No abstract

The bicyclic hexaamine "cage" ligand Me(8)tricosaneN(6) (1,5,5,9,13,13,20,20-octamethyl-3,7,11,15,18,22-hexaazabicyclo[7.7.7]tricosane) is capable of encapsulating octahedral metal ions, yet its expanded cavity allows the complexed metal to adopt a variety of geometries comprising either hexadentate or pentadentate coordination of the ligand. When complexed to Cu(II) the lability of the metal results in a dynamic equilibrium in solution between hexadentate- and pentadentate-coordinated complexes of Me(8)tricosaneN(6). Both [Cu(Me(8)tricosaneN(6))](ClO(4))(2) (6-coordinate) and [Cu(Me(8)tricosaneN(6))](S(2)O(6)) (5-coordinate) have been characterized structurally. In weak acid (pH 1) a singly protonated complex [Cu(HMe(8)tricosaneN(6))](3+) has been isolated that finds the ligand binding as a pentadentate with the uncoordinated amine being protonated. vis-NIR and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy show that the predominant solution structure of [Cu(Me(8)tricosaneN(6))](2+) at neutral pH comprises a five-coordinate, square pyramidal complex. Cyclic voltammetry of the square pyramidal [Cu(Me(8)tricosaneN(6))](2+) complex reveals a reversible Cu(II/I) couple. All of these structural, spectroscopic, and electrochemical features contrast with the smaller cavity and well studied "sarcophagine" (sar, 3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaazabicyclo[6.6.6]eicosane) Cu(II) complexes which are invariably hexadentate coordinated in neutral solution and cannot stabilize a Cu(I) form.

The ability of aurothiomalate and auranofin to alter the production of several cellular mediators of inflammation by RAW264.7 macrophages, was compared with each other and that of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs). Addition of auranofin was found to have a pronounced ability to lower the production of reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RNS and ROS respectively), as well as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF), by macrophages that were subsequently treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to stimulate production of the mediators. In contrast, prior treatment of the cells with either aurothiomalate or Au NPs had either little or no significant effect on production of RNS and ROS. Treatment of the macrophages with Au NPs had a small effect on production of TNF by cells that were subsequently stimulated with LPS; however, the effect was much smaller than that elicited by auranofin. Similarly, aurothiomalate had a small but significant effect on production of IL-10. Varying the size of the Au NPs or the identity of the protective sheath surrounding the nanoparticles did not have a significant effect on the production of RNS or ROS by LPS-stimulated macrophages. The results of some of these investigations are discussed in the light of other studies reported in the literature. In addition, results obtained by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy are presented that provide evidence for the accumulation of gold within macrophages exposed to Au NPs.