In recent years, the topic of ‘digital transformation’ has become a primary focus in the areas of business and research. Among digital technologies, the area attracting the most investment is artificial intelligence (AI). Research shows that AI can benefit corporate governance in a variety of ways. In this article, we identify two academic streams on the topic and evaluate the existing literature. The first stream analyses AI-driven improvements in governance mechanisms such as boards of directors (BoD). The second stream explores the digital-driven organisational changes and broad governance adaptations necessary for AI improvements. We evaluate the evidence for AI implementation in improving and evolving traditional aspects of corporate governance. The examined authors argue that digital technologies transform the nature of a firm, making it less based on traditional sources of authority. There is consensus that this environment calls for fundamental reconsideration of corporate governance and for the revision of regulatory models, moving towards decentralisation. Specific areas examined in these contexts include jobs automation, agency conflict, auditing processes, the selection of BoD members, compliance functions, data analytics, and capital allocation.The examined research indicates that AI improves corporate governance and lowers agency cost by automating decision making using real-time big data analysis. However, while researchers propose multiple novel approaches to governance, practical implementation of those approaches or an empirical analysis of the results of such experiments is yet to occur. Despite the consensus among researchers on the positive impact of AI for governance and implementations as making AI a part of BoD, open questions and skepticism persist. This is indicative of the immaturity of AI as a technology in terms of development and implementation, and as such there is ample scope for future research. We propose multiple areas within this article where opportunities exist for further insight within this burgeoning field.
This article discusses the results of a continuous study of Russian domestic air carriers conducted in 2006-2016 and analyzes the main barriers to entry into the passenger air travel market and their impact on competition in this field. There are significant structural barriers that prevent companies from entering this market. This situation challenges the existing concept and the idea of the domestic air transportation market as a quasi-competitive one. To describe the structure of the Russian passenger air transport market, we introduce the notion of "discrete competition, " reflecting shifted density of market concentration towards small regional airlines. The latter are usually united by ownership mechanisms or affiliation with an airport. They possess considerable market power, but at the same time have an insignificant market share in the overall Russian passenger air market. Administrative barriers also play a crucial role in restraining competition. Furthermore, current institutional conditions are favourable for vertical 'airport -airline' integration which results in a fundamental transformation, as described by Williamson, and can be detrimental to competition. As our research findings have shown, there is a trade-off between existing vertically integrated structures in the air passenger market and public welfare.
The search for new sources of regional development is important due to the slowdown in economic growth and the need to shift the emphasis of industrial policy from the macro level to the level of regions and individual companies. In this regard, we consider the participation of companies in reputation ratings as a new source for increasing the investment attractiveness of regions. Additionally, we examine the relationship between corporate and regional ratings: corporate ratings demonstrate a company’s compliance with the sustainable development goals, which, in turn, improves the socio-economic performance of regions. We revealed the positive influence of high corporate ratings on the socio-economic development of regions, opening a new area for interdisciplinary research combining corporate finance and regional economics. On the example of 130 biggest Russian public non-financial companies, we obtained several significant results that allow determining the impact of corporate ratings on the socio-economic situation of regions and corporate financial performance. The ratings include Sustainable development Index of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RUIE), Environmental responsibility rating of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Russia, and Corporate social responsibility rating of the Association of Managers of Russia (AMR). The calculations showed that the participation of companies in the ratings of WWF Russia and RUIE positively affects the indicators sustainable development of regions where these companies are located. Simultaneously, the influence of companies’ participation in the rating of WWF Russia is higher than the influence of participation in the RUIE rating. In addition, reputation ratings have a positive impact on the return on assets and market capitalisation of Russian companies. Thus, we proved that participation in corporate ratings leads to an increase in performance. However, the effects of participation in various ratings differ. For example, to increase its conditions and performance, a company should be a leader of the rating of RUIE and just participate in the rating of WWF Russia. The rating of AMR influences the market capitalisation the most. The obtained findings indicate the need for expanding the participation of Russian companies in corporate ratings and enable research in the field of sustainable development of companies.
The article discusses the main provisions of the book “The response of Russian business to the COVID-19 pandemic (Six industry cases)” and, in this regard, the difficulties and prospects for the development of Russian companies and industries, as well as the national economy in general, under complex sanctions. The short post-crisis development of the six industries presented in the monograph and possible forks for companies and structural policy in the acute phase of the current crisis are analyzed. In addition, it is proposed to consider industries that have not fallen into the focus of the authors’ attention, but are significant for indicating medium-term trends in the development of the Russian economy, such as the production of hydrocarbons, food products, ferrous and non-ferrous metals. On the basis of the results obtained in the book, current development trends at the global and national levels are highlighted. The article notes the need for an integrated approach to the elaboration of state policy and concludes on the possibility and directions for using the lessons of the crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic, both by the state and business, to transform the principles of management in the new reality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.