BACKGROUND: The integration of a biopsychosocial screening (BPS) program has been proposed by international agencies to better identify and effectively manage unmet needs among patients with cancer. We sought to evaluate the effect of a BPS program on hospital admissions and length of stay (LOS) among a diverse sample of patients with cancer and receiving treatment in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed from March 2020 to December 2021. Eligible patients were diagnosed with cancer and were receiving treatment at a private practice in Brazil. Clinical characteristics, participation in the BPS program, hospital admissions, reason, and LOS in hospital were evaluated. We compared the number of hospital admissions and LOS between groups (participation v no participation). T test and Chi-square test were used to test for differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,014 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline clinical characteristics were well balanced between groups (n = 459 patients who participated and n = 555 patients who did not). The median age of patients was 63 years. Breast and hematological cancers were the most common types of cancer; 60% were diagnosed at an advanced disease stage. A smaller proportion of patients who participated in the BPS program were hospitalized compared with patients who did not participate (8% v 32%, P = .001). Patients who participated in the program also spent less days in the hospital compared with patients who did not participate in the program (M = 4.2 days v 9.8 days, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Engagement in a BPS program was associated with reduced hospital admissions and LOS. This study provides novel insight into the potential broader implications of BPS programs for clinical care systems. Future studies are needed to explore the mechanisms behind such associations.

Background This study sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a remote geriatric assessment (GA) and implementation (GAIN) program in Brazil. The authors also explored the effect of this program on health‐related quality of life (HR‐QOL) outcomes 3 months after initiating treatment. Methods This is a longitudinal study enrolling older adults (65+ years), diagnosed with any type of solid tumor, scheduled to initiate chemotherapy in a networked Brazilian cancer center. The GA was performed through telehealth. We assessed the feasibility of the remote GA, acceptability to patients, and changes in patient‐centered outcomes (HR‐QOL, mood, function) from baseline to month 3. Linear mixed model analysis was done, adjusting for age, gender, race, income, and disease stage. Results Fifty‐six patients completed all intended assessments. Notably, the threshold of feasibility was 70% and there was 92% complete adherence. Average age was 76 years old (SD = 7.2). Most patients were female (57%), married (59%), and had a college degree (46%). The most common diagnoses were gastrointestinal (39%) and gynecological cancers (18%); most were diagnosed at an advance disease stage (77%). A total of 32 patients were referred to a remote appointment and 86% followed this recommendation(s). Significant improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy ‐ General FACT‐G (mean difference, 6.04; p < .001), Geriatric Depression Scale (mean difference, −0.86; p = .008), and instrumental activities of daily living ratio (mean difference, 0.17; p < .001) were found. Conclusion Remote GAIN is feasible and acceptable to older adults with cancer receiving treatment in Brazil. The authors also found significant improvement in HR‐QOL outcomes over time. Notably, this GAIN program could guide early detection of chemotherapy toxicity and improving patient‐reported outcomes in low‐resource environments.

324 Background: mRCC is associated with high rates of distress, high levels of symptom burden, and broad impairments in quality of life. In the setting of localized breast cancer, a smartphone application directed at enhancing mindfulness has been developed from a Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery program demonstrated to mitigate these factors (Utkarsh et al. Digital Health 2021); we sought to determine if the benefit of a similar application could be translated to patients with mRCC. Methods: Patients were recruited across two sites in the US and Brazil, and were eligible for the study if they had been diagnosed with mRCC, were receiving immunotherapy, reported clinically-relevant anxiety, had a smart phone with internet access, were currently not engaging in meditation, and had not participated in a mindfulness program in the past 5 years. Patients were asked to participate in mindfulness app-based activities for 20-30 minutes each day guided by the Mindfulness-Based Cancer Survivorship Journey program within AM Mindfulness smartphone app (AmDTx™), for a minimum of 4 days per week, over a period of 4 weeks. The application leads the patient through exercises in guided meditation and suggestions for cancer/cancer symptom coping. Patients were assessed at baseline and 2-weeks after using the 4-week smartphone-app based intervention using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence-7 and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General scales. Reported data is evaluated using paired t-tests with a p-value of < 0.05 considered significant. Results: A total of 23 patients have been recruited to date. Median age was 59 years old; most were male (52%), white/Caucasian (52%), married (69%) and college educated (82%), and primarily receiving treatment with nivolumab (34%) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (30%). The majority of patients (78%) expressed satisfaction and engaged with the intervention; however, a minority (13%) noted that the intervention reminded them of their cancer diagnosis, which was seen as a negative aspect. Preliminary analyses of data after two weeks of the intervention have demonstrated a statistically significant decreases in fear of cancer progression (mean differences: baseline = 22; week 2 = 18, p = 0.012) and increases in quality of life (mean differences: baseline = 77; week 2 = 85, p = 0.001) over time. Physical and emotional well-being also showed significant improvement over time. Complete data with 12 weeks of follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This is the first study to implement an evidence-based, smartphone-accessible psychosocial support tool among mRCC patients. After only two weeks, we noted significant improvements in the fear of cancer progression and quality of life. This preliminary data suggests that this type of low-cost, mobile-app based intervention was acceptable to patients and may be effective at addressing psychosocial distress

72 Background: The integration of biopsychosocial screening programs (BSP) has been promoted as a way by which to identify unmet needs and to provide tailored treatments to patients. Studies have reported mixed outcomes regarding the impact of such services on hospital admissions during cancer treatment. This study sought to evaluate the effect of a BSP on hospital admissions and length of stay among a large, heterogenous sample of patients diagnosed with cancer (March 2020 to December 2021). Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients diagnosed with cancer receiving treatment at a single institution located in the capital of Brazil. We assessed patients’ characteristics via chart review (e.g., age, sex, histology, hospital admission, length of hospitalization). In addition, as per the BSP protocol, patients were assessed via standardized self-report questionnaires (Distress Thermometer, FACT-G, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment), and appropriate interventions are provided. This program was offered at no cost to all patients and engagement was voluntary. We compared the number of hospital admissions and length of stay between groups (patients who participated in the BSP vs. those who did not). Mixed linear models adjusted for selected characteristics (age, type of cancer and disease stage) were assessed. Results: A total of 1014 patients were included in this analysis. From the total sample, 84% participated in the BSP and 20% were hospitalized for an average of 9 days (ranging from 1-80 days). Mostly patients were female (63%), median age was 63 years old. Breast cancer (26%), hematological (18%), and gastrointestinal cancer (14%) were the most common types of cancer, and the majority had advanced disease (stage III-IV; 67%). Compared to those who engaged in the BSP, patient’s characteristics were well balanced, however, the proportion of patients hospitalized during their cancer treatment was higher among patients who did not participate in the BSP (27% vs 8%: P = 0.001), as was the length of hospitalization spent more days in the hospital than patients who has participated in the BSP (M = 9.5 days vs M = 4.2 days; P = 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest the benefit of a BSP in reducing hospitalizations and length of stay among patients with cancer. An integrated model of care may assist in targeting patient’s unmet needs and may positively impact clinical and hospital-based outcomes. This is the first study to evaluate the effects of a BSP among a Brazilian population using real world data.

No abstract

660 Background: Previous randomized studies have shown the benefit of interventions to increase mindfulness in multiple cancer types, including prostate cancer (Chambers et al JCO 2017), but limited data exists in mRCC. We sought to determine the effect of an app-based mindfulness intervention on anxiety, fear of cancer progression (FCR), fatigue and HR-QOL in this population. Methods: Eligible patients had mRCC, were receiving IO, had measurable symptoms of anxiety or FCR, had a smartphone with internet access and had not participated in a mindfulness program in the past 5 years. Patients were recruited in Brazil across 7 private centers and one academic center in the US. We evaluated the Mindfulness-Based Cancer Survivorship Journey, a program within the Am Mindfulness smartphone app (AmDTx). Patients used AmDTx for 20-30 minutes each day for a minimum of 4 days per week over a period of 4 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline (T1) and at weeks 2 (T2), 4 (T3) and 12 (T4) using the PROMIS-Anxiety, FCR-7, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G). RM-ANOVA was used to test the effect of time on symptoms and on HR-QOL. Results: A total of 41 patients were recruited; median age was 59 (range, 36-79) and patients were predominantly male (70%), white (61%), married (75%) and well educated (65% had at least a college degree). Most patients were receiving nivolumab/ipilimumab (44%), nivolumab (22%) or axitinib/pembrolizumab (9%). Symptoms of anxiety significantly decreased from 21.6 + 4.8 to 12.5 + 5.1 (P=0.001). Similar findings were found for FCR (MT1=21.4 to MT4=13.5, P=0.001) and fatigue (MT1=32.0 to MT4=19.4, P=0.001). Notably, HR-QOL increased from 81.1 + 13.4 to 92.7 + 14.9 (P=0.001). No significant differences were identified based on disease characteristics or type of therapy. Conclusions: The current study suggests that smartphone-based mindfulness intervention could improve HR-QOL and decreased FCR, anxiety and fatigue. This low-cost, easily accessible intervention may provide an important alternative to in-person psychosocial support for patients with mRCC and should be assessed in randomized trials in this disease. Funding: Kure It Cancer Research: 2020 Barry Hoeven Memorial Kidney Cancer Research Grant (PI: C D Bergerot).

12052 Background: Older cancer patients in developing countries face considerable challenges in obtaining access to specialized medical attention, often due to a lack of human resources and healthcare infrastructure. This study sought to explore the benefit of a remote, validated geriatric assessment (GA) program for older patients starting chemotherapy in Brazil. Methods: Older adults (65+ years) beginning a new chemotherapy treatment regimen in Brazil were recruited. Through telehealth, patients were assessed with GA before starting chemotherapy treatment for any type of solid cancer and at a follow-up visit (3 months after enrollment). GA results were discussed by a multidisciplinary team (e.g., geriatrician, psychologist, nutritionist) and recommendations were determined. Outcome measures included chemo toxicity scores (CARG, scale 0-19), physical symptoms (FACT-G, scale 0-108) and activities of daily living (IADL, scale 0-5 for men and 0-8 for women, or scale 0-1 for IADL ratio). Descriptive statistics were generated, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the change in these measures over time. Results: A total of 51 older patients from 5 different Brazilian states (Amazonas, Distrito Federal, Espirito Santo, Pernambuco and Rio Grande do Sul) have been enrolled to date. The mean distance from a patients’ home to their place of cancer treatment was 21 miles (range: 3-101 miles). Participants had a mean age of 76.5 years (SD = 7.6) and were predominantly female (57%), white (57%), married (61%), and had a high school degree or more (65%). Patients were mostly diagnosed with gastrointestinal (39%) or gynecological (20%) cancers; 55% of patients were diagnosed with a stage IV disease. The majority of patients (80%) were referred to appropriate remote services based on the GA; including geriatricians (41%), nutritionists (39%) and/or psychologist (16%). At the time of abstract submission, data from 34 complete cases were available for longitudinal analysis, in which we observed a decrease in chemo toxicity scores (M1= 6.65, M2= 5.88, p = 0.035) and an improvement in FACTG (M1= 92.94, M2= 98.53, p < 0.001). The improvement in IADL ratio was not significant (M1= 0.79, M2= 0.85, p = 0.069). Conclusions: This novel, ongoing study is, to our knowledge, the first to implement a remote GA program in Brazil. Our preliminary findings suggest that a remote GA program, with appropriate referrals to specialists, may increase the reach of supportive services and improve cancer care in developing countries.