No abstract

Summary Updating memories is critical for adaptive behaviors, but the rules and mechanisms governing that process are still not well defined. During a limited time window, the reactivation of consolidated aversive memories triggers memory lability and induces a plasticity-dependent reconsolidation process in the lateral amygdala (LA) [1–5]. However, whether new information is necessary for initiating reconsolidation is not known. Here we show that changing the temporal relationship between the conditioned (CS) and unconditioned (US) stimulus during reactivation is sufficient to trigger synaptic plasticity and reconsolidation of an aversive memory in the LA. These findings demonstrate that time is a core part of the CS-US association, and that new information must be presented during reactivation in order to trigger LA-dependent reconsolidation processes. In sum, this study provides new basic knowledge about the precise rules governing memory reconsolidation of aversive memories that might be used to treat traumatic memories.

A long-standing hypothesis termed "Hebbian plasticity" suggests that memories are formed through strengthening of synaptic connections between neurons with correlated activity. In contrast, other theories propose that coactivation of Hebbian and neuromodulatory processes produce the synaptic strengthening that underlies memory formation. Using optogenetics we directly tested whether Hebbian plasticity alone is both necessary and sufficient to produce physiological changes mediating actual memory formation in behaving animals. Our previous work with this method suggested that Hebbian mechanisms are sufficient to produce aversive associative learning under artificial conditions involving strong, iterative training. Here we systematically tested whether Hebbian mechanisms are necessary and sufficient to produce associative learning under more moderate training conditions that are similar to those that occur in daily life. We measured neural plasticity in the lateral amygdala, a brain region important for associative memory storage about danger. Our findings provide evidence that Hebbian mechanisms are necessary to produce neural plasticity in the lateral amygdala and behavioral memory formation. However, under these conditions Hebbian mechanisms alone were not sufficient to produce these physiological and behavioral effects unless neuromodulatory systems were coactivated. These results provide insight into how aversive experiences trigger memories and suggest that combined Hebbian and neuromodulatory processes interact to engage associative aversive learning.Hebbian plasticity | amygdala | neuromodulation | instructive signals | associative learning H ebbian plasticity refers to the strengthening of a presynaptic input onto a postsynaptic neuron when both pre-and postsynaptic neurons are coactive (1). This was originally proposed as a mechanism for memory formation. Findings from in vitro and in vivo physiological studies suggest that Hebbian processes control synaptic strengthening (2-10). However, other results and theories suggest that Hebbian mechanisms alone are not normally sufficient for producing synaptic plasticity and that synaptic strengthening mediating memory formation involves interactions between Hebbian and neuromodulatory mechanisms (3,4,7,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Although molecules that may mediate Hebbian processes in memory formation have been identified (3,11,16,17,(20)(21)(22), it has been difficult to directly test whether Hebbian plasticity alone or in combination with neuromodulation is necessary and sufficient to produce neural plasticity and memories in behaving animals (especially in mammals). This is because of technical limitations in controlling correlated activity between pre-and postsynaptic neurons involved in memory storage in a temporally/spatially precise manner while measuring behavioral memory formation and neural plasticity.To overcome these problems, we used optogenetic techniques to directly manipulate Hebbian mechanisms in pyramidal neurons in the lateral nucl...

Atypical antipsychotics show preferential 5-HT 2A versus dopamine (DA) D 2 receptor affinity. At clinical doses, they fully occupy cortical 5-HT 2 receptors, which suggests a strong relationship with their therapeutic action. Half of the pyramidal neurones in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) express 5-HT 2A receptors. Also, neurones excited through 5-HT 2A receptors project to the ventral tegmental area (VTA). We therefore hypothesized that prefrontal 5-HT 2A receptors can modulate DA transmission through excitatory mPFC-VTA inputs. In this study we used single unit recordings to examine the responses of DA neurones to local (in the mPFC) and systemic administration of the 5-HT 2A/2C agonist 1-[2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl-2-aminopropane] (DOI). Likewise, using microdialysis, we examined DA release in the mPFC and VTA (single/dual probe) in response to prefrontal and systemic drug administration. The local (in the mPFC) and systemic administration of DOI increased the firing rate and burst firing of DA neurones and DA release in the VTA and mPFC. The increase in VTA DA release was mimicked by the electrical stimulation of the mPFC. The effects of DOI were reversed by M100907 and ritanserin. These results indicate that the activity of VTA DA neurones is under the excitatory control of 5-HT 2A receptors in the mPFC. These observations may help in the understanding of the therapeutic action of atypical antipsychotics.

Studies of reconsolidation, in which retrieved memories are altered and restored, offer a novel approach for exploring the associative structure of fear memory. Here we show in rats that exposure to the unconditioned stimulus initiates an unconditioned stimulus–specific reconsolidation of learned fear that depends on the amygdala. Thus, specific features of the unconditioned stimulus appear to be encoded in the amygdala as part of fear memories stored there.

Fear extinction, which involves learning to suppress the expression of previously learned fear, requires N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and is mediated by the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Like other types of learning, extinction involves acquisition and consolidation phases. We recently demonstrated that NR2B-containing NMDARs (NR2Bs) in the lateral amygdala (LA) are required for extinction acquisition, but whether they are involved in consolidation is not known. Further, although it has been shown that NMDARs in the vmPFC are required for extinction consolidation, whether NR2Bs in vmPFC are involved in consolidation is not known. In this report, we investigated the possible role of LA and vmPFC NR2Bs in the consolidation of fear extinction using the NR2B-selective antagonist ifenprodil. We show that systemic treatment with ifenprodil immediately after extinction training disrupts extinction consolidation. Ifenprodil infusion into vmPFC, but not the LA, immediately after extinction training also disrupts extinction consolidation. In contrast, we also show pre-extinction training infusions into vmPFC has no effect. These results, together with our previous findings showing that LA NR2Bs are required during the acquisition phase in extinction, indicate a double dissociation for the phase-dependent role of NR2Bs in the LA (acquisition, not consolidation) and vmPFC (consolidation, not acquisition).

No abstract

These results indicate that aripiprazole modulates the in vivo 5-HT and DA release in mPFC through the activation of 5-HT(1A) receptors. Moreover, aripiprazole behaves as a partial agonist at DA D2 autoreceptors in vivo, an action which clearly distinguishes it from haloperidol.