect of UV-B irradiation on total dermal collagen content, ratio of collagen type III-type I, and extent of glycosylation and crosslinking of collagen was no different in irradiated and age-matched control mice after 10 wk of irradiation. Increased epidermal thickness was evident in frozen sections after 6 wk of irradiation, and the thickness increased with continued irradiation. Dermal thickening was evident after 10 wk of irradiation. Sufficient UV-B irradiation will eventually cause changes in dermal elastin and collagen content; however, wrinkle formation precedes such changes. A causal relationship between wrinkle formation and dermal structural protein content changes in Skh-1 hairless mice could not be established in this study.

Acute exposure to UV radiation causes immunosuppression of contact hypersensitivity (CH) responses. Past studies conducted with unfiltered sunlamps emitting nonsolar spectrum UV power (wavelengths below 295 nm) or using excessive UV doses have suggested sunscreens may not prevent UV-induced immunosuppression in mice. This study was thus designed to evaluate critically the effects of different UV energy spectra on the immune protection capacity of sunscreen lotions. Minimum immune suppression doses (MISD), i.e. the lowest UV dose to cause approximately 50% suppression of the CH response to dinitrofluorobenzene in C3H mice, were established for three artificial UV sources. The MISD for each UV source was 0.25 kJ/m2 for unfiltered FS20 sunlamps (FS), 0.90 kJ/m2 for Kodacel-filtered FS20 sunlamps (KFS), which do not emit UV power at wavelengths < 290 nm, and 1.35 kJ/m2 for a 1000 W filtered xenon arc lamp solar simulator. Using MISD as baseline, sunscreens with labeled sun protection factors (SPF) of 4, 8, 15 and 30 were tested with each UV source to establish their relative immune protection factors. The immune protection factor of each sunscreen exceeded its labeled SPF in tests conducted with the solar simulator, which has a UV power spectrum (295-400 nm) similar to that of sunlight. Conversely, sunscreen immune protection factors were significantly less than the labeled SPF in tests conducted with FS and KFS. Comparison of the immunosuppression effectiveness spectra showed that relatively small amounts of nonsolar spectrum UV energy, i.e. UVC (200-290 nm) and/or shorter wavelength UVB (between 290 and 295 nm), produced by FS and KFS contributes significantly to the induction of immunosuppression. For example, 36.3% and 3.5% of the total immunosuppressive UV energy from FS and KFS, respectively, lies below 295 nm. Sunscreen absorption spectra showed that transmission of immunosuppressive UV energy below 295 nm for FS was at least eight-fold higher than that for KFS. Compared to the solar simulator UV spectrum the transmission of nonsolar immunosuppressive UV energy through sunscreens was > 15-fold higher for FS and > or = 1.5-fold higher for KFS. These data demonstrate that relevant evaluations of sunscreen immune protection can only be obtained when tests are conducted with UV sources that produce UV power spectra similar to that of sunlight and UV doses are employed that are based on established MISD.

Many photoimmunological studies have used UV radiation sources that emit nonsolar UV spectral energy and UV doses based on nonimmunological endpoints, e.g. erythema and skin edema. Interpretation of these data has led to misunderstanding when extrapolated to hypothetical effects in humans exposed to solar UV. The purpose of this study was to: (1) establish UV dose response relationships for murine skin edema and immunosuppression, and (2) determine how different UV spectra affect these relationships. Back skin and ear minimum edema doses (MEdD) for Kodacel‐filtered FS20 sunlamp UV (290–400nm) were greater than two‐fold higher than those for unfiltered FS20 sunlamp UV (250–400nm). Xenon arc solar simulator UV (295–400nm) MEdD were > 10‐fold higher than those for unfiltered sunlamp UV. Back skin and ear MEdD differed two‐ to five‐fold between C3H/ HeN, SWR/J and HRA/Skh‐1 mice. The minimum immunosuppression doses (MISD) in C3H mice showed similar UV source spectrum dependence. The solar simulator UV MISD was 5.4‐ and 1.5‐fold higher than for unfiltered and Kodacel‐filtered sunlamp UV MISD, respectively. Furthermore, MISD were from 3‐ to 50‐fold higher than the MEdD for the three UV sources. The UV bioeffectiveness spectra indicated that UVC energy (250–290nm) contributed 12% and 18%, respectively, of the total skin edema and immunosuppression UV energy. These data demonstrate the variability in UV sensitivity among mouse strains, the significant differences between murine MEdD and MISD and how these differences are influenced by nonsolar regions (below 295 nm) of the UV spectrum.

We compared three different staining methods to determine if the dermal elastic fiber content of the HRS/Skh-1 hairless mouse could be accurately measured by color image analysis. Comparisons were made among Kligman's modification of Luna's mast cell stain for elastin, Unna's orcein stain with or without potassium permanganate preoxidation, and Gomori's aldehyde fuchsin stain with potassium permanganate preoxidation. The color image analysis system could be used to identify and quantify murine dermal elastin fibers in sections stained by all three methods. Gomori's aldehyde fuchsin stain with preoxidation demonstrated twice the content of dermal elastic fibers demonstrated by either Kligman's modification of Luna's mast cell stain or Unna's orcein stain with or without preoxidation. Gomori's aldehyde fuchsin method with preoxidation should be considered the stain of choice for evaluating murine dermal elastic fiber content.