BackgroundRecently, muscle synergy analysis has become a standard methodology for extracting coordination patterns from electromyographic (EMG) signals, and for the evaluation of motor control strategies in many contexts. Most previous studies have characterized upper-limb muscle synergies across a limited set of reaching movements. With the aim of future uses in motor control, rehabilitation and other fields, this study provides a comprehensive characterization of muscle synergies in a large set of upper-limb tasks and also considers inter-individual and environmental variability.MethodsSixteen healthy subjects performed upper-limb hand exploration movements for a comprehensive mapping of the upper-limb workspace, which was divided into several sectors (Frontal, Right, Left, Horizontal, and Up). EMGs from representative upper-limb muscles and kinematics were recorded to extract muscle synergies and explore the composition, repeatability and similarity of spatial synergies across subjects and movement directions, in a context of high variability of motion.ResultsEven in a context of high variability, a reduced set of muscle synergies may reconstruct the original EMG envelopes. Composition, repeatability and similarity of synergies were found to be shared across subjects and sectors, even if at a lower extent than previously reported.ConclusionExtending the results of previous studies, which were performed on a smaller set of conditions, a limited number of muscle synergies underlie the execution of a large variety of upper-limb tasks. However, the considered spatial domain and the variability seem to influence the number and composition of muscle synergies. Such detailed characterization of the modular organization of the muscle patterns for upper-limb control in a large variety of tasks may provide a useful reference for studies on motor control, rehabilitation, industrial applications, and sports.

Multidomain instrumental evaluation of post-stroke chronic patients, coupled with standard clinical assessments, has rarely been exploited in the literature. Such an approach may be valuable to provide comprehensive insight regarding patients’ status, as well as orienting the rehabilitation therapies. Therefore, we propose a multidomain analysis including clinically compliant methods as electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), kinematics, and clinical scales. The framework of upper-limb robot-assisted rehabilitation is selected as a challenging and promising scenario to test the multi-parameter evaluation, with the aim to assess whether and in which domains modifications may take place. Instrumental recordings and clinical scales were administered before and after a month of intensive robotic therapy of the impaired upper limb, on five post-stroke chronic hemiparetic patients. After therapy, all patients showed clinical improvement and presented pre/post modifications in one or several of the other domains as well. All patients performed the motor task in a smoother way; two of them appeared to change their muscle synergies activation strategies, and most subjects showed variations in their brain activity, both in the ipsi- and contralateral hemispheres. Changes highlighted by the new multiparametric instrumental approach suggest a recovery trend in agreement with clinical scales. In addition, by jointly demonstrating lateralization of brain activations, changes in muscle recruitment and the execution of smoother trajectories, the new approach may help distinguish between true functional recovery and the adoption of suboptimal compensatory strategies. In the light of these premises, the multi-domain approach may allow a finer patient characterization, providing a deeper insight into the mechanisms underlying the relearning procedure and the level (neuro/muscular) at which it occurred, at a relatively low expenditure. The role of this quantitative description in defining a personalized treatment strategy is of great interest and should be addressed in future studies.

The letter presents a force-tracking impedance controller granting a free-overshoots contact force (mandatory performance for many critical interaction tasks such as polishing) for partially unknown interacting environments (such as leather or hard-fragile materials). As in many applications, the robot has to gently approach the target environment (whose position is usually not well-known), then execute the interaction task. Therefore, the algorithm has been designed to deal with both the free space approaching motion (phase a.) and the succeeding contact task (phase b.) without switching from different control logics. Control gains have to be properly calculated for each phase in order to achieve the target force tracking performance (i.e., free-overshoots contact force). In detail, phase a. control gains are optimized based on the impact collision model to minimize the force error during the following contact task, while phase b. control gains are analytically calculated based on the solution of the LQR optimal control problem. The analytical solution grants the continuous adaptation of the control gains during the contact phase on the estimated value of the environment stiffness (obtained through an on-line extended Kalman filter). A probing task has been carried out to validate the performance of the control with partially unknown contact environment properties. Results show the avoidance of force overshoots and instabilities

The standard EN ISO10218 is fostering the implementation of hybrid production systems, i.e., production systems characterized by a close relationship among human operators and robots in cooperative tasks. Human‐robot hybrid systems could have a big economic benefit in small and medium sized production, even if this new paradigm introduces mandatory, challenging safety aspects. Among various requirements for collaborative workspaces, safety‐assurance involves two different application layers; the algorithms enabling safe space‐sharing between humans and robots and the enabling technologies allowing acquisition data from sensor fusion and environmental data analysing. This paper addresses both the problems: a collision avoidance strategy allowing on‐line re‐planning of robot motion and a safe network of unsafe devices as a suggested infrastructure for functional safety achievement

Industry 4.0 is taking human-robot collaboration at the center of the production environment. Collaborative robots enhance productivity and flexibility while reducing human's fatigue and the risk of injuries, exploiting advanced control methodologies. However, there is a lack of real-time model-based controllers accounting for the complex human-robot interaction dynamics. With this aim, this paper proposes a Model-Based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) variable impedance controller to assist human operators in collaborative tasks. More in details, an ensemble of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) is used to learn a human-robot interaction dynamic model, capturing uncertainties. Such a learned model is kept updated during collaborative tasks execution. In addition, the learned model is used by a Model Predictive Controller (MPC) with Cross-Entropy Method (CEM). The aim of the MPC+CEM is to online optimize the stiffness and damping impedance control parameters minimizing the human effort (i.e, minimizing the human-robot interaction forces). The proposed approach has been validated through an experimental procedure. A lifting task has been considered as the reference validation application (weight of the manipulated part: 10 kg unknown to the robot controller). A KUKA LBR iiwa 14 R820 has been used as a test platform. Qualitative performance (i.e, questionnaire on perceived collaboration) have been evaluated. Achieved results have been compared with previous developed offline model-free optimized controllers and with the robot manual guidance controller. The proposed MBRL variable impedance controller shows improved humanrobot collaboration. The proposed controller is capable to actively assist the human in the target task, compensating for the unknown part weight. The human-robot interaction dynamic model has been trained with a few initial experiments (30 initial experiments). In addition, the possibility to keep the learning of the human-robot interaction dynamics active allows accounting for the adaptation of human motor system.