Coagulopathy represents one of the most important determinants of morbidity and mortality in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Whether standard thromboprophylaxis is sufficient or higher doses are needed, especially in severe patients, is unknown. To evaluate the safety of intermediate dose regimens of low-weight molecular heparin (LWMH) in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, particularly in older patients. We retrospectively evaluated 105 hospitalized patients (61 M, 44 F; mean age 73.7 years) treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin: 80 mg/day in normal weight and mild-to-moderate impair or normal renal function; 40 mg/day in severe chronic renal failure or low bodyweight (< 45 kg); 100 mg/day if bodyweight was higher than 100 kg. All the patients had radiologically confirmed pneumonia and 63.8% had severe COVID-19. None of the patients had fatal haemorrhage; two (1.9%) patients had a major bleeding event (one spontaneous hematoma and one gastrointestinal bleeding). Only 6.7% of patients needed transfusions of red blood cells. One thrombotic event (pulmonary embolism) was observed. When compared to younger patients, patients older than 85 years had a higher mortality (40% vs 13.3%), but not an increased risk of bleeding or need for blood transfusion. The use of an intermediate dose of LWMH appears to be feasible and data suggest safety in COVID-19 patients, although further studies are needed.

Objective Clinical trials offer new and potentially more effective therapeutic options for cancer patients and a potential cost-saving opportunity, especially considering that trial drugs are provided free-of-charge. The aim of this study was to analyse drug-related cost savings in clinical trials in a cancer institute over a 3 year period. The cost savings relate to the pharmaceutical expenditure of our centre, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients taking part in interventional clinical cancer trials approved by a local independent Ethics Committee between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. The standard of care (SOC) was identified as the standard treatment that would have been offered to a patient if he/she had not been enrolled in the study. The sum of SOC costs of all patients represents the potential cost avoidance during the study period. Results were stratified by year, trial promoter, trial phase and tumour type. The same approach was used to perform a secondary analysis of compassionate use programmes. Result In the 3 year analysis, 1,257 patients were treated with experimental therapies in 244 clinical trials, of which 157 were profit and 87 academic. Results showed an overall cost savings of €13,266,518, more than 50% of which (€7,035,009) was related to phase III studies. Profit clinical trials generated €9,069,764 (68.4%) of the drug cost savings compared with €4,196,754 (31.6%) of academic studies. The stratification for tumour type was €3,552,592 (26.8%) genitourinary cancer, €3,268,074 (24.6%) melanoma, €2,574,127 (19.4%) haematological malignancies, €2,330,791 (17.6%) lung cancer, €728,149 (5.5%) gastrointestinal cancer, €557,608 (4.2%) rare tumours and €255,178 (1.9%) breast cancer. The secondary analysis on compassionate use included 122 patients involved in 28 different access programmes and revealed cost savings of €1,649,550. Conclusion The results of our analysis point to the benefits of participating in and planning clinical trials for the public healthcare sector.

Conclusions: The hypertensive patients with genotype TT marked the highest efficiency of amlodipine on the background of the least amount arising ADR.

48 Background: 68Ga prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) is a highly sensitive diagnostic tool to detect prostate metastatic sites even at low levels of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). We evaluated the impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients treated with enzalutamide as first-line therapy for mCRPC. Methods: In an observational prospective study, 67 consecutive mCRPC patients were treated with enzalutamide 160 mg once daily in first-line for mCRPC. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was performed at baseline, after 3 months, during follow-up and at PSA/clinical progression. Patients were evaluated on a monthly basis for serological PSA response and safety. We measured at baseline the sum of metabolic total volume (SMTV), mean standardized uptake volume (SSUVmean), maximum standardized uptake volume (SSUVmax) and total lesion activity (STLA), which is the product of SMTV and SSUVmean, for a maximum of 20 lesions. These parameters together with baseline PSA level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), Gleason Score (GS) and age were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models as potential predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: At the moment of the present analysis, 58 mCRPC patients were considered fully evaluable. The median age was 75 years (range, 47-91), ECOG PS was 0 in 47 cases (81%), 1-2 in 11 (19%), GS was <8 in 22 (38%), 8-10 in 36 (62%), the median baseline PSA was 2.66 µg/L (range 0.09-197). We observed a median SMTV of 5.73 cm3, median SSUVmax of 44.85, median SSUVmean of 25.80 and median STLA of 59.66. At the median follow-up of 52 months, median PFS was 28.9 months (95% CI 16.3-43.6), median OS was not reached (95% CI 36.8-not reached). In univariate analysis, SSUVmax and STLA were significant for PFS (p=0.015 and p=0.001, respectively) and OS (p=0.026 and p=0.019, respectively), while SSUVmean was significant only for OS (p=0.028). On multivariate analysis, STLA only remained significant for PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.026). Conclusions: The assessment of mCRPC by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before starting enzalutamide was associated with longer median PFS and OS compared to prior studies using standard imaging only. STLA, expression of both volume and intensity of 68Ga-PSMA uptake, appeared the strongest parameter able to predict PFS and OS.