Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We investigated the cardiovascular safety of nintedanib using pooled data from the TOMORROW and INPULSIS trials.Cardiovascular events were assessed post hoc in patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and/or one or more cardiovascular risk factors at baseline (“higher cardiovascular risk”) and patients with no history of atherosclerotic CVD and no cardiovascular risk factors at baseline (“lower cardiovascular risk”).Incidence rates were calculated for 1231 patients (n=723 nintedanib and n=508 placebo), of whom 89.9% had higher cardiovascular risk. Incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were similar in the nintedanib and placebo groups in patients with higher cardiovascular risk (3.88 (95% CI 2.58–5.84) and 3.49 (95% CI 2.10–5.79) per 100 patient-years, respectively) and lower cardiovascular risk (4.78 (95% CI 1.54–14.82) and 5.37 (95% CI 1.73–16.65) per 100 patient-years, respectively). Incidence rates of myocardial infarction in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, were 3.03 (95% CI 1.91–4.81) and 1.16 (95% CI 0.48–2.79) per 100 patient-years in patients with higher cardiovascular risk and 1.59 (95% CI 0.22–11.29) and 1.78 (95% CI 0.25–12.64) per 100 patient-years in patients with lower cardiovascular risk. Incidence rates of other ischaemic heart disease in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, were 1.85 (95% CI 1.02–3.34) and 3.28 (95% CI 1.94–5.54) per 100 patient-years in patients with higher cardiovascular risk and 0 and 1.80 (95% CI 0.25–12.78) per 100 patient-years in patients with lower cardiovascular risk.These data help to establish the cardiovascular safety profile of nintedanib in IPF.
Introduction Transparent collaborations between patient organisations (POs) and clinical research sponsors (CRS) can identify and address the unmet needs of patients and caregivers. These insights can improve clinical trial participant experience and delivery of medical innovations necessary to advance health outcomes and standards of care. We share our experiences from such a collaboration undertaken surrounding the SENSCIS® clinical trial (NCT02597933), and discuss its impact during, and legacy beyond, the trial.Summary We describe the establishment of a community advisory board (CAB): a transparent, multiyear collaboration between the scleroderma patient community and a CRS. We present shared learnings from the collaboration, which is split into three main areas: (1) the implementation and conduct of the clinical trial; (2) analysis and dissemination of the results; and (3) aspects of the collaboration not related to the trial.1. The scleroderma CAB reviewed and provided advice on trial conduct and reporting. This led to the improvement and optimisation of trial procedures; meaningful, patient-focused adaptations were made to address challenges relevant to scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease patients.2. To ensure that results of the trial were accessible to lay audiences and patients, written lay summaries were developed by the trial sponsor with valuable input from the CAB to ensure that language and figures were understandable.3. The CAB and the CRS also collaborated to co-develop opening tools for medication blister packs and bottles. In addition, to raise disease awareness among physicians, patients and caregivers, educational materials to improve diagnosis and management of scleroderma were co-created and delivered by the CAB and CRS.Conclusions This collaboration between POs and a CRS, in a rare disease condition, led to meaningful improvements in patient safety, comfort and self-management and addressed information needs. This collaboration may serve as a template of best practice for future collaborations between POs, research sponsors and other healthcare stakeholders.
Introduction Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare condition that can be complicated by interstitial lung fibrosis (SSc-ILD)—a major cause of mortality. This study explored information and communication needs of patients with SSc-ILD and their carers to understand what they are and whether they are met. Methods Qualitative research was performed, including in-depth individual interviews and observed conversations between pairs of patients, physicians and nurses, and between patients and physicians discussing experiences of SSc-ILD. The study was performed in Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA. Participants included 42 SSc-treating physicians, 21 patients with diagnosed SSc-ILD, 16 specialist nurses and five carers. Results Prognosis and mortality were the main unspoken topics acknowledged by patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Patients and carers felt afraid to ask physicians about mortality, and most physicians reported avoiding the question because their duty was to give patients hope and avoid causing additional distress. Patients often felt unable to ask physicians about relationships, family and work because of time constraints or because they felt these were not topics physicians would be concerned about. Often, specialist nurses felt that they had insufficient knowledge to provide adequate support. Conclusion Key topics, including mortality and prognosis, are rarely openly discussed, leaving patients uncertain and anxious about the future. By communicating about difficult but important topics, physicians and nurses could help patients and carers manage and plan their lives. This study shows that a multi-professional team-based communication approach is likely to better address patient needs and priorities. Key Points • Key topics in SSc or SSc-ILD, such as mortality and prognosis, are rarely openly discussed in clinical consultations. • By communicating difficult but important topics, physicians and nurses could help patients manage their disease and plan their lives. • A multi-professional team-based communication approach is likely to better address patient needs and priorities and could be easily implemented without the need for significant additional resources.
Background:In the INBUILD trial in subjects with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks by 57% compared with placebo.Objectives:To assess the rate of decline in FVC in subjects with RA-ILD in the INBUILD trial.Methods:Subjects in the INBUILD trial had a chronic fibrosing ILD other than IPF, reticular abnormality with traction bronchiectasis (with or without honeycombing) of >10% extent on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥45% predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide ≥30%–<80% predicted, and met criteria for progression of ILD within the 24 months before screening, despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice. Patients taking stable doses of approved medications to treat RA or connective tissue disease could participate, except that the protocol excluded those taking azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, or oral glucocorticoids >20 mg/day. We analysed the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks and adverse events in subjects with RA-ILD.Results:Of 663 subjects who received trial medication, 89 had RA-ILD (42 nintedanib, 47 placebo), of whom 60.7% were male, 64.0% were current or former smokers, 86.5% had a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like pattern on HRCT; 93.3% had received confirmation of their RA diagnosis from a rheumatologist. At baseline, 21.3% of subjects were taking biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 53.9% were taking non-biologic DMARDs and 73.0% were taking glucocorticoids (≤20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent). At baseline, mean (SD) age was 66.9 (9.6) years, time since RA diagnosis was 9.9 (9.4) years, time since ILD diagnosis was 3.6 (3.2) years, FVC was 71.5 (16.2) % predicted and C-reactive protein was 13.7 (22.5) mg/L. The adjusted mean (SE) rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks was -82.6 (41.3) mL/year in the nintedanib group versus -199.3 (36.2) mL/year in the placebo group (difference 116.7 mL/year [95% CI 7.4, 226.1]; nominal p=0.037), consistent with findings in the overall trial population (Figure). As in the overall trial population, the most common adverse event in subjects with RA-ILD was diarrhoea (reported in 54.8% of the nintedanib group and 25.5% of the placebo group). Adverse events led to permanent discontinuation of trial drug in 19.0% of subjects in the nintedanib group and 12.8% of subjects in the placebo group.Conclusion:In the INBUILD trial, nintedanib slowed the rate of decline in FVC in patients with progressive fibrosing RA-ILD, with adverse events that were manageable for most patients. The efficacy and safety of nintedanib in subjects with RA-ILD were consistent with those observed in the overall trial population.Acknowledgements:The INBUILD trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim. Medical writing support was provided by Fleishman Hillard Fishburn, London, UK. The authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).Disclosure of Interests:Clive Kelly Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eric Matteson Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim and Gilead Sciences, Grant/research support from: Sun Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer, Martin Aringer Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, HEXAL, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, Heiko Mueller Employee of: Currently an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Lizette Moros Employee of: Currently an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Klaus Rohr Employee of: Currently an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Martin Kolb Consultant of: Algernon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris Pharmaceuticals and Roche, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris Pharmaceuticals and Prometic
Introduction and AimNintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, a drug class that may be associated with increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events. The efficacy and safety of 52 weeks’ treatment with nintedanib versus placebo in patients with IPF were assessed in the TOMORROW and INPULSIS trials. Patients with myocardial infarction in the previous 6 months, unstable angina in the previous month, or stroke in the previous year were excluded. We assessed the effect of CV risk at baseline on the CV safety of nintedanib 150 mg bid.MethodsIncidence rates of major adverse CV events (MACE) in subgroups of patients with a history of atherosclerotic CV disease and/or≥1 CV risk factor at baseline (higher CV risk), and patients with no history of atherosclerotic CV disease and no CV risk factors at baseline (lower CV risk), were analysed using pooled data from the TOMORROW and INPULSIS trials. CV risk factors were defined as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, current/former smoking, and diabetes. MACE were based on fatal adverse events included in the system organ classes “cardiac disorders” and “vascular disorders” in MedDRA; events in the subordinate standardised MedDRA query (SMQ) “myocardial infarction”; stroke based on selected preferred terms from the subordinate SMQs “haemorrhagic cerebrovascular conditions” and “ischaemic cerebrovascular conditions”; and MedDRA preferred terms “sudden death”, “cardiac death” and “sudden cardiac death”.ResultsAt baseline, 1107 (89.9%) patients (656 nintedanib, 451 placebo) had higher CV risk and 124 (10.1%) patients (67 nintedanib, 57 placebo) had lower CV risk. In patients with higher CV risk, incidence rates (95% CI) of MACE were 3.88 (2.58, 5.84) and 3.49 (2.10, 5.79) per 100 patient–years in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively. In patients with lower CV risk, incidence rates (95% CI) of MACE were 4.78 (1.54, 14.82) and 5.37 (1.73, 16.65) per 100 patient–years in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively.ConclusionIn pooled data from the TOMORROW and INPULSIS trials, the incidence of MACE was similar between the nintedanib and placebo groups in patients with higher CV risk at baseline and in patients with lower CV risk at baseline.Please refer to page A262 for declarations of interest in relation to abstract M34.Abstract M34 Figure 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.